Has anyone else had to dispute this to people?
this is the last email...
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_liberation_theology This is the encyclopedia’s definition of what Rev. Jeremiah Wright says is Black theology. And of course we have all heard how he feels about white people and America. This is what Obama’s moral belief is no matter what he says (he spends every week in this church with these beliefs). When you are crying because you realize you are making too much and aren’t the right color to receive all these wonderful benefits that Obama claims to want to give you (which by the way he can’t do because you can’t give the kind of health care he suggests without raising your taxes also) you will understand why I get so worked up over this racist. And that is only one of the areas where he talks out of both sides of his mouth (with all racism asside). There are plenty of things I could send that seem to be fact but I don’t believe everything the news or republican website say…you shouldn’t either.
The one thing I do know is that the church you attend speaks volumes about your moral belief and values. You cannot dispute that without saying you don’t believe in what we are learning in church every week at our church.
Also read this:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2004/march/37.77.html Here is a statement from Dwight N. Hopkins (who Obama believes in).
Just a little food for thought and you have it at your hands (the Bible). Read in Mathew about marriage and relationships (will have to look up the exact paragraphs. It states that a Man should never be with a Man. It states it more definitely in the Bible but without pulling it out right now (which I don’t have time for) I am not sure the true sentence but it speaks very clearly about it.
Heart and Head consists of eight essays that Dwight N. Hopkins presented "at different times and in different contexts," all related to black liberation theology. Hopkins, associate professor of theology at the University of Chicago Divinity School, has published over a dozen titles in the field.
His chapter headings are intriguing: "Black Theology of Liberation and the Impact of Womanist Theology," "The Preferential Option for the Poor and the Oppressed," "Spirituality and Transformation in Black Theology," "A New Black Heterosexual Male," "A Black American Perspective on Interfaith Dialogue in the Ecumenical Association of Third World Theologians," "The Religion of Globalization," "James H. Cone and Thoughts for a New Generation," and "A New Common Wealth."
Following the first generation of black theologians, especially Cone, Hopkins says that for the movement to evolve, black theology must always be linked with the liberation of the poor and oppressed. It should have a continuing link with the prophetic black churches and church-related institutions.
Black theology, he says, must also deliberately unite with womanist theology, cultivating "a prolonged, organized conversation and joining practice between womanists and (male) black theologians." (Womanist refers to the black feminist movement, emphasizing strong, assertive traits.) Black women must be empowered for making decisions in "business ownership, politics, education, religion, the family, and more."
Furthermore, he says, black women must be accepted as pastors, bringing new styles of church leadership.
Hopkins calls for more global interfaith dialogue that would connect multiple versions of liberation theology. Finally, he calls for developing what it means "to be a healthy heterosexual African American man."
This is just a small part of this article but it isn’t truly about freedom of racism it is about freedom of blacks over everyone else. You notice even when talking about womanist theology, they are only talking about BLACK woman.
I can give you many facts on issues and the people he connects himself to in his personal life but his own religiouse beliefs should be enough for you not to vote for him even if you don’t vote for McCain
She won't stop about this... Any good responses? I'm not sure how to respond. I know she is a lost cause but at the same time I don't want no response to mean that she is right