Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SCOTUS Watch

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 10:26 AM
Original message
SCOTUS Watch
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 10:28 AM by IWantAnyDem
No. 08A469
Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant
v.
Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State

Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Case Nos.: (SC 18264)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.
Dec 9 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Cort Wrotnowski filed. (Distributed)


IF this case is not taken today, all hopes of the Birth Certificate Cultists are dead. It won't make the list of denials until Monday, though.

Ironically, the case seeks to stay the vote of the electoral college, which is Monday. So it makes the list today or all stay requests regarding the electoral college vote are dead, though there could be emergency requests taken up over the weekend. The chance of that lays somewhere between slim and none
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think this site is the one that is updated first
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 10:43 AM by Hokie
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/08ordersofthecourt.html

The ones for the individual cases lag by several hours and it probably will not be updated until Monday when they issue a denial. Watch for a Miscellaneous Order" dated 12/12/08. This will contain a list of cases that are certified to be be considered before the court voted upon at today's conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. The court didn't grant certification today in the Wrotnowsky case
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 02:52 PM by Hokie
I am sure the denial will be published Monday. The crazies will just get crazier. I think today should be the end of this nonsense. The electors vote Monday. From there it is up to Congress to certify on January 8.

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/121208zr.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. But some of the lunatic freeper are holding out for one last thing:
they think Darth Vader will refuse to read the votes out in the Senate.

Nutjobs, one and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What a bunch of idiots
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 03:05 PM by Hokie
It is going to be fun to watch Cheney have to preside over the election of Obama/Biden, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nope.....
This case, like Donofrio's before it, is on the "Natural Born Citizen" claim.

It's Berg v. Obama and it's clones that are blathering about the Birth Certificate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes, but the Birth Certificate Cultists have put their hope in this one
and this one is the last one that will be taken up in conference before the Electoral College votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The cultists in general.....
...have their hopes on ANY court case being the "Great White Hope" that proves their claims.

The constant string of fails should be a clue to them.

Still, Berg's at SCOTUS still, and Alan Keyes crazy Dentist/Attorney just appealed her "Lightfoot v. Bowen" case to SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Once the Electoral College votes, though, the SCOTUS has no potential
jurisdiction under the consitution.

It's done. It's up to Congress to make the decision after Monday. Nothing in the world can change that as there is no way you could amend the constitution that quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And it wasn't granted...
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 03:01 PM by IWantAnyDem
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/121208zr.pdf

(ORDER LIST: 555 U.S.)
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2008
CERTIORARI GRANTED
08-295 08-307
) ) )
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., ET AL. V. BAILEY, PEARLIE, ET AL.COMMON LAW SETTLEMENT COUNSEL V. BAILEY, PEARLIE, ET AL.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The
cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted
for oral argument.
08-310
POLAR TANKERS, INC. V. VALDEZ, AK
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. There's the stake through the heart of
this particular bit of Freeper idiocy. The chances that this would be granted cert were less than being able to jump off the roof and fly to the moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC