Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

See where these Hillary SoS rumors are heading

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:30 PM
Original message
See where these Hillary SoS rumors are heading
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 06:39 PM by ProSense

Obama camp hints at cabinet post for Clinton

By Edward Luce in Washington

Published: November 15 2008 02:00 | Last updated: November 15 2008 02:00

Hillary Clinton watchers interpreted the former first lady's vigorous campaigning on behalf of Barack Obama as a smart insurance policy: were Mr Obama to have lost the election she would have been well positioned to run again in 2012. But sometimes insurance policies pay out in unexpected ways.

Democratic officials confirmed yesterday that Mrs Clinton flew to Chicago on Thursday at Mr Obama's request to discuss an unspecified role in the Obama administration - probably as secretary of state, but Pentagon chief was also cited as a possibility.

Given the lingering resentment among some of Mrs Clinton's staff at what was seen as her mistreatment by Mr Obama when he was drawing up his short list of candidates for vice-president, many were still sceptical yesterday.

But they pointed out that, in contrast to rumours surrounding John Kerry, the former presidential candidate whose name has also been floated as a possible secretary of state, the Clinton leaks were coming from figures close to the president-elect.

"I would be shocked if Obama did not offer Hillary something after putting this possibility out there in the public realm," said a senior staff member for Mrs Clinton. "It would be like a deliberate kick in the teeth. I can't see what he would gain from doing that."

more


No confirmation, but somehow Obama is now in a box?

On edit: The media has gone from reporting that Hillary was offered the job as SoS to now reporting that she discussed an "unspecified role - probably as secretary of state, but Pentagon chief was also cited as a possibility."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, the HRC as VP movement. What memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmic Charlie Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. the game's the same just on another level
VP, SOS, SOD, just so long as they get to force Obama's hand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, it didn't work when they tried to force his hand on his VP choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
60. And, I hope it doesn't happen this time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Personally, I think it's a done deal
Otherwise, there would have been denials before now for this very reason. It would have been easy for someone from his campaign to say that Senator Clinton is being vetted along with other candidates, but so far...nada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. "Otherwise, there would have been denials "
Yeah, Obama is going to allow media-driven rumors to force his hand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't think he wants to anger the HIllary supporters
If it wasn't true, he'd have denied it by now.

But...that's just my take.

We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. He's the one allowing the rumors to get out.
Just so we're all on the same page. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. You seem to be implying exactly that in your OP.
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 08:19 PM by oktoberain
That the media is trying to "box him in." If his hand can't be forced (as I believe, too) then why the worry about what the media thinks of his choice? Why all of this concern? Whatever decision he makes is going to be one that he made of his own free will--as you said, nobody is going to "force his hand."

Maybe DU should just accept that Obama doesn't make decisions based on what WE want, but rather on what HE thinks is best for the nation. I know we are all worried about the future, but he's a hell of a lot smarter (and more informed) than we are. I never fully "trust" any politician, but I also don't think it's wise to start ripping his decisions to shreds before we've even seen what the effects will be.

I'm rather looking forward to seeing what the next four years will bring. :)

Edit: And hopefully four MORE years after that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I'm implying?
"I would be shocked if Obama did not offer Hillary something after putting this possibility out there in the public realm," said a senior staff member for Mrs Clinton. "It would be like a deliberate kick in the teeth. I can't see what he would gain from doing that."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. "Obama is now in a box."
What utter bullshit. The rumors didn't take traction until after the meeting, in which several people affiliated with the transition team confirmed that indeed it was a top cabinet position that was being discussed.

Obama didn't meet with Hillary to say hi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Silly,
did you see the comment in the article and the question mark after my statement?

The rumor was that she was offered the job. It was clearly false, or at the very least impossible to confirm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. It will be confirmed in due time, actually.
And given that the leaks came from the Obama camp, it would look like your innuendo is falsely misplaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Actually, they are still unsourced rumors, nothing more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. You said impossible to confirm, but we know that isn't true.
As we'll have a SoS in quite a short time from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Have it been confirmed that Obama offered Hillary a job at State? NO?
Alright them. Right now, this moment as the rumors fly, they are impossible to confirm.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Yes it has, simply ask Google News.
Please don't ignore the sources, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. No it hasn't
Obama met with Hillary Clinton on Thursday at his headquarters in Chicago, and some Democrats were enthusiastic amid speculation the pair discussed the job of secretary of state. She declined Friday to say anything about the matter, and Obama is understood to be considering other candidates as his top diplomat, including Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., Democratic Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico and retiring Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb.

link


Speculation by unnamed sources is not the same as confirmation by Obama, not even close.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. We'll see then, won't we?
You are quite delusional though if you cannot accept that he met with her over the SoS position. It doesn't even mean he chose her, that they only met, geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. "We'll see then, won't we?" You said it was confirmed.
I think you are the delusional one. Your argument is all over the place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. The meeting about SoS was confirmed by a source, most certainly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. And a few Georgia hicks have Bigfoot in their freezer.
The media have never, ever gotten a story wrong.

The fact that Obama met with Richardson proves that he did not make an offer to Clinton for a post. He asked her if she would be interested in being vetted for something. This came out yesterday evening. You're behind the times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:48 PM
Original message
They were right about Biden, and given how things have been going lately, I'd say that...
...Richardson and Clinton are absolutely 100% top contenders and after the fact they will both say they were in fact considered for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
45. Not going to say "he offered her the post" anymore, are you?
Sorry, but I really doubt that Hillary will give you a pat on the back, or anything else, though you've certainly worked hard for it this year. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
46. Maybe it was all the Secret Service and media in front of his house.
They also tried to claim he was going to select Hillary as his VP.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. No they didn't. Hillary was off somewhere else and hardly anyone was watching her.
The rumor had been put out nights before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. I would say, in fact, it's all but proven that he did NOT.
The leaks stating that "Obama advisers" thought Richardson was a "flake" and Kerry was a "lightweight" are, erm, rather proven false, as is the rumor that Obama offered Clinton a spot, by the simple fact that Obama visited Richardson on Friday as well to discuss the State post. That visit itself indicates where much of the Hillary-pimping is coming from: Hillary partisans who happen to work for Obama right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. If he did not a denial would be in order, otherwise ProSenses' fear of him being in a box...
...would be quite founded, no?

The reality is that he did in fact meet with her over the position. This is pretty indisputable at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Who said he was in a box?
Do you understand what you read?

Only the RW and idiots consider non-denial as confirmation.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. The only person in denial is the person who can't accept a widely reported story as truth.
But would rather believe the hyperbole that somehow the Clintons are behind some sort of conspiracy trying to box Obama into picking her for such a position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Other than he met with Hillary, what are the facts?
Did he offer her the job as was reported?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. The facts are a person affiliated with the transition team said that it was with regards to SoS.
Why be in denial over that report? Why post so much crap about how the media is trying to make Obama do something he might not want to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. No one on the transition team confirmed or denied any of the rumors. Period. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Leaks never come from the top.
And I never said as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. You've obviously never worked in politics before
You don't make absolute statements.

He met with her over something and asked her if she would be interested in being vetted for something. Already, in the space of 24 hours, the story has gone from "Obama thinks Richardson is a flake and offered Hillary Secretary of State!" to "Obama met with Hillary to gauge her interest in a position that may be State but may be something else, oh and he met with Richardson too." That is a fact. You believe what you choose to believe because you are a Hillary partisan, but the story is not what her handlers claimed it was yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. No, that's not it, the source affiliated with the transition team stated explicitly it was SoS.
It may have included other positions (particularly if Hillary did not want SoS) but this is undeniable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. My God, this is ignorant.
Obama himself specifically instructed his people not to give up confidential information to the media. When the team consisted strictly of Obama's own people, this did not happen. Obama's top people aren't talking to the media. The "source affiliated with the transition team" is a Clintonite who has an agenda to push. This really is not that hard. They were documented to have exaggerated and lied about (1) the substance of the meeting, (2) Obama's opinion of the other contenders (who happen to be Clinton opponents now), and (3) whether the meeting was for ONE post or a variety of posts. This is proven. Why would you believe anything that proven liars say, unless you WANT to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Here:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j5E3DeQixcDeV65wYtsEMWibVQ1w

You have *no evidence* that the source "is a Clintonite."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #27
84. Obama camp does not leak. Only when some clinton staffers came on board.
coincidence? maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I meant this part.
No confirmation, but somehow Obama is now in a box?

Obviously, if the media can't "force his hand" about denying the leak, then it stands to reason that they also are not "forcing his hand" about the pick in the first place.

Frankly, he doesn't strike me as the kind of man who can be bullied or manipulated by the media, or anyone else.
I don't see what the worry is. He'll pick who he picks, and we'll see how it goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. dupe
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 08:41 PM by joshcryer
dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:40 PM
Original message
Obama has already confirmed the meeting with Hillary was about the SoS position.
So I guess the media made him meet with her over it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. No he hasn't. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. For the life of me I don't understand why Hillary would even WANT that job, but whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I've seen this sort of remark a lot around here,
and I wish someone would explain why the job would be undesirable to her. The MSM has been saying the opposite, and supporting their conclusion by pointing out that (1) she's only a junior senator, (2) the SOS is an extremely influential and high-profile position, and (3) adding SOS to her resume would help her if she runs for president in 2016. What is the argument on the other side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
81. Because being a Senator is a pretty amazing job.
And you're pretty much your own boss. SoS reports to the president. Also, traditionally policially it has been sort of a dead end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. She's imminently qualified, and if she wants it she should have it, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
79. I agree
I don't know why she would want it unless she wants to be out of government in 4-8 years. If that's her goal, then why not. I think she would be a good fit. I never dreamed that she would do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
62. I agree. Hillary had a look on her face that said "I got what I wanted."
I think she's a good choice.

There are other choices that would have been good, too, but I like her for SofS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Where do they come up with this crap?
"...Pentagon chief was also cited as a possibility."

Hillary as SecDef? Whoever told the writer that has a wicked sense of humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. The OP is not known to post reliable sources. Blogs and obscure writers tend to be their choice.
If you were to ask ABC or the Washington Post you'd know that the leaks are from people affiliated with the Obama camp.

But then, even this "source" makes that connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You're so full of shit.
They're bullshit rumors, and they're being pushed by every Clinton shill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. One a blog, one an op ed. Thanks for proving my point!
Everyone please follow ProSenses' links, then do a google news search on the *source* of these leaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The NYT is a blog?
What about George Stephanopoulos? Obscure.

You're in denial.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. The NYT link is an op ed.
You're delusional. Absolutely delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. "The OP is not known to post reliable sources. "
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 08:19 PM by ProSense
You're full of shit. The NYT piece is not an op-ed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. You post decisive innuendo that isn't supported by the facts.
Until you can disprove the connection between the Obama camp and the rumors (the one cited by WaPo and ABC News) your vile postings are completely absurd and irrelevant.

Your own link right here and now is in fact taken wholesale from a blog posting, hardly any facts, just speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. You said the NYT piece was an op-ed. You were wrong.
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 08:27 PM by ProSense
your vile postings are completely absurd and irrelevant


Idiotic, especially since you seen to be obssessed enough to make BS claims to support your ludicrous assertions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. The leaks are coming from his side, not some sort of conspiratorial "Clinton ploy."
The point being that the meeting with Obama was a serious discussion on a significant cabinet position.

I know this bothers many here, but it's looking more and more likely. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. BS. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
59. Sorry, but Obama hasn't allowed leaks at all and I doubt he would start now.
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 09:15 PM by wisteria
The sources are more than likely not close Obama people but people far down on the rung, that have connections to someone, who has connects to someone else. And, the sources are all Clinton people. This is Clinton manipulation pure and simple to back Obama into a corner or perhaps to vindictively get back at those who did not support her for President. Frankly, if this is the type of woman she is we should all be grateful that she did not become president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #59
74. Holy crap some of you are absolutely nuts. WTF? I'm still confused as to how Hillary can force Obama
to make her SOS. In fact, trying to force his hand would ensure that he would never pick her for a cabinet position. And in case you didn't notice, there's isn't exactly a groundswell of support among us Hillary supporters for her to be in his administration, anyway. Most of us think she is better off in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our fourth quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. IMO, it's all about what to do with Bill, her replacement in the Senate or maybe UN Amb. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
49. This seems like nothing more than Clinton media manipulation.
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 08:53 PM by wisteria
Frankly, if she is directly responsible for this circus, I hope all she gets is a kick in the teeth. It escapes me why she is entitled to anything at all and this game of hers seems to be her way of trying to say she and Bill are still powerful and important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. Yes, the Clintons really control the media alright!
What a bunch of histarical bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. They know how to manipulate it and they do have connections. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
63. So after everything President Obama can be put in a situation? You must be kidding.
If he said no, big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
64. ANOTHER thread on this topic? You're more interested in this story than most Hillary supporters.
Also, if Obama's hand is being forced, as you suggest, you'd think his team would be hitting back at the "bitch" by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #64
65. "you'd think his team would be hitting back at the "bitch" by now. " Fucking read the article.
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 12:27 AM by ProSense
"I would be shocked if Obama did not offer Hillary something after putting this possibility out there in the public realm," said a senior staff member for Mrs Clinton. "It would be like a deliberate kick in the teeth. I can't see what he would gain from doing that."


That was the reference the question pertains to. Clue: The quote is not mine.


As for your comment overall:

:nopity:



Stop whining.


:rofl:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. You are tiresome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. You're whiny. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #67
69. Ah, you noticed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. Don't bother with ProSense, just another anti-Clinton post n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #68
70. Be sure that you follow up the whining with actually reading the article.
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 12:39 AM by ProSense
Or was the only purpose you stopped in was to register this whiny assed comment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. Yawn, don't you get tired of your Clinton trash fests n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #71
72. Here
But nominating Clinton would come with substantial risks for Obama, adding a potential degree of tension to an inner circle that has prided itself on cohesiveness. Nor would Clinton, who voted to authorize the war in Iraq, be an obvious choice to convey the message of change that has defined Obama.

In addition to her initial differences with Obama on Iraq, Clinton also faced sharp criticism during the primaries when she said she had endured sniper fire in Bosnia, despite television footage showing otherwise. Some Obama supporters also questioned her foreign policy experience, arguing that it has largely been based on her travels as a presidential spouse rather than being rooted in diplomacy.

Perhaps the most pressing question is whether Clinton would pass the rigorous Obama vetting process, which would include a thorough examination of her husband Bill Clinton's private business since leaving office. Obama aides had said during the primaries that Hillary Clinton was not seriously considered for vice president in part because of the work of the former president, who has made millions giving speeches to foreign entities and companies, including some in China and Saudi Arabia, since 2001 and would be required to fully disclose his private work and to name the donors to his presidential library and global charity. His decision to serve on the board of the Yucaipa Cos., a California private equity firm run by billionaire Ronald W. Burkle, his friend, raised eyebrows, as did questions about whether he played a role in helping a Canadian financier land a uranium contract in Kazakhstan.

<...>

The Rev. Al Sharpton, who supported Obama during the Democratic primaries, said it would be a "dream team on the global scene" and would "just on its face change foreign policy."

But Sharpton acknowledged that some African Americans would not support the choice. "The downside is a lot of people are still upset with the Clintons about their behavior during the primary. A lot of people are saying, 'Don't reward them.' " But he added that "clearly, Hillary Clinton has credentials. Barack Obama says he loves the book 'Team of Rivals,' so maybe he's trying to put together a Cabinet like Abe Lincoln."

link


Enjoy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #72
76. Don't you trust Obama's judgment? Why not let him decide who he wants to pick, whether or not that
includes Hillary? Again, I am confused as to how a "Clintonite" leaking this "fake" story will back Obama into a corner and "force his hand." Obama's the leader of the party. He's in charge and he makes the decisions. It seems to me that if this is some grand Clinton ploy (freeptastic!) all it would do is ensure that Obama DOESN'T pick her for a cabinet position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #76
77. This has nothing to do with Obama's judgment. This is about the BS leaks
and the assholes pushing them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #77
78. Again, if the leaks are from a "Clintonite" how does that help Hillary's cause?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #78
80. How do the leaks help Obama? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #80
83. How are they hurting him? And if the Obama camp is upset why aren't they hitting back?
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 01:12 AM by MetricSystem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #64
82. Prosense is a firewalker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #82
85. Hillaryous! But, I've made no secret of the fact that I joined that other site during the primaries.
The convention changed everything for me. Hillary snapped me out of it. Now how's that for full disclosure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
73. It's not as if she was the only he asked to come to Chicago to meet with him.
The rumors are being pumped more out of one side than the other it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #73
75. Exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
86. Oh, geez...................
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 01:41 AM by Beacool
Still with this topic??????

Like a dog with a bone, for crying outloud.

Maybe he offered her the position, maybe he didn't. So, what?

Not all Hillary supporters are salivating at the thought of seeing her in Obama's cabinet. Personally, I hope that she's not in his cabinet. She'll be more independent in the senate than being at his beck and call, but it's her decision to accept it if it's offered.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC