|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:30 PM Original message |
See where these Hillary SoS rumors are heading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. Ah, the HRC as VP movement. What memories. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cosmic Charlie (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. the game's the same just on another level |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. Well, it didn't work when they tried to force his hand on his VP choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
60. And, I hope it doesn't happen this time. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Personally, I think it's a done deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. "Otherwise, there would have been denials " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed_up_mother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I don't think he wants to anger the HIllary supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. He's the one allowing the rumors to get out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. You seem to be implying exactly that in your OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I'm implying? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. "Obama is now in a box." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Silly, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. It will be confirmed in due time, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Actually, they are still unsourced rumors, nothing more. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. You said impossible to confirm, but we know that isn't true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Have it been confirmed that Obama offered Hillary a job at State? NO? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:41 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Yes it has, simply ask Google News. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:44 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. No it hasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. We'll see then, won't we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. "We'll see then, won't we?" You said it was confirmed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:54 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. The meeting about SoS was confirmed by a source, most certainly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Firespirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. And a few Georgia hicks have Bigfoot in their freezer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:48 PM Original message |
They were right about Biden, and given how things have been going lately, I'd say that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Firespirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
45. Not going to say "he offered her the post" anymore, are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
46. Maybe it was all the Secret Service and media in front of his house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:55 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. No they didn't. Hillary was off somewhere else and hardly anyone was watching her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Firespirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. I would say, in fact, it's all but proven that he did NOT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. If he did not a denial would be in order, otherwise ProSenses' fear of him being in a box... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Who said he was in a box? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. The only person in denial is the person who can't accept a widely reported story as truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Other than he met with Hillary, what are the facts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. The facts are a person affiliated with the transition team said that it was with regards to SoS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:55 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. No one on the transition team confirmed or denied any of the rumors. Period. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Leaks never come from the top. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Firespirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. You've obviously never worked in politics before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. No, that's not it, the source affiliated with the transition team stated explicitly it was SoS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Firespirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:55 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. My God, this is ignorant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 01:17 AM Response to Reply #27 |
84. Obama camp does not leak. Only when some clinton staffers came on board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. I meant this part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:40 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:40 PM Original message |
Obama has already confirmed the meeting with Hillary was about the SoS position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
34. No he hasn't. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. For the life of me I don't understand why Hillary would even WANT that job, but whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vattel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. I've seen this sort of remark a lot around here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 01:05 AM Response to Reply #15 |
81. Because being a Senator is a pretty amazing job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. She's imminently qualified, and if she wants it she should have it, IMHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 01:04 AM Response to Reply #6 |
79. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
62. I agree. Hillary had a look on her face that said "I got what I wanted." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
4. Where do they come up with this crap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. The OP is not known to post reliable sources. Blogs and obscure writers tend to be their choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. You're so full of shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. One a blog, one an op ed. Thanks for proving my point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. The NYT is a blog? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. The NYT link is an op ed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. "The OP is not known to post reliable sources. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. You post decisive innuendo that isn't supported by the facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:27 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. You said the NYT piece was an op-ed. You were wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
8. The leaks are coming from his side, not some sort of conspiratorial "Clinton ploy." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. BS. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
59. Sorry, but Obama hasn't allowed leaks at all and I doubt he would start now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:51 AM Response to Reply #59 |
74. Holy crap some of you are absolutely nuts. WTF? I'm still confused as to how Hillary can force Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
32. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
36. IMO, it's all about what to do with Bill, her replacement in the Senate or maybe UN Amb. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
49. This seems like nothing more than Clinton media manipulation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 09:01 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. Yes, the Clintons really control the media alright! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. They know how to manipulate it and they do have connections. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
63. So after everything President Obama can be put in a situation? You must be kidding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
64. ANOTHER thread on this topic? You're more interested in this story than most Hillary supporters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:27 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. "you'd think his team would be hitting back at the "bitch" by now. " Fucking read the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:31 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. You are tiresome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:32 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. You're whiny. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:38 AM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Ah, you noticed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Don't bother with ProSense, just another anti-Clinton post n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:39 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Be sure that you follow up the whining with actually reading the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:40 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Yawn, don't you get tired of your Clinton trash fests n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:55 AM Response to Reply #72 |
76. Don't you trust Obama's judgment? Why not let him decide who he wants to pick, whether or not that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:58 AM Response to Reply #76 |
77. This has nothing to do with Obama's judgment. This is about the BS leaks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 01:02 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Again, if the leaks are from a "Clintonite" how does that help Hillary's cause? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 01:05 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. How do the leaks help Obama? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 01:11 AM Response to Reply #80 |
83. How are they hurting him? And if the Obama camp is upset why aren't they hitting back? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 01:06 AM Response to Reply #64 |
82. Prosense is a firewalker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 01:25 AM Response to Reply #82 |
85. Hillaryous! But, I've made no secret of the fact that I joined that other site during the primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hulka38 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
73. It's not as if she was the only he asked to come to Chicago to meet with him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 12:53 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. Exactly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-16-08 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
86. Oh, geez................... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC