Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What "bipartisanship" in Washington means (Greenwald)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Christine Babineau Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:48 AM
Original message
What "bipartisanship" in Washington means (Greenwald)
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 10:59 AM by Christine Babineau
To support the new Bush-supported FISA law:

GOP - 48-0

Dems - 12-36

To compel redeployment of troops from Iraq:

GOP - 0-49

Dems - 24-21

To confirm Michael Mukasey as Attorney General:

GOP - 46-0

Dems - 7-40

To confirm Leslie Southwick as Circuit Court Judge:

GOP - 49-0

Dems - 8-38

Kyl-Lieberman Resolution on Iran:

GOP - 46-2

Dems - 30-20

To condemn MoveOn.org:

GOP - 49-0

Dems - 23-25

The Protect America Act:

GOP - 44-0

Dems - 20-28

Declaring English to be the Government's official language:

GOP - 48-1

Dems - 16-33

The Military Commissions Act:

GOP - 53-0

Dems - 12-34

To renew the Patriot Act:

GOP - 54-0

Dems - 34-10

Cloture Vote on Sam Alito's confirmation to the Supreme Court:

GOP - 54-0

Dems - 18-25

Authorization to Use Military Force in Iraq:

GOP - 48-1

Dems - 29-22


"Leaving aside how shallow and, shall we say, unserious is this endless chirping for more "bipartisanship" -- as though it's a magic feel-good formula for resolving actual policy differences -- it's hard to imagine how there could possibly be any more "bipartisanship" in Washington even if that were the only goal. Other than formally disbanding as a party -- or granting a permanent proxy of their collective vote to Mitch McConnell -- how could Congressional Democrats possibly be more accommodating than they already are?"



More: http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/01/30/bipartisanship/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lockstep...
Holy crap. And these dittoheads try to claim Dems are a cult (Obama's supporters)? Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. the bush era has ended
and that's selective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thank you Cali
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. They gotta learn to suck on being the minority and to like it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. And which numbers are increasing and decreasing?
The total numbers of GOP votes or Democratic votes?

Just something to keep in mind.

But I agree that we should highlight how often Democrats have "crossed the aisle" and how rarely the GOP does. Then let's poll the American people and ask what they think of the "obstructionist" GOP. After that, it's time for popcorn and watching heads explode (and the GOP implode as moderates and conservatives attack one another).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC