Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOL! Krugman: "All your downside are belong to us"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:03 PM
Original message
LOL! Krugman: "All your downside are belong to us"
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 01:09 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Whatever else you can say about Paul Krugman, it's remarkable having a Nobel-prize winning political blog geek.

He already uses "wing-nut" routinely. Can "Moran" be far behind?
All your downside are belong to us

AIG is much in the news these days. But I’m not sure, even now, if people are getting the ultimate message.

AIG is in trouble because it wrote many credit default swaps, in effect guaranteeing others against losses it lacked the resources to cover. We, the taxpayers, are now covering those losses, for fear that not doing so would cause a financial catastrophe. But this means that US taxpayers have now assumed the downside risks for all of AIG’s counterparties.

In effect, then, we’ve already nationalized a large part of the financial industry’s potential losses.

So at the very least, we have a right to know who the counterparties are: who are we subsidizing, here? And beyond that, shouldn’t there be some quid pro quo? Shouldn’t the US government get something in return for taking on so much of the risk?

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/03/all-your-downside-are-belong-to-us/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how many letters the NYT gets
pointing out the grammatical mistake. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Been a while seen I have seen reference to that quote.
Good sign that the fad has long since passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. "I was writing my blog, and I accidentally the whole headline. Is this bad?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. I loved how
a couple weeks ago, when asked about the Santelli "rant", he said that if you mentioned a bubble on CNBC before September, you were called a Bubble Head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sup dawg, I herd u liked credit default swaps,
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 01:14 PM by Occam Bandage
so we put a collateralized debt obligation in yo mortgage-backed securities portfolio so u can create undue risk while u create undue risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Extend a Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. lol, that's funny but xkcd
still holds the 'meme density' record with this...

http://xkcd.com/550/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. How is bubble formed? How is bubble formed? How economy get recession?
They need to do way instain markets> who swap thier derivitives. becuse these derivitives cant display risk?
it was on the news this mroing a bank in ny who had lost its three bilions. they are showing the three bilions back in new york too lady to rest my pary are with the investers who lost his investmints ; i am truley sorry for your lots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. I can understand propping up banks. I do not understand putting money into an insurance
company that will just dish it out to those who lost bets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC