Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flashback - Bush's First 100 Days - Trillion Dolllar Tax Cuts and Repudiating Kyoto - 62% Approval!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 01:51 PM
Original message
Flashback - Bush's First 100 Days - Trillion Dolllar Tax Cuts and Repudiating Kyoto - 62% Approval!
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 01:52 PM by Median Democrat
Here is the irony. Dubya did not do much in his first 100 days. Worse, what he did do set the stage for the current crises that Obama is dealing with. The Bush tax cuts lead to an explosion in the current deficit. Also, Bush's backing out of Kyoto lead to an eight year effort to deny the effects of climate change. Yet, Bush has a 62% approval rating as the media gave him a relative free pass.

Compare that with Obama who not only has inherited a terible economy and two wars from Bush, but is dealing with behavior from Republicans that borders upon treason. Yet, I am sure the mainstream media will start running stories next month about how much more successful Bush was by virtue of his high approval ratings.

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/bush.100/


/snip

George W. Bush had to fight to become president. After he took office, thanks to lingering questions over the election and his predecessor's slow withdrawal from the spotlight, he had to fight to be considered presidential.

But at the 100-day mark of his tenure, that issue seems to be fading. Bush enjoys high job approval ratings -- higher than Bill Clinton at a similar juncture in his presidency -- and even the question of vision that plagued Bush's father does not appear to be an issue.

/snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Vision does not seem to be an issue???"
That was true concerning those who could see right thru the coke snotrinh, military deserting, fake cowboy, fake christian soon to become the worst president ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're are sloppy and no on calls them on their duplicitous questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ahh, the infamous tax cuts. That really helped the economy in the long run.
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 03:23 PM by Jennicut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bushies Country First my friggen ASS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LMAO. Okay, so if you move the rate up on wealthier Americans
by a tiny bit that will cause companies to lay off workers and therefore for us to stop buying things. Like that is not happening already. Guess what? The tax cuts are still there and we are losing jobs still. Duh. Go back to Freeperland where you can live with such lies as stupidity is welcome there. Oh, and the stock market got to 14k and is now crashing precisely because the wealthy were allowed to play with our hard earned money. Its not a Dem or Repub issue, its common sense. The stock market should NEVER be allowed to get up that high again. You like high growth and crashing lows? Not me, I prefer overall stability. But then Repubs only care about the free market and little else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. What does this mean?
you had me until "The stock market should NEVER be allowed to get up that high again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, speculators drove it up to unnatural highs at 14,000
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 04:11 PM by Jennicut
That means the crashes will be worse. I just think we need more regulations on the market in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Fair enough.
Given that I am 30, I hope (and think it would be reasonable) for the market to pass 14,000 in my lifetime (inflation alone should drive the prices up that much in 40 years).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. True. I am 33 , we know it will get higher in our lifetime but hopefully it will stay within
a good range, not too high or too low. I hope we learn from this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Helped Like A Ponzi Scheme You Mean - What About DOW During Clinton Years?
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 04:26 PM by Median Democrat
Bush's tax cuts, of course, fed the huge deficit we now have. Of course, you will say that the Republican President and Congress should have cut spending. However, if they had cut spending, then the economy would have stalled out. Also, Bush's appointee's failed to regulate financial institutions and actively encouraged the over heated housing market. So, deregulation coupled with lax regulators set up the current collapse in asset prices that is fueling the current depression.

In other words, we are now paying for the costs of Bush's war spending and tax cuts now.

In contrast, despite increasing taxes on upper income Americans during the Clinton era, the DOW soared during the 90s. In contrast, looking at the entire eight years of the Bush era, he had TWO separate recessions! Yup, tax cuts are the cure all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Funny, my white wine consumption began its upward trajectory then.
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 03:35 PM by Arugula Latte
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. You knew Bush was in over his head the second the whole Chinese plane incident happened.
When was that? I thought for sure at that point we were looking at a lame duck.

Then 9/11 happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Bush Set The Stage For The Current Trillion Dollar Deficits
And Republicans still have the chutzpah to attack Obama's economic plan when Republicans are loudly demanding that Obama simply implement the Bush 2001 tax plan?

Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC