Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Troopergate "created some desperation among McCain campaign officials and their lackeys."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 02:15 PM
Original message
Troopergate "created some desperation among McCain campaign officials and their lackeys."
October 4, 2008

TROOPERGATE DESPERATION.... It's a shame major media outlets never really sunk their teeth into Sarah Palin's "Troopergate" scandal. I thought a candidate for national office in the midst of an ongoing abuse-of-power scandal, in which she's changed her story and pretty clearly lied, would be a fairly big deal. For the most part, it's considered a tangential footnote, which most voters have probably never heard of.

Indeed, when Palin broke her word about cooperating with the bipartisan investigation, her aides and husband refused to honor subpoenas, and Republicans filed a lawsuit to quash the investigation altogether, I foolishly assumed alarm bells would go off for campaign reporters. Alas, that didn't happen, either.

This week, an Alaskan judge refused to block the rest of the bipartisan investigation, clearing the way for a release of a report on the probe on Friday.

As Josh Marshall noted, this has created some desperation among McCain campaign officials and their lackeys.

Republican state legislators, at the behest of the McCain campaign, have now filed an emergency appeal with the Alaska Supreme Court trying to shutdown the 'Troopergate' investigation. The plaintiffs (echoing the Bush v. Gore decision) claim "the plaintiffs and Alaskans will suffer irreparable harm" if the Branchflower report is released, as scheduled, next Friday, October 10th.

Bear in mind, the people in charge of the investigation moved the release date up so as not to have it released on the eve of the election. That was the original schedule long before Palin was chosen as veep nominee. And the GOP lawyers the McCain campaign sent to Alaska have succeeded in having almost all the parties connected to Palin refuse to cooperate with the investigation. So it's not completely clear just what Branchflower is going to be able to come up with, either inculpating or exculpating.

But this is an opportunity to refocus our attention on something that has been lost in the nonstop coverage of Palin's campaign trail lies and botched interviews: her record in Alaska strongly suggests she lacks the character to be trusted with high office. Though the troopergate scandal is tied narrowly to Palin's firing of Alaska's top cop, Walt Monegan, the heart of the story is about a private vendetta that Palin tried to settle using her new powers as the chief executive of the state of Alaska. Thwarted in doing so, all evidence suggests she fired the public official who refused to execute her plan.

Nor is it the only example. Both as mayor and governor, Palin has shown the tell-tale signs of a politician who hires cronies and fires or blackballs critics. This part of Palin's record gets deep in the weeds. So it's not as flashy as the boffo interviews or as irresistible as the straight-up lies she's been caught in. But we need no closer example than the Bush administration to know that people like this are dangerous and corrosive to our public institutions.

For all of Palin's ridiculous qualities, humiliating mistakes, and breathtaking lies, it's worth pausing once in a while so as to not miss the forest for the trees.


Where is the media?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vanderBeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. They can't cite Bush-v-Gore...
The SC expressly said that decision did NOT set president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's something very suspicious about the lawyers
who have been sent here to stop this investigation. Please read Gryphen's post here at The Immoral Majority in its entirety. I think there's even more here than meets the eye. http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2008/10/republican-stormtroopers-dark-side-of.html

Quote:

So to sum up it appears that the oil companies are more then likely donating tax exempt funds to the Liberty Legal Institute to launder their fee which is being paid to Kevin Clarkson to try to stop an investigation which may damage Sarah Palin's career, and put a stop to ALL of their nefarious plans. "Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Palin's entire political career was established
to front for GOP corruption.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. She did a pretty good job
of convincing us she was "different" before this whole VP thing came up. She looked good compared to the previous four years of Frank Murkowski. I wonder how long this has all been in the planning stages.

I'm really troubled by these lawyer connections, and now I'm even more suspicious of Sarah's deal with Trans-Canada than I was before.

Maybe we Alaskans owe John McCain a debt of gratitude for exposing Sarah to national scrutiny and allowing these secrets to come out -- but these people need to be stopped at all costs. I think they're capable of just about anything. I won't rest easy until Obama is safely in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC