Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama shelves oil company tax after price fall: aide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 08:57 PM
Original message
Obama shelves oil company tax after price fall: aide
http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed2/idUSTRE4B206W20081203

By Jeff Mason and Tom Doggett

CHICAGO/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President-elect Barack Obama is not planning to implement a windfall profit tax on oil companies because prices have dropped below $80 a barrel, an aide said on Tuesday.

"President-elect Obama announced the policy during the campaign because oil prices were above $80 per barrel," an aide on Obama's transition team said. "They are currently below that now and expected to stay below that."

Oil prices have fallen from a record $147 a barrel in July to under $50 this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd still like to pass something to act as a backstop
for any future "spikes". Something along those lines might still serve to stifle shenanigan. Maybe a sliding scale at $80+ a barrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are we observing maneuvering between government and oil companies to see how high their obscene
profits will be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama makes good sense.
After all, what is there to tax right now? OPEC is losing money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. OPEC is already talking about cutting production to push prices up.
Edited on Wed Dec-03-08 09:28 PM by Harvey Korman
And with production in global decline, I'll bet you $100+ oil will be back before you know it.

The idea that we don't need a windfall profits tax because prices are lower now is either incredibly short-sighted or designed to take advantage of short-sightedness to maintain the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. So it is, rather, a "potential future windfall profits tax?"
Preemptive taxation is an idea that would deserve to get laughed out of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. it was the threat that matters and it worked
the big three understood what they faced in an Obama administration if they didn't stop price fixing. Low and behold, $2 gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I don't even know where to begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. i would suggest logical thoughts that then lead to non acrimoneous discussion
but hey, thats just me. take a shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. All right, then I'll give "low and behold" a pass, and rather
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 12:00 AM by Occam Bandage
mention that:

1. The Big Three manufacture cars, and not oil. I've never heard of anyone use "the Big Three" to refer to oil companies, unless you're referring to the ones in China, which I doubt you are.
2. Oil is a global and fungible commodity impacted as much by BRIC and Europe as by America.
3. Even if they could realistically do so, oil companies would not find halving the sell price of their product to be a reasonable tradeoff against paying slightly higher taxes, and certainly foreign oil companies would have no incentive to do so whatsoever.
4. The recent decline in prices is entirely due to lowered demand and investor fear of the demand in BRIC (especially China) collapsing with the economic downturn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. ok
im heading to bed so ill respond to your next tomorrow.



1. Even though there are several refiners of petroleum in America, there are really Three majors thus my usage. Its these refiners that the windfall tax would be levied against.
2. Although oil is a commodity that ebbs and flows, the margins on gasoline do not need to, which is why the outrageous profits seen during high barrel prices where ridiculous.
3 & 4. The point of the threat was to add incentive to oil companies to either begin competing instead of price signaling or the U.S. Government would take the money from them. Although the price of oil has dropped by about $30 a barrel, the price of a gallon of end product has gone down by $2. since you can obtain 44 gallons of gasoline from a barrel, a discrepancy of cost vs retail is evident.

Essentially, the theory holds that the refiners intentionally limit production during high barrel prices to create a simulated drop in supply which is perceived as an increase in demand. During this period of high cost and high demand, margins always increase as do prices and profits. This is accomplished via price signaling. Under these conditions, a windfall tax threat is a surface level threat which communicates the idea that if the public is struggling and the refiner is making billions, we know something is up and we are going to fuck you if you don't stop.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC