Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP Analysis Franken ahead by 8+ votes/// Both camps slash ballot challenges to speed count end

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:29 PM
Original message
AP Analysis Franken ahead by 8+ votes/// Both camps slash ballot challenges to speed count end
The Canvassing Board requested both camps to reduce the number of challenges and Franken's camp is going to reduce their challenges to 500, while the Coleman camp is reducing to 1000 ballots. This should speed up the final decision considerably. Also the AP and Franken camps ballot by ballot analysis appears to give Franken a very slight lead:




As both campaigns reduce challenges, Franken is confident he will pick up hundreds of votes.




http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/36146949.html?elr=KArksi8cyaiUncacyi8cyaiUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU

The AP concluded that Franken stands to gain about 200 votes on Coleman, enough to put him ahead, because the unofficial count has Coleman up by about 192 votes as of Sunday.

clip

Al Franken's campaign on Sunday pledged to reduce the number of ballots it is challenging to fewer than 500 in the U.S. Senate race against GOP Sen. Norm Coleman.

Meanwhile, the Coleman campaign said it will reduce the number of its challenges by more than half, to fewer than 1,000.

Both camps, which between them had questioned more than 6,000 ballots from the Nov. 4 election, said they are reducing challenges after the state Canvassing Board asked them to do so on Friday.

Both men had more than 2,000 active challenges pending, with Franken having more than 2,200. His campaign said that figure would drop to under 500 by Tuesday.

Coleman's campaign had fewer challenges, but also pledged smaller reductions. The incumbent had about 2,000 challenges active; a spokesman said Sunday that that number will drop by more than half, to under 1,000.

Fritz Knaak, a Coleman lawyer, said in a prepared statement that while the campaign still has concerns about the standards used to challenge the ballots, it will nonetheless reduce its challenge numbers.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ramsey County Elections Manager Joe Mansky refuses...
...to review-and-sort Rejected Absentee Ballots, as most counties are doing.

Ramsey is one of the most Democratic counties. It includes St. Paul.

What happens to the Rejected Absentee Ballots there will probably decide the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do you know if Frankin can take this to court and force them to count the ballots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Last month, Ramsey County refused to provide information...
...about their Rejected Absentee Ballots, and the Franken campaign got a court order forcing them to.

I'm hoping the Franken campaign will go to the same court for an order either forcing Ramsey County to review those ballots or to hand them over to the court to review.

I don't know why the Franken campaign hasn't done so already.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, you don't want to get too pushy with these court criters. They have huge egos and they don't
like it when they think you are either being pushy or using them. You have to be real nice to them. I am sure that Frankin has good legal council and will bring this up at the appropriate time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm actually pretty certain
this will be settled by Coleman's plea to the supreme court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The MN Supreme Court has at least 3 options.
1) Status quo: say counties can choose to sort those ballots or not.

2) Order all counties to sort those ballots.

3) Order all counties NOT to sort those ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Any projection on when the S Ct. will decide? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The MN Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC