Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Limbaugh's ratings doubled since his Obama attacks, as some pundits have reported? OK, how?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 11:10 PM
Original message
Has Limbaugh's ratings doubled since his Obama attacks, as some pundits have reported? OK, how?
Not to make this whole ridiculous upping of Rush Limbaugh as the head of the GOP (and who wants America to fail) even more obtuse, but it turns out that various news pundits are saying Limbaugh's ratings have doubled (like his weight gain) since this recent episode. The Washington Post has apparently bit the bait too.

Well, it turns out that Howard Kurtz spawned the myth and then Chris Matthews carried on the story. Who knows where else this assumption has landed and is being seen as the "truth", but Media Matters does a great job getting to the heart of this untruth:

The only evidence Kurtz offered to support his claim that Limbaugh's "ratings have nearly doubled" was a quote from Talkers magazine publisher Michael Harrison, whose "research" suggested that Limbaugh's ratings had grown dramatically in recent days:

"The people who love him are a very small segment of the public," said Michael Harrison, publisher of Talkers magazine, whose research indicates that Limbaugh's weekly audience has spiked from 14.2 million to about 25 million since the controversy escalated. "A lot of people still think he's a shock jock, a hatemonger, a right-wing radical, or hold his personal baggage against him."

http://mediamatters.org/items/200903080013?f=h_latest


So just what data is used to get to the assumption that Limbaugh's "ratings have nearly doubled"?

Harrison said his estimate of a big spike in Limbaugh's audience this week -- some 25 million, a figure quoted in The Post -- was also based on his discussions with station program directors around the country. Although there's no actual survey data to support such a figure, Harrison said "it's what we're hearing, based on the e-mails, the calls, all the buzz this controversy is generating. We put a little bit of our interpretation on it, added it all up, and that puts you in the ballpark."

http://mediamatters.org/items/200903080013?f=h_latest


What a fabulous explanation! Putting a little interpretation and "adding it all up" is exactly the magic formula for Rush Limbaugh's antics. Rush's weight has perhaps doubled since he started his career. He is a picture of gluttony and narcissistic selfishness in its highest form.

Maybe that's where these oafs got it mixed up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, in other words, he pulled the figure out of his ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. The only thing that has doubled is... the size of his ass.
.
.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I believe it. The GOP is moribund. The only one that acts as if it isn't, is the fat junkie
Edited on Sun Mar-08-09 11:22 PM by Sarah Ibarruri
And he's the one Repukes listen to because he cheers them up and gives them hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Orange Jeff Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's not a WAG... It's not even a SWAG...
It's a PIDOOMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. He has got a lot of focus lately probably has got higher ratings out of peoples curiosity alone.>
Edited on Sun Mar-08-09 11:59 PM by cooolandrew
Maybe not double ratings but folks will have tuned in to see what's going on. I don't imagine it will last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. As you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC