http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1883961,00.htmlI think the key to this is the pukes burning fear of getting close to that magic 60 number. It scares me that nearly half of Minnesotans would favor another election. That better not happen!
"As frustrated as they appear to be with the court case, Minnesotans aren't all desperate to have someone go to Washington right away. A recent Rasmussen poll of 500 Minnesotans found that about 46% supported conducting another election altogether. "I think that since this issue landed in front of a panel of three judges it has become increasingly clumsy," says James Crockarell, a Coleman voter. "The election is now in the hands of the court and out of the hands of the people. The fairest thing that speaks to the people is to have a new election."
Nevertheless, election experts say no legal precedent or basis exists for a re-vote in Minnesota law (A re-vote was conducted in a 1974 New Hampshire U.S. Senate race. But the margin was just two votes). Besides, as the state retrenches in the face of a $4.5 billion deficit, another election would be costly, even if feasible. Secretary of State Mark Ritchie says it would cost the state between $3.5 and $5 million. "It's pure fantasy, pure baloney," Ritchie, a Democrat, says.