Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do we fucking need 60 votes for any and all damn Bills to pass the Senate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:43 PM
Original message
Why do we fucking need 60 votes for any and all damn Bills to pass the Senate?
Can someone explain it to me, cause I don't remember it always working this way.

Is this something relatively new? I always thought that a majority was a majority.

I realize that there were exceptions, but I didn't realize that every bill is an exception.

Color me uninformed on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Republicans have broken all fillibuster records. Figures since they are basically the Southern
Party now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because if they don't have 60, any Republican can filibuster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And the Democrats don't have the guts to make them really do it
for more than a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's not "guts" - it is that this is the way it is in the Senaet rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let the idiots filibuster, how long can they talk for anyways?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Technically it's 3/5 of those present and voting
I don't know why they are saying it's a hard 60 because according to the Senate rules it's not...it's 3/5 of those present and voting, which the Democrats had tonight. At the very least, the 60 number should be lowered to be 3/5 of all Senators, and there are only 99 right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's actually 3/5 of those "duly chosen and sworn"
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 11:59 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
So it's 60 unless there is a vacancy. Obama's seat is vacant.

Invoking cloture usually requires a three-fifths vote of the entire Senate—“threefifths
of the Senators duly chosen and sworn.” If there are no vacancies, therefore,
60 Senators must vote to invoke cloture. In contrast, most other votes require only
a simple majority (that is, 51%) of the Senators present and voting, assuming that
those Senators constitute a quorum. In the case of a cloture vote, the key is the
number of Senators voting for cloture, not the number voting against. Failing to vote
on a cloture motion has the same effect as voting against the motion: it deprives the
motion of one of the 60 votes needed to agree to it.

http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/RL30360.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's a set up argument. The Republicans didn't need it to ram their garbage
down our throats when they were in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC