So were Palin's SAT scores ever debunked or is she really that stupid?

[Hokie]

[Patient]

1. You never needed them in the first place.

That woman is as smart as a bag of wet rats.

[malik flavors]

2. That was debunked. The grades were photoshopped.

[Hokie]

4. Got a link there bunky?

[malik flavors]

11. here:

http://dawneden.blogspot.com/2008/10/nutroots-use-my-sat-scoresheet-to-forge.html

Via politico's Ben Smith.

[Hokie]

12. OK this is definitive. My apology for being snarky.

[KathieG]

5. Yep...I thought they were much too high.

[Hokie]

3. That is why debunking them is so hard

She speaks and acts like someone with below average intelligence. The real ones could even be worse than the ones that were published. As a matter of fact I'll bet that is why we are not seeing any comment from McPalin on these. The ones on the Internet may be flattering when compared with her own. :dunce:

[Frank Booth]

6. Apparently the SAT started reporting scores in multiples of 10 in 1980,

and the picture showed a score of 841 in 1981. So, assuming the change in reporting really was in 1980, then it was definitely fake.

[BlooInBloo]

7. Both can be true.

[kennetha]

8. I don't think that Sarah Palin has much brain power at all.

Dim as 20 watt bulb. Can't string a complete thought together.

BUT I do have to say that she seems like a kind of a natural politician. (which shows something about the political class, I guess.) Give her some time and she'll be as popular with the Repugnants as Ronald Reagan -- another dim bulb, if you ask me. In fact, now that I'm thinking about it, it's amazing how brain challenged their candidates have been in recent and not so recent years. Reagan and Bush II both had bricks for brains. But Palin is a different class entirely, I guess. I mean she makes the shrub look like an intellectual giant.

[Ikonoklast]

9. Res ipso loquitor.

Numbers be damned.

[FightingIrish]

10. She did flunk the VPAT

That's the Vice Presidential Aptitude Test. It requires knowledge of what publications you read, Supreme Court decisions that directly affect you and the contents of legislative investigations that find you ethically lacking.