Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Few Good Women - Obama ushers in a feminist revolution in foreign policy and national security.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:54 AM
Original message
A Few Good Women - Obama ushers in a feminist revolution in foreign policy and national security.
The New Republic
A Few Good Women by A.J. Rossmiller
Obama ushers in a feminist revolution in foreign policy and national security.
Post Date Wednesday, December 03, 2008

In the Democratic primaries, Barack Obama first distinguished himself in the area of foreign policy; criticizing an atrophied approach to international affairs in both parties, he promised a new approach to diplomacy and national security. As the country waits impatiently for inauguration day, his appointments in those areas indicate that change is indeed on the agenda: In a major adjustment for the realms of foreign policy and national security, his new approach will be led by women.

In fields long dominated by men, a group of female politicians, academics, and policy wonks form the backbone of the Obama administration. Of appointments already designated, the top posts in the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security, both cabinet-level positions, are Hillary Clinton and Janet Napolitano, respectively; our new ambassador to the United Nations will be Susan Rice; and the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the number three position in the Department of Defense, is said to be reserved for Michele Flournoy. For perspective, in the 318 total years those positions have been occupied, women have held them for 16. Or to put it another way, if these women each serve for a single term, they will match the entire combined tenure of women in these positions in the history of the country.

These appointments have garnered little criticism in large part because each appointee is so obviously--indeed, overwhelmingly--qualified. These are not token appointments, but rather a collective reflection of a recent and unprecedented ascendancy of women in these fields. Government positions dealing with war-fighting, tough negotiations, and security have for too long been off limits to women, due to prejudice and stereotypes, as well as structural impediments such as military restrictions against women serving in combat positions, a common path for upward mobility in these fields. But despite these long-lasting barriers, no one now questions the toughness or capabilities of these women. That these appointments have been met by a collective public yawn is itself a remarkable development.

And those are merely the top positions, and ones that are already filled. Burgeoning security superstars Samantha Power and Sarah Sewall are advising the transition on related matters and will likely have significant roles. From the political world, Jane Harman, the former ranking member on the House intelligence committee, has also received attention for her expertise and abilities in these areas as well, and is reportedly under consideration for a top intelligence post. The number of prominent women in this area, and the breadth of their presence--whether in politics, academia, the think tank world, or as civil servants--reveals a fundamental upheaval within the old boys club, rather than a set of outlier promotions. And the depth of their presence in these fields indicates this development is here to stay. Beyond the big names, a phalanx of "next generation" women in foreign policy and security are set to rise through the ranks. Obama's high-profile appointments have the potential to allow for advancement of women in the pipeline who might have otherwise been shut out, as well as providing a strong example for others considering similar careers.

<SNIP>

Obama's appointments are an extremely positive indication of the direction of his administration--not only for women, but for capable management and thought in vital areas of policy. The combination of generational change, different perspectives and backgrounds, and solidification of opportunity for people who have been shut out of these areas is good news for all of us. Best of all, this is just the beginning.

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=113b3e75-80b2-4e4b-9524-67240680de9a
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. k&r. Excellent read. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's like Albright and Rice never existed! How revolutionary! eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yeah, it's like Bill Clinton never appointed Albright,
the first woman to serve as SOS and Bush didn't appoint Rice, the first AA woman to serve in that position. Hillary is the third woman in a row to be appointed SOS.

:shrug:

Good read nonetheless.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, I remember Albright's appt well. She really broke that barrier.
Was Janet Reno the first AG too? Clinton broke those barriers first but glad to see Obama is continuing breaking more. I don't count Rice, when was she good for anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, Reno was the first female AG.
Condi does count, regardless of who she worked for. Actually, Bush has been quite inclusive when it came to his cabinet and close staffers.

I'm glad Obama will continue the trend of his two previous predecessors in appointing women to high level positions.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Actually 3 out of the last 4.

Albright
Powell
Condi (who was National Security Advisor in W's first term)
Hillary


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Oops, how could I forget about Powell.
My bad.........

:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Third out of the last four
Powell was SoS (at least in name). Many of these appointments came from Clinton, although Jeane Kirkpatrick was a Reagan appt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I stand corrected.
Forgot about Powell.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brianna69 Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is fantastic news
Why isn't news like this celebrated with many posts of approval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I approve!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R, its not just the headliners we should focus on
he is staffing up all levels with fine, dedicated people who are on the good side of the issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eshfemme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. I didn't even realize until it got pointed out. I guess I was one of the yawners.
I mean, for the most part, political misgivings aside, the expertise of all the women aren't questionable (I have much more to say about Bush appointees though). I guess, as a beneficiary of the feminist movement, I don't question seeing a capable woman up for a national security job as some older generations would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. good news - thanks for posting

nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. I've been thinking this, too
Just across the board, there are a good many women in this new administration... and (this is really good news, actually) it's not really news.

Lots of good, smart, distinguished women being put to work for the good of the country - HAS to be a very good thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. just shows the ignorance of that group a few weeks ago
who complained that Obama's cabinet was going to be male dominated.

This shouldn't really come as a surprise to anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. article author needs to remember, woman does not necessarily mean feminist n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atimetocome Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Its over the top to call it a revoltion also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does this reflect the glass ceilings in the corporate world?
I could be entirely off base about this -- but I think I remember reading a while back that there are so many outstanding women coming up in government and academia partly because there are fewer opportunities for them in the corporate world. The equally gifted men go off in pursuit of wealth, while the women are left to shine in areas where they can succeed on pure merit.

I would have no complaint about this if it's true -- but it would certainly be an interesting side-effect of the greed-based priorities of the last several decades.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. great post, thank you
I'm very impressed, and no, I don't feel like this is a yawner or has already been done.

It isn't ONE position, it's a lot of them. It isn't just women, it's all minority groups. And they aren't being picked to be the token this or that. They are all overly-qualified and competent.

It's the progressiveness, reflecting the values a younger generation takes for granted (I count myself in that group), combined with the stunning competency and focus on who is right for the job and the team. Breathless competency.

And as a note, even though we take this for granted, the truth is there are many industries where ceilings remain solidly in place. Perspective puts a whole new spin on this, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. You mean the womens groups can't voice their concern about his cabinet anymore?
Oh yeah he's naming Lisa Jackson as the EPA Admin too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC