Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beyond the 2008 Election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 10:19 AM
Original message
Beyond the 2008 Election


{1} "…..(W)e as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a ‘thing-oriented’ society to a ‘person-oriented’ society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered."
--Martin Luther King, Jr.; A Time to Break Silence; April 4, 1967.

Although I never met Martin Luther King, Jr., he has been a major influence on my thinking. One of my friends knew Rev. King, and I remember him once saying to me that only he who attempts the ridiculous can ever hope to achieve the impossible. I’ve thought about that during the 2008 election season, when a brown-skinned kid with a funny name from a single-parent family was running for President. Now that was just as surely ridiculous, as it was part of Martin’s dream.

I am an ideologue: I subscribe to the belief that the Constitution of the United States offers us the only realistic avenue towards repairing our nation. That concept may seem ridiculous in the face of all the evidence confronting us today. Although the Bush-Cheney administration has done the most damage to the Constitution, they were not alone: many members of the democratic party in Washington, DC, have also betrayed that document.

And so it was that I backed the improbable campaign of Barack Obama, the Constitutional attorney who promised to do everything possible to repair the damage, and to attempt to heal our nation. I’m glad I did, and I certainly still have high hopes for his years in office. A presidential candidate who quotes phrases from men such as Malcolm X and Frederick Douglas speaks my language.

I am aware of the enormity of the problems he faces. And I understand that, especially in the beginning of his administration, he will have to make choices that I do not necessarily agree with. Yet I also know, without question, that this country cannot pursue a foreign policy which is based upon racism, materialism, and militarism abroad, and hope to establish a democracy that values human beings at home. That is beyond ridiculous.

{2} "Somehow this madness must cease. We must stop now. I speak as a child of God and brother to the suffering poor of Vietnam. I speak for those whose land is being laid waste, whose homes are being destroyed, whose culture is being subverted. I speak for the poor of America who are paying the double price of smashed hopes at home and death and corruption in Vietnam. I speak as a citizen of the world, for the world stands aghast at the path we have taken. I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be ours."
--Martin Luther King, Jr.; A Time to Break Silence; April 4, 1967.

Selecting an administration based upon the concepts behind President Lincoln’s "team of rivals" is, in theory, a good idea. And it may be that such an administration will begin with more conservative voices in foreign affairs, and – hopefully – more liberal voices in the domestic positions. That is a start. But there is also a danger in that this is, by definition, the position taken by the originators of the neoconservative movement. And that movement has proven to be anything but democratic, and has little regard for the Bill of Rights or the concept of a balance of powers between the three branches of the federal government.

It is unlikely, for example, that those who participated in the crimes that are known as the Iran-Contra scandal yesterday, are going to favor the rule of law today. Hence, while I can certainly understand why it is tactically necessary for President-elect Obama to keep Robert Gates on at this time, I still have serious reservations. And those serious reservations grow into solemn concerns when his influence is not counter-balanced by the influence of a rival on that administrative team.

We cannot hope to conquer the crises that we face today in the towns and cities across the country while we continue to occupy by force a country that we invaded based upon lies. We cannot hope for social and economic justice in this country, when the elected officials in Washington, DC, continue to support the heads of banks and industries that have declared a cruel form of class warfare upon the majority of the citizens of the country. We cannot hope to deal with the environmental problems which confront us, when some people are encouraged to capitalize on the exploitation of the land, air and water that we depend upon to survive.

Recent events should provide ample evidence that it is not only republican politicians who are the stumbling blocks in the path to repairing our democracy. Therefore, while I will continue to support democratic candidates in general, I recognize that it is essential for the progressive/liberal grass roots to pressure the politicians in Washington, DC relentlessly. We will need to study, accept, and practice the tactics of Martin Luther King, Jr., in this struggle. For, indeed, that is the only way in which we can insure that we have a voice in Washington, DC.

Thank you,
H2O Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Your last paragraph is so true and so necessary.
The nature of controlling every branch of government will lay naked similarities to that which the people have rejected. With all the smug confidence of the conservative third way wing, there will be no where to hide nor no one to blame for any lack of accountability and there is a danger in that for them and the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right.
There are two major parties represented in Washington, DC, but they are not representative of all the classes of people, and they certainly haven't represented all classes of people. I believe that Barack Obama has opened a door for us, but we still have to walk through it ourselves, if we expect to be seated at the table. That is a requirement of democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Recent Election
Is proof that the mind games the ReCons always play no longer work as they used to. However, that is not a message they are open to. The last 24 hours regarding the bailout, where senators from Tennessee have championed the interests of foreign car makers over those of Americans, has presented a powerful statement regarding their party and in my estimation will continue their downfall. While the American people don't like these bailouts, if there has to be one, they'd prefer the car companies get help rather than Wall Street, or so recent polls say.

As for Obama, I think he means to walks softly and enter rooms so quietly that he will establish his presence before anyone realizes he has taken up occupancy. I read recently that Conyers said that Obama fully intends to go after Rove. As I don't think Conyers would say such a thing without cause I consider that an indicator of things to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Like any common virus,
the republican species will mutate and adopt. They aren't going anywhere.

I am convinced that President Obama will be working towards progressive goals. Those on DU who are saying that he is "right-of-center" are entitled to view him in that manner. I do not know of many right-of-center people who quote Malcolm X and Frerick Douglas while campaigning. But I think it is essential that there is an organized, active progressive/liberal gras roots movement, encouraging him to do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The Isolation Ward?
I do think the country is wising up and push is coming to shove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Interesting Points Made On 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Buchanan said if the auto industry goes down the ReCons will lose the rust belt and blue collar workers forever.

O'Donnell said while the ReCons thought they had scored they in fact been played cause the dems got what they always wanted, and that is the money taken from TARP. And while Mitch M. is crowing about having held his people together it will be a totally different story when he has only 41 or 42 senators on his side.

Hildebrand, who wrote that piece on HuffPo that got progressives steamed. was on. very tempered, and said that it's not a right, left or center issue but what is best for the country overall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Cycles.
There are cycles going on within other cycles right now. As the democratic party takes more power in Washington, DC, we witness the republican party's fracture lines. Some within their party will look to exploit the fractures, while others try to repair them. But as the economy grows worse, those fractures will become greater. There is nothing more volitale than a group who recognizes that they have been had, and that is the sure future within their party.

We see the same fractures within the democratic party. Things were held together through the 2008 election, but that was in large part due to the "common enemy" which took on George W. Bush's smirking face. Yet, within two months post-election, we see the most foolish of fights going on within what is supposed to be a progressive/liberal internet community. The same people who suggest that we should trust the "centrists" in Washington are, perhaps by no coincidence, the same folks who insist that DU is a rather insignificant group, so far as being representative of our party. But the truth is that DU is perfectly representative of a segment of the progressive/liberal community today -- in fact, it could not be otherwise.

As the progressive/liberal wing, it is essential that we recognize that our allies are not exclusive to the democratic party: we should be using this period of time to expand linkages with other left-leaning individuals and groups within the country. This is, of course, the idea that King had when he attempted to unite the civil rights and anti-war movements. More, he recognized the under-represented poor as natural allies of his movement.

That's where we are today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Yes, it is our time to become involved.
That's what a door left open is for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. I like this post
I kind of wish I had something pertinent to add to it, but I got nothing. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you for drawing the parallels
between MLK's connection of an unjust foreign war to domestic justice, and the same connection that exists today, abetted by concerted class warfare being promoted by federal fiscal policies.

I think King would feel glad to see his ideas so well carried forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. We will not solve
our growing need for "energy" by expanding our military occupation of the Middle East. It may provide what appears to be temporary relief, but it is a dead end street.

Nor we we solve the problem by drilling in the wilderness in Alaska, or destroying the environment in the northeastern states by raping the environment for coal and gas. Again, it may create the illusion of temporary relief, but we are merely becoming intoxicated by the toxic wastes we are poisoning ourselves with.

Santa God is not going to fly down from the sky and save us, either. It won't happen. That's a delusion.

It can only happen by our becoming a better and more just people, and reaching higher ground. And that involves undergoing those rapid changes that Martin Luther King, Jr., spoke of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I hope
that you have had an opportunity to explore change.gov, and lend your vision and eloquence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R. Thank you for your thoughtful essay. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well done
(and what isn't if it's yours?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Thank you.
Much appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. And there were those here just last month
wondering what the purpose of DU would be going forward now that we have a DEM candidate in the White House and majorities in both the House and Senate.

Some DEMs are better than others at serving the people. And some only care for themselves as we have seen played out this week. DU and other internet forums like this are vital to the progressive voice being heard.

As for PE Obama and his choice of retaining Gates... I have read here that possibly his choice will allow him to pull troops out with more authority and trust under Gates leadership than if he had installed a new person. This makes sense to me but I will wait to see if the troops are moving out before I shout any resounding YAYs at this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. There are
potential "pros and cons" with every person appointed. If Gates helps to bring an end to the war of occupation in Iraq, I'll be pleased. I understand that he can play an important role in doing just that. But only time will tell if he does that, or if he attempts to stretch it out. In the mean time, people will continue to suffer and die for the Bush-Cheney lies that led us to war, and no one is being held responsible for those lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. Really good post...
Error: you can only recommend threads which were started in the past 24 hours


Well written and I agree...thank you!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC