Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chas Freeman releaseses statement on his withdrawal:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 06:59 PM
Original message
Chas Freeman releaseses statement on his withdrawal:

Looks like he had a courageous, independent voice and ideas. Too bad he won't be working for the Administration.

It's nice to see someone...anyone...speak up about this. Of course, we won't see a trace of it in the MSM.

*snip*

"I am not so immodest as to believe that this controversy was about me rather than issues of public policy. These issues had little to do with the NIC and were not at the heart of what I hoped to contribute to the quality of analysis available to President Obama and his administration. Still, I am saddened by what the controversy and the manner in which the public vitriol of those who devoted themselves to sustaining it have revealed about the state of our civil society. It is apparent that we Americans cannot any longer conduct a serious public discussion or exercise independent judgment about matters of great importance to our country as well as to our allies and friends."

"The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to prevent any view other than its own from being aired, still less to factor in American understanding of trends and events in the Middle East. The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth. The aim of this Lobby is control of the policy process through the exercise of a veto over the appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views, the substitution of political correctness for analysis, and the exclusion of any and all options for decision by Americans and our government other than those that it favors."

"There is a special irony in having been accused of improper regard for the opinions of foreign governments and societies by a group so clearly intent on enforcing adherence to the policies of a foreign government – in this case, the government of Israel. I believe that the inability of the American public to discuss, or the government to consider, any option for US policies in the Middle East opposed by the ruling faction in Israeli politics has allowed that faction to adopt and sustain policies that ultimately threaten the existence of the state of Israel. It is not permitted for anyone in the United States to say so. This is not just a tragedy for Israelis and their neighbors in the Middle East; it is doing widening damage to the national security of the United States."

*snip*

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0309/Freeman_blasts_Israel_lobby.html?showall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Repukes' weak, unpopular anti-american status hasn't stopped their tyranny
I am really sorry our leadership, particularly Reid, lets the Repukes run over them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Democrats didn't want this guy either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama could have stood up for him
he was a strong voice that will be missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Schumer takes credit
“Charles Freeman was the wrong guy for this position. His statements against Israel were way over the top and severely out of step with the administration. I repeatedly urged the White House to reject him, and I am glad they did the right thing.”
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/middle-east/schumer-takes-credit-for-getting-chas-freeman-ousted/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. Always count on Schumer to be wrong.\nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Freeman places blame squarely on the "Israel Lobby"
"The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to prevent any view other than its own from being aired, still less to factor in American understanding of trends and events in the Middle East. The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth. The aim of this Lobby is control of the policy process through the exercise of a veto over the appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views, the substitution of political correctness for analysis, and the exclusion of any and all options for decision by Americans and our government other than those that it favors."
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0309/Freeman_blasts_Israel_lobby.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Louis-Emmanuel Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Report: Offensive against Freeman led by man charged with espionage
Max Blumenthal says:

The assault on Charles “Chas” Freeman Jr., a former ambassador tapped to lead the National Intelligence Council, is the first blow in a battle over the Obama administration’s Middle East policy. Steven Rosen, a former director of the American Israel Political Affairs Committee due to stand trial this April for espionage for Israel, is the leader of the campaign against Freeman’s appointment. In his wake, a host of critics from the Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg to the New Republic’s Marty Peretz have emerged to assail Freeman’s comments on Israeli policies and demand that Obama rescind the diplomat’s appointment. The campaign against Freeman spread to Congress, where a handful of representatives including the top recipient of AIPAC donations, Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), called for an investigation of Freeman’s business ties to China and Saudi Arabia.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-03-10/obamarsquos-mideast-policy-smackdown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Here is more on Israeli espionage
snip - This is because Israel runs one of the most aggressive and damaging espionage networks targeting the U.S.. The fact of Israeli penetration into the country is not a subject oft-discussed in the media or in the circles of governance, due to the extreme sensitivity of the U.S.-Israel relationship coupled with the burden of the Israel lobby, which punishes legislators who dare to criticize the Jewish state. The void where the facts should sit is filled instead with the hallucinations of conspiracy theory -- the kind in which, for example, agents of the Mossad, Israel’s top intelligence agency, engineer the 9/11 attacks, while 4,000 Israelis in the Twin Towers somehow all get word to escape before the planes hit. The effect, as disturbing as it is ironic, is that the less the truth is addressed, the more noxious the falsity that spreads.

Israel's spying on the U.S., however, is a matter of public record, and neither conspiracy nor theory is needed to present the evidence. When the FBI produces its annual report to Congress concerning "Foreign Economic Collection and Industrial Espionage," Israel and its intelligence services often feature prominently as a threat second only to China. In 2005 the FBI noted, for example, that Israel maintains "an active program to gather proprietary information within the United States."

http://www.alternet.org/audits/130891/breaking_the_taboo_on_israel's_spying_efforts_on_the_united_states?page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Jeffrey Goldberg strikes again.
In case anyone forgets, this guy was one of the main drivers of public opinion for the Iraq War, using the New Yorker, no less, to sell the idea that Hussein had WMDs and was an imminent threat. http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2002/03/25/020325fa_FACT1

Most everything of importance in his article was later shown to be false. For whatever reason, though, the New Yorker kept him on staff for years afterward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. The pro-Israel hacks like Schumer and Leiberman won. Very unfortanate.
This guy had a fair and balanced view of Middle East and Tibet problems. The Pro-Israel lobby wins once again. And America loses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
27. So true - I hope Obama chooses someone else who'll rock that boat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. If you criticize Israel. You get the raft of both parties.
He didn't get the memo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Israel calls the shots in America, even in whitewashing investigations of Israel's actions
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 11:47 PM by IndianaGreen
Israel defenders claim that Israel doesn't run America, yet the facts appear to contradict their claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. It's aggravating that US foreign policy is not set by the US.
You'd think after almost 250 years we'd be able to make these decisions ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. No, rational people claim that Israel doesn't run America
Frothers and haters claim it does. It's one thing to grasp that the Israel lobby has far too much influence than is healthy, it's another to make the moronic claim that Israel runs the U.S
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. .
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. That has to end - and if Obama won't do it, who will??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lxlxlxl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. THIS IS RIDICULUOUS.
Thanks Schumer...and kudos to all the press people afraid to touch this issue at all. Can we talk about Limbaugh some more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JFKfanforever Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here's Juan Cole's blog on Freeman's situation....(great website!)
http://www.juancole.com/2009/03/chas-freeman-forced-by-israel-lobies-to.html

Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Chas Freeman forced by Israel Lobies to withdraw from NIC
Chairmanship 

Below is a note former MEPC president, Chas Freeman, sent to
friends and supporters. 

Begin Text:

To all who supported me or gave me words of encouragement
during the controversy of the past two weeks, you have my
gratitude and respect.

You will by now have seen the statement by Director of
National Intelligence Dennis Blair reporting that I have
withdrawn my previous acceptance of his invitation to chair
the National Intelligence Council. 

I have concluded that the barrage of libelous distortions of
my record would not cease upon my entry into office. The
effort to smear me and to destroy my credibility would instead
continue. I do not believe the National Intelligence Council
could function effectively while its chair was under constant
attack by unscrupulous people with a passionate attachment to
the views of a political faction in a foreign country. I
agreed to chair the NIC to strengthen it and protect it
against politicization, not to introduce it to efforts by a
special interest group to assert control over it through a
protracted political campaign.

As those who know me are well aware, I have greatly enjoyed
life since retiring from government. Nothing was further from
my mind than a return to public service. When Admiral Blair
asked me to chair the NIC I responded that I understood he was
“asking me to give my freedom of speech, my leisure, the
greater part of my income, subject myself to the mental
colonoscopy of a polygraph, and resume a daily commute to a
job with long working hours and a daily ration of political
abuse.” I added that I wondered “whether there wasn’t some
sort of downside to this offer.” I was mindful that no one is
indispensable; I am not an exception. It took weeks of
reflection for me to conclude that, given the unprecedentedly
challenging circumstances in which our country now finds
itself abroad and at home, I had no choice but accept the call
to return to public service. I thereupon resigned from all
positions that I had held and all activities in which I was
engaged. I now look forward to returning to private life,
freed of all previous obligations.

I am not so immodest as to believe that this controversy was
about me rather than issues of public policy. These issues had
little to do with the NIC and were not at the heart of what I
hoped to contribute to the quality of analysis available to
President Obama and his administration. Still, I am saddened
by what the controversy and the manner in which the public
vitriol of those who devoted themselves to sustaining it have
revealed about the state of our civil society. It is apparent
that we Americans cannot any longer conduct a serious public
discussion or exercise independent judgment about matters of
great importance to our country as well as to our allies and
friends. 

The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show
conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to
prevent any view other than its own from being aired, still
less to factor in American understanding of trends and events
in the Middle East. The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the
depths of dishonor and indecency and include character
assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion
of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter
disregard for the truth. The aim of this Lobby is control of
the policy process through the exercise of a veto over the
appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views, the
substitution of political correctness for analysis, and the
exclusion of any and all options for decision by Americans and
our government other than those that it favors. 

There is a special irony in having been accused of improper
regard for the opinions of foreign governments and societies
by a group so clearly intent on enforcing adherence to the
policies of a foreign government – in this case, the
government of Israel. I believe that the inability of the
American public to discuss, or the government to consider, any
option for US policies in the Middle East opposed by the
ruling faction in Israeli politics has allowed that faction to
adopt and sustain policies that ultimately threaten the
existence of the state of Israel. It is not permitted for
anyone in the United States to say so. This is not just a
tragedy for Israelis and their neighbors in the Middle East;
it is doing widening damage to the national security of the
United States. 

The outrageous agitation that followed the leak of my pending
appointment will be seen by many to raise serious questions
about whether the Obama administration will be able to make
its own decisions about the Middle East and related issues. I
regret that my willingness to serve the new administration has
ended by casting doubt on its ability to consider, let alone
decide what policies might best serve the interests of the
United States rather than those of a Lobby intent on enforcing
the will and interests of a foreign government. 

In the court of public opinion, unlike a court of law, one is
guilty until proven innocent. The speeches from which
quotations have been lifted from their context are available
for anyone interested in the truth to read. The injustice of
the accusations made against me has been obvious to those with
open minds. Those who have sought to impugn my character are
uninterested in any rebuttal that I or anyone else might make.


Still, for the record: I have never sought to be paid or
accepted payment from any foreign government, including Saudi
Arabia or China, for any service, nor have I ever spoken on
behalf of a foreign government, its interests, or its
policies. I have never lobbied any branch of our government
for any cause, foreign or domestic. I am my own man, no one
else’s, and with my return to private life, I will once again
– to my pleasure – serve no master other than myself. I will
continue to speak out as I choose on issues of concern to me
and other Americans.

I retain my respect and confidence in President Obama and DNI
Blair. Our country now faces terrible challenges abroad as
well as at home. Like all patriotic Americans, I continue to
pray that our president can successfully lead us in
surmounting them. 



Middle East Policy Council

1730 M Street, NW

Suite 512

Washington, DC 20036



End/ (Not Continued)




posted by Juan Cole @ 3/10/2009 07:51:00 PM 


2 Comments:
At 8:52 PM,  philadelphia collins said... 
Freeman chaired the MEPC, whose journal I would recommend to
all readers of Juan's blog. Truly, this man is a brilliant
thinker, and his withdrawal is a great loss to the country.
Both as Jew and as American, I am incredibly disappointed
though not at all surprised with AIPAC's efforts to tarnish
him.

  
At 9:04 PM,  Ginger2008 said... 
Had he hung in there and been confirmed, the smears would have
subsided. I'm really disappointed in him for caving.

 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kicking, b/c frankly it's shameful that
the only response I've gotten on this are new DUers. It's damn shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Every Man A King Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. Its because anyone who questions Israel is eventually banned. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. if you want to wade into an argument, try this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Heh.
I hear ya; no cogent arguments or opinions, just disdain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hmm.. Nixon, CHECK, Reagan, CHECK, Bush I, CHECK
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 11:56 PM by PBS Poll-435
A career made by the truly dangerous.



No thanks.





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_W._Freeman,_Jr.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. Schumer? Ugh, this party sickens me sometimes
Edited on Wed Mar-11-09 01:18 AM by LittleBlue
Someone with an alternative viewpoint is clearly not allowed.

I thought we were criticizing Bush for this kind of behavior?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byeya Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. For Shumer, Mukasey is just all right but Freeman is not.{end}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
20. Same shit- different day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
21. Disappointing. I have no position on the man himself, but it makes clear that some things do not
change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Every Man A King Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. The whole country is brainwashed about Israel
I sure hope Iran gets nukes soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Why? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Every Man A King Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Why does Israel need them? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Do you always answer a question
with a question? You said you couldn't wait for Iran to have nukes - I want to know why. If you don't have an answer, simply don't answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Every Man A King Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Because hopefully it will deter Israeli aggression n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. For the record
I don't think anybody should have nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. Idiotic flamebait post #x
Please. Go away. When you post something like this you make all reasonable critics of Israeli foreign policy look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
24. He should have stayed and slugged it out
With the attitude he evinces in his withdrawal it is obvious he had the drive needed to stay in this thing for the long haul, do the right thing, and get confirmed.
We may be hearing more about this in the coming days, something that makes his withdrawal more palatable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
26. Digusting kick and rec. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC