Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tim Geithner has a LOT on his plate, and very little help at this point

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:44 PM
Original message
Tim Geithner has a LOT on his plate, and very little help at this point
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/19/business/economy/19geithner.html?hp

snip:

"Since before his confirmation in late January, Mr. Geithner has juggled a crushing workload: overhauling the Bush administration’s discredited financial bailout program; helping with Mr. Obama’s nearly $800 billion economic stimulus plan; and managing the government effort to salvage the auto industry.

Mr. Geithner is now fashioning a new federal regulatory structure for the financial industry to replace the one that failed. He has developed a housing program that aims to avert up to nine million more foreclosures, and programs for getting credit flowing to small businesses and consumers as well as the major financial giants.

At 47, the same age as the president, Mr. Geithner works out at 5:30 a.m., gets to his desk by 6:30 and leaves 15 hours later.

On Tuesday last week, as he prepared for a meeting in London of the finance ministers of the Group of 20 nations, Mr. Geithner learned that A.I.G. by Sunday would send out the bonuses to employees at its financial products unit, which developed the risky derivatives now blamed for the global credit crisis.

With few senior political appointees on hand, the word came from one of the numerous career civil servants who keep the Treasury functioning through changes of administration, according to an official.

Mr. Geithner consulted lawyers. They told him the government could not override the contracts that the insurance conglomerate had signed in early 2008, when its financial products unit already was fast losing money.

On Wednesday evening, Mr. Geithner called A.I.G.’s government-appointed chief executive, Edward M. Liddy, and demanded that he renegotiate payments. The next morning, Mr. Geithner informed White House advisers. Later that day a senior adviser, David Axelrod, informed the president.

On Friday, Mr. Liddy said he could not block the bonuses; he did agree to reduce future executive bonuses set for July 15 and Sept. 15. With Mr. Geithner in London, Treasury officials tried to manage the potential criticism by leaking word to selected news media on Saturday. On Sunday, the economic advisers went on TV."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've been saying, I will not judge him until
he gets his full team in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agree...and this isn't run of the mill stuff they're dealing with either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wackywaggin Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Agreed!!

I think that some are jumping to judgment too quickly!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. That sounds fair...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. We need more of these reality checks; GOP slammed more for its deregulatory, don'r meddle actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. thank you NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. What is holding Geithner from getting help? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. the vetting process.
Romer countered that a “huge professional career staff” is in place. Gregory then asked who in the Treasury Department beside Secretary Timothy Geithner is communicating with the banks. Romer answered that the Treasury Secretary is working to get people in place, and that the Obama administration is doing business in a different way. Strict rules and vetting requirements have tied their hands on some of the kinds of people they can hire, she said.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/03/15/business/econwatch/entry4866763.shtml


The President never said change would be easy .... or even quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Finding people who cannot be pilloried by the press, GOP and lefty blogs
as being too close to the financial system. Everyone is waiting to play the gotcha game. See the reaction when he hired Lewis Alexander from Citibank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Nina Totenberg said on "Inside Washington" on Friday
that the Senate Banking Committee is being very, very careful.

As well they should. They're probably still embarrassed about Geithner's tax problems, and three assistant secretary nominees have bowed out before the confirmation process for reasons unclear.

There have been quite a few defections from the Milton Friedman camp recently. Those folks would not be at home in the Obama economic team.

Then, there are probably a lot of people that Geithner knows on Wall Street, and few of them would want to run the gamut to confirmation considering what they or their close colleagues have done.

Then again, who wants to fail and success here is an iffy proposition, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not that we should feel too sorry for him
after all he knew it would be a tough job.

But think about it, If you were Treasury Secretary, and you were preparing for the G20 meeting in the midst of a global financial crisis, how much time would you spend chasing down bonuses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Those bonuses are a huge political problem and a moral hazard.
No one is talking about the G-20 when scumbags got huge bonuses. It's a republican talking point, sure, but it's a great one. Everyone understands this. What percentage of voters do you think even know about the G-20.

Geithner is no politician, and he should have one shadowing him all day because this is the hot topic and it's not going away. Geithner should have called Obama immediately when he found out about these bonuses. Instead, Axelrod told Obama a day later, and Obama has been behind the curve on this one ever since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. No wait, we can't have reasoned discussion here. It's better just to go with the histrionic
"Geithner sucks!!!111!!!111!!!!" thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. For me it's not the bonuses
The bonuses are petty cash. A lightning rod for sure, but very small overall in the scheme of things. Now funneling $13 billion to Goldman Sachs, and billions more to the other banks, through AIG is a major item. Right away, when he saw that, red flags should have gone up. Immediately it should have occurred to him that that kind of payoff to one of the chief architects of the current problem using taxpayer funds was unconscionable. The fact that it didn't bother him, and that he did nothing about it, and kept it secret, disqualifies him from serving. He is incapable of representing the public interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. Kick and rec. I can't believe some of the histrionics coming from DU
about Geithner when we know the shitpile left on his desk and the fact that he is working without a full team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. So whose fault is it that Geithner doesn't have help yet?
I can't believe that if this was made the number one priority in the entire Government that we couldn't find 18 people in the United States clean enough to do these jobs.

Does anyone believe the understaffing of the Treasury is of no consequence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
17. yeah, it's "hard work" shoveling the Banksters losses onto the backs of workers
Every time he shovels out one pile of shit he finds another even bigger behind it! The poor man must feel like Sisyphus! Good thing the workers are used to heavy loads! After all, the Masters of the Universe couldn't be expected to carry that weight - not in their expensive suits and all! What a thought!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC