Senate Republicans Threaten To Filibuster President Obama Judicial Nominations They Don't Like!

[Better Believe It]

The Politico and Roll Call both reported on a letter sent by Senate Republicans to President Obama stating that if they "are not consulted on, and approve of, a nominee from our states," they would filibuster judicial nominations.

So if that happens will Senate Reid wave the surrender flag and permit "phantom filibusters", challenge Republicans to real Senate floor filibusters until cloture is achieved or change Senate rules to permit an up and down majority vote on judicial appointments?

--------------------------------------------------


41 Senate Republicans Send Letter To President Obama Urging Consultation On Judicial Nominees

March 2, 2009

President Barack H. Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President:

We look forward to working with you as you consider nominees for the federal judiciary. Unfortunately, the judicial appointments process has become needlessly acrimonious. We would very much like to improve this process, and we know you would as well. It is in that spirit that we write early on to suggest two steps your Administration can take to achieve that shared goal.

First, in the beginning of his Administration, your predecessor demonstrated his desire to improve the judicial confirmation process by nominating to the circuit courts two of President Clinton’s previous judicial nominees, Judge Barrington Parker to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and Judge Roger Gregory to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. It would help change the tone in Washington if your Administration would take the same bipartisan step. Because the last Congress sadly set the modern record for the fewest circuit court confirmations in a President’s final Congress, there are plenty of well-qualified nominees with bipartisan support from whom to choose. For example, Peter Keisler has been praised repeatedly by colleagues in both the public and private sector, Democrats and Republicans, and has earned accolades from major media observers, like The Washington Post. And Judges Glen Conrad and Paul Diamond both enjoyed bipartisan support and have outstanding records on the federal trial bench.

Second, as our Democratic colleagues have emphasized for the last several years, the process of federal appointments is a shared constitutional responsibility. We respect your responsibility to nominate suitable candidates for the federal bench. And as a former colleague, we know you appreciate the Senate’s unique constitutional responsibility to provide or withhold its Advice and Consent on nominations. The principle of senatorial consultation (or senatorial courtesy) is rooted in this special responsibility, and its application dates to the Administration of George Washington. Democrats and Republicans have acknowledged the importance of maintaining this principle, which allows individual senators to provide valuable insights into their constituents’ qualifications for federal service.

We hope your Administration will consult with us as it considers possible nominations to the federal courts from our states. Regretfully, if we are not consulted on, and approve of, a nominee from our states, the Republican Conference will be unable to support moving forward on that nominee. Despite press reports that the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee now may be considering changing the Committee’s practice of observing senatorial courtesy, we, as a Conference, expect it to be observed, even-handedly and regardless of party affiliation. And we will act to preserve this principle and the rights of our colleagues if it is not.

Because of the profound impact that life-tenured federal judges can have in our society, the Founders made their appointment a shared constitutional responsibility. We look forward to working with you to discharge this important duty in the best interest of our country.


Sincerely,
All Republican Senators


Cc: The Honorable Patrick J. Leahy


###
SENATE REPUBLICAN COMMUNICATIONS CENTER

http://republican.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=blogs.view&blog_id=3c522434-76e5-448e-9ead-1ec214b881ac

[ej510]

1. Who gives a fuck? We will have 59 Senators by then.

We will get Snowe or Collins and they will pass confirmation.

[WeDidIt]

2. Senate Republicans Call For Nuclear Option To End Filibuster Of Judicial Nominaitons

Oh what a difference a couple of elections make.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4257537

[and-justice-for-all]

3. Fuck off repuke assholes...

We do not need you and your opinions do not mean jack fuckin' shit.

[Better Believe It]

4. People for the American Way: "Voters gave President Obama a mandate to appoint judges"

People for the American Way
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 3, 2009
10:20 AM

Republicans Threaten to Block Obama’s Judges

WASHINGTON - March 3 - In a letter released yesterday, all 41 Senate Republicans threatened to filibuster President Obama’s judicial nominees unless they were given veto power over judges from their states. The letter also demanded that President Obama renominate ultra-conservative Bush nominees like Peter Keisler, Glen Conrad and Paul Diamond.

“The Republicans are doing everything in their power to cement their reputation as the ‘Party of No,’” said People For the American Way President Kathryn Kolbert. “Voters gave President Obama a mandate to appoint judges who understand that the Constitution and the laws provide for equal justice for all. Now, before a single nomination has been announced, Republicans are threatening to block every single one of Obama’s nominees. That’s chutzpah.”

Kolbert pointed out that over the last eight years, the vast majority of President Bush’s judges were confirmed by the Senate, despite the fact that President Bush refused to include Senators in the process. President Obama’s counsel Gregory Craig has already reached out to Senators about potential nominees.

http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/03/03-7

[Better Believe It]

5. Wall Street Journal: GOP Senators to Obama: Fill Judicial Vacancies With Bush Nominees

GOP Senators to Obama: Fill Judicial Vacancies With Bush Nominees
by Ashby Jones
Wall Street Journal
March 3, 2009

Back in January, we penned an article in the Journal in which we tried to gauge how much impact President Obama could have in shaping the federal courts, especially at the appellate level. Our conclusion: quite a bit, especially if he gets buy-in from a handful of Republican senators.

But buy-in might not be easy to get. The first sign of that emerged Monday in the form of a letter from all 41 Senate Republicans to the White House. The letter encouraged Obama to fill vacant spots on the federal bench with those picks of President Bush who weren’t confirmed during Bush’s term. Here’s the story, from Politico.

The Republican senators said Obama would “change the tone in Washington” if he were to renominate Bush nominees like Peter Keisler, Glen Conrad and Paul Diamond. They also asked Obama to continue seeking senators’ consultation about potential nominees from their respective states.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/03/03/gop-senators-to-obama-fill-judgeships-with-bush-nominees/

[bluestateguy]

6. Let's hold a "Justice Sunday" event to urge an up or down vote

I'm sure James Dobson and Focus on the Family will be happy to help us out with that.

[damntexdem]

7. Time to nuke that strategy.

Let them try, then change the rules -- as they threatened to do.

[Dr Fate]

8. Taking their orders directly from Rush Limbaugh again- that is more than apparent.

Rahm was right- Rush is the force behind that God-forsaken party.

[frylock]

9. the GOP and their attempted jedi mind tricks are pure comedy gold..

it's as if the last 8 years never happened. this is what happens when you appease these fignuts.