Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Citi doesn't need more government capital: Parsons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:26 PM
Original message
Citi doesn't need more government capital: Parsons
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Citigroup Inc Chairman Richard Parsons said on Thursday that the bank does not need any more capital injections from the government and expressed confidence that Citi would remain in private hands.

Asked in an interview with Reuters whether Citigroup needed additional government capital injections, Parsons said: "No, I think actually, particularly with the latest conversion... Citi is actually one of the better capitalized banks in the world."

Parsons was speaking on the sidelines of a Business Roundtable event where President Barack Obama addressed business executives.

The Citigroup leader also brushed aside any prospect of the U.S. government nationalizing the bank.

"I don't think the administration is heading in that direction," Parsons said. "But I have a lot of confidence in the future viability and strength of a privately held Citi."

The Obama administration and regulators including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke have said they do not want the government to take full control of the nation's banks.

Citi's shares on Thursday closed 13 cents higher, or 8.4 percent, to $1.67 on the New York Stock Exchange. For the first time, Citi shares fell below $1 on March 5.

The U.S. government said last month it would boost its equity stake in Citigroup to as much as 36 percent through the conversion of up to $25 billion in preferred shares to common stock.

In total, Citi has received $45 billion of taxpayer-funded capital since October. This marked the third attempt by the U.S. authorities to prop up Citigroup in the past five months.

more http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE52B7SD20090312?sp=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's interesting how they suddenly don't need any more money
after that pesky "nationalization" word started cropping up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Talk of nationalization and suddenly the crisis is over and we're profitable!
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chiti needs to be broken up, along with BOA, and sold off piece by piece.........
to smaller regional financial institutions. BIG BANKS should not be allowed to exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. How much of them do we already own?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. 36%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. good thing they dont need any govt money...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC