Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The NY Times asks if Obama is a socialist.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 09:57 AM
Original message
The NY Times asks if Obama is a socialist.
If anybody was still wondering whether the NYTimes was carrying the GOP agenda or not, this latest interview should give us an answer.

As has been reported these last few weeks, the GOP has stopped using the "liberal" attack and replaced it by a "socialist" attack. They have been calling the reforms proposed "socialist", and attacking leading Democrats as "socialists" even though only people who do not understand what socialism is could even ask themselves if anybody among the leading Democrats was even close to the European social-democracy, let alone full blow socialism.

However, we could have expected better from the paper of record "The New York Times", which the right continues to call a liberal newspaper.

Some of us have been questioning whether the Times, just as NBC or Time Magazine, was taking its questions directly from the GOP talking points emailed directly to them every morning.

The answer was given to us in this interview :eyes:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/us/politics/08obama-text.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all

Obama’s Interview Aboard Air Force One
...

The first six weeks have given people a glimpse of your spending priorities. Are you a socialist as some people have suggested?

A. You know, let’s take a look at the budget – the answer would be no.
...


Seriously, a reporter from a leading paper in the nation is asking such a stupid question?

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/times-reporter-defends-asking-obama-if-hes-a-socialist/

Of course, both the Times and Newsweek justify the question by saying it led Obama to an interesting answer, but, seriously? How was Baker able to ask such a stupid question without laughing.:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. The NYT gave the game away
with that non-existant "scandal" about McCain and Ms Iseman.

It was a nothing-to-it story which actually helped McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. I thought Judith Miller put paid to the "liberal"---or even "truthful"---myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama must represent real change. If he didn't, they wouldn't be shouting this b.s.
Clearly, many of the "powers that be" don't like what he's trying to do.
They probably did the same thing to FDR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Meh.
Reading the whole article, I really don't see the big deal. Especially given the follow-ups to that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. "Reading the whole article" is the key...
not just taking some blogger's word for it.

Speaking of "agendas"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think it's a stupid question. It's an interview. Were there any other
questions where the answer is "no"? Are they stupid questions too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. You do realize that...
there is this whole tribe, at least as large as the wingnuts on the other side, populated by people who have no idea that an interview including questions they don't like can still be a proper interview.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. The mushroom cloud of socialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, batshit-- why shouldn't a reporter ask...
the President, any President, to clear up a meme gaining popularity? The question was, if anything, PRO Obama by allowing him to answer the rightwing charges of socialism, communism, or any other dread -isms the wingnuts can come up with.

(RTFA-- Read The Fucking Article before commenting on it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I read the article. Sorry, he did not answer any charges here. Nobody expected him to say Yes,
even if he had been a socialist (not that there would be something wrong there anyway, but he still would not answered yes).

The only reason to ask this question (aside from being a particularly inane interviewer asking questions for which everybody knows what the answer will be), is to repeat the meme. Sorry, I have to disagree with you on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. Seems the White House agrees.
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/03/09/obama_calls_back_reporters.html


Obama Calls Back Reporters
The audio of President Obama's phone call to New York Times reporters to explain why he dismissed a question about whether he was a socialist suggests the White House really doesn't want the term to stick.

Said Obama: "It was hard for me to believe that you were entirely serious about that socialist question."

Nonetheless, expect at least some Republicans to continue their strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. I seem to recall so much of the MSM querying if junior were a fascist
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yah, nobody asked if B*sh was a Nazi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's strange..I don't remember anyone
asking if gw bush was a fucking fascist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC