Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are cabinet posts rewarding for senators/governors?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
changemonger Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 02:10 PM
Original message
Why are cabinet posts rewarding for senators/governors?
I don't quite get it, but then again I'm not an expert. I read somewhere that Blagojevich was asking for a cabinet seat or even an ambassadorship in exchange for the appointment of Obama advisor Valerie Jarett. I wonder why a governor of a state as big as Illinois would prefer to become a secretary of state or even an ambassador instead for a maximum of 8 years . Why was it important for i.e Hillary Clinton to become SoS when she could have had a long carreer in the senate ? Why would Janet Napolitano accept the HSS - someone hardly ever mentioned - post when she could have stayed the popular governor she was and probably even compete for McCain's senate seat ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Prestige in some cases.
In others -- like Blago -- they figure they aren't going to get re-elected as governor.

For Hillary, I think (just guessing here) she saw SoS as a better job -- more high profile -- than junior Senator. There are lots of senators ahead of her in seniority, and they would always get the plumb leadership positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
changemonger Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. more high profile ?
Well, I don't know. She can't stay SoS for more than 8 years and after that her political career is pretty much over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. He was looking for $$$
in one conversation it was said that the Dept. of Energy was a money maker, and the best take could be had as the Chairman of a Non-Profit Organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC