Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richard Nixon essentially appointed the next President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:52 PM
Original message
Richard Nixon essentially appointed the next President
Edited on Tue Dec-30-08 09:57 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
I remember it well. At the time Agnew resigned Nixon was already sinking into Watergate and it was recognized that Nixon's VP pick would become President if Nixon were impeached and convicted, or resigned.

And the general reaction was, "yeah... well that sucks. But those are the rules of the thing."

It didn't cross anyone's mind to put forward a theory that Nixon's responsibility of picking a new VP was void because he was suspected of a bunch of crimes, or because his approval ratings were low.

I don't know where this attitude of free-form grab-ass with the rules came from. Has the combination of Clinton impeachment and GW Bush infected the Dems with pug-like contempt for the law? This has nothing to do with whether Blago is a crook. The only pertinent question is, "Is he the Governor of Illinois?" If Charles-freaking-Manson happened to be the Governor of Illinois then it would be his pick to make.

Any system based on a constitution and laws will yield unpopular outcomes sometimes. That's the nature of the thing.

________

On an only tangentially related note, Bush rescinding a pardon is bullshit and I hope it's struck down. The executive pardon power is part of the overall criminal justice system and the idea of revoking a pardon is an insult to the spirit of prohibiting double-jeopardy. When you get a favorable result from the criminal justice system that's supposed to be that. The absurd reduction of the reversible pardon concept is a president letting some people out of jail and a candidate vowing that when elected he will reinstate their convictions and put them back in jail. It's a joke... some guy could be released and re-imprisoned in an eight year cycle for the rest of his life based on who wins elections. That's just not America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Talk to George, he's the one revoking the pardon. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. his claim is that he didn't know what the case was about.......
....then after he learned about it, he revoked the pardon. So the only question now is, if he knew so little about the case, why did he feel the need to offer a pardon? And shouldn't he have looked into the case before pardoning the guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. IIRC, Congress had a big hand in the whole matter. They sent a reality-check delegation to Nixon...
... to tell him it was all over, and when Gerry Ford's name came up his fellow Congressmen asked him to for God's sake search his heart and conscience because the nation couldn't take much more of this. In between they planned ahead: Agnew had to be gotten rid of because if he remained veep, he would of necessity become president on Nixon's departure.

I don't remember the details at this point, but I do remember that Congress played quite a role behind the scenes.

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's correct, as with the Senate seat, Ford, as per 25th Amendment, required Cong. confirmation.
Edited on Tue Dec-30-08 10:39 PM by beat tk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ford was on the Warren Commission too
A lot of bad pennies show up all over the place.

When he was appointed not many knew who was on
the Warren commission and the consequence of not knowing
at those times, we only had the library, books and periodicals to research things.


There is some major powers being played behind the scenes Today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC