Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm boiling angry! The Washington Post ombudsman needs to hear from our side.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:14 PM
Original message
I'm boiling angry! The Washington Post ombudsman needs to hear from our side.
Do you remember the Washington Post's coverage of the Monica episode, printing unsubstantiated leaks and gossip on the frontpage day after day after day? Do you remember Ceci Connally's demonization of Al Gore as she covered his 2000 campaign? Did the Post adequately call out the Swift Boat lies in 2004? Has any of this "bias" been addressed in the pages of the Post?

If our guy got a fair shake in the Post in 2008, it's about time!!!

* WP: Remedying the Bias Perception
By Deborah Howell, Ombudsman
Sunday, November 16, 2008; Page B06

Thousands of conservatives and even some moderates have complained during my more than three-year term that The Post is too liberal; many have stopped subscribing, including more than 900 in the past four weeks. It pains me to see lost subscribers and revenue, especially when newspapers are shrinking. Conservative complaints can be wrong: The mainstream media were not to blame for John McCain's loss; Barack Obama's more effective campaign and the financial crisis were.

But some of the conservatives' complaints about a liberal tilt are valid. Journalism naturally draws liberals; we like to change the world. I'll bet that most Post journalists voted for Obama. I did. There are centrists at The Post as well. But the conservatives I know here feel so outnumbered that they don't even want to be quoted by name in a memo....

Tom Rosenstiel, a former political reporter who directs the Project for Excellence in Journalism, said, "The perception of liberal bias is a problem by itself for the news media. It's not okay to dismiss it. Conservatives who think the press is deliberately trying to help Democrats are wrong. But conservatives are right that journalism has too many liberals and not enough conservatives. It's inconceivable that that is irrelevant."

Here are recent news decisions that brought conservative complaints; readers can judge for themselves:

· The Post put on Page 1 two long stories about "Troopergate" -- the allegation that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin fired her state's public safety commissioner because he wouldn't dismiss her ex-brother-in-law from his state trooper's job. One of the Page 1 stories was eight paragraphs long, under a one-column headline on an inside page.

· The front page of the Oct. 10 Metro section featured a story and photo about Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) as a "giant-slayer" who had "won plaudits" for his work as head of the House Democrats' national campaign committee. The story only briefly mentioned his Republican opponent, Steven J. Hudson. A campaign story on both ran inside the paper.

· A Post Magazine spread on Oct. 5 about Michelle Obama, with a cover picture of the Obamas, was timed to the release of a book by Magazine writer Liza Mundy. There was no cover for John and Cindy McCain.

· Robin Givhan's Oct. 23 column exploring the disconnect between Palin's fancy duds and her hockey mom image ran on the Style cover just above an upbeat story about Jill Biden, the wife of Vice President-elect Joseph Biden. Conservatives thought the placement's message was "Bad Palin, Good Biden."

Combine these with the drumbeat of polling stories saying Obama and the Democrats were likely to win, a few Tom Toles cartoons and TV critic Tom Shales's debate reviews -- both are liberals who are paid to offer opinions -- and conservatives decided that The Post was cheerleading -- especially since they felt the paper hadn't sufficiently scrutinized Obama.

(NOTE: THIS IS ALL THEY'VE GOT? WHAT WHINING!)

The opinion pages have strong conservative voices; the editorial board includes centrists and conservatives; and there were editorials critical of Obama. Yet opinion was still weighted toward Obama. It's not hard to see why conservatives feel disrespected. Are there ways to tackle this? More conservatives in newsrooms and rigorous editing would be two....

Rosenstiel said, "There should be more intellectual diversity among journalists. More conservatives in newsrooms will bring about better journalism. We need to be more vigilant and conscious in looking for bias. Our aims are pure, but our execution sometimes is not. Staff members should feel in their bones that unfairness will never be tolerated."...

One more factor will kick in soon. After Obama is inaugurated, he will be the authority the news media challenge. It happens in every administration.

(NOTE: NOT IN THE LAST ONE, MS. HOWELL -- NOT UNTIL IT WAS TOO LATE!)

Deborah Howell can be reached at: ombudsman@washpost.com.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/14/AR2008111403057.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can't bee-leeve this shit. Their coverage of the 2000 was TERRIBLE. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Alice. In. Wonderland.
The jabberwocky is flowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep, Dems in charge = "Clinton Rules"
I.e., lap dogs morph into pit bulls, ready to chomp on any and all slander and gossip to make the "authority" (read, Dems) look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rec'd~ Let's get BUSY.
This has been written because of the "thousands of letters" from whackos..I don't care what the ombudsman calls them.

You're right, DeepModemMom..Deborah Howell needs to hear the facts with examples and then she can write another column and explain that.

She sounds full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree! I've communicated my thoughts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick for
Action:kick::party::bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC