Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Franken Wants Coleman To Pay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 09:26 AM
Original message
Franken Wants Coleman To Pay
Edited on Thu Mar-19-09 09:32 AM by JimGinPA
Democrat Al Franken wants the judges who heard the U.S. Senate trial to force Norm Coleman to pay court costs and some opposing lawyers' fees -- a potentially expensive bill -- if the Republican loses his bid to overturn the results of the recount.

Franken sought such payments in a document filed Tuesday summarizing his case. In it, he also asks the judges to consider evidence involving 430 absentee ballots that he had identified as wrongly rejected, and is asking specifically that 252 of them be counted.

Coleman also filed his summary of his case Tuesday, reiterating in detail his argument that wrongly rejected absentee ballots, missing and twice-counted ballots cost him the election. Recount results certified in early January showed Franken on top by 225 votes.

Franken's document asks that Coleman pay the costs of the seven-week trial. And in seeking attorneys' fees for Franken lawyers, it refers to sanctions that the judges earlier imposed on Coleman for failing to follow court rules on disclosing information about a witness, Minneapolis election judge Pamela Howell.

~snip~



http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/41394162.html?page=1&c=y


I can't wait for him to be sworn in. Rush's & Billo's heads will explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. It will be soon.
Within two weeks, I would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep, I expect the MNSC to compel Pawlenty to issue the certification
even if Coleman appeals to federal courts. Nothing about the statute allwoing for it to be settled in court can suggest that includes appeals to federal authorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. And, so do I!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC