Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How would you characterize your opinion of the Obama Administration so far:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:33 AM
Original message
Poll question: How would you characterize your opinion of the Obama Administration so far:
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 11:33 AM by leftofthedial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have to go with "Bait and Switch" as my dominant opinion so far.
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 12:35 PM by leftofthedial
He cleverly left many of his plans ambiguous enough during the campaign, which when coupled with his often aggressively liberal and populist rhetoric, allowed him to draw heavily from the support of liberal voters. On the major issues of "war," the economy, health care and civil liberties, he has done virtually nothing as President to justify this support. I think as a result, unless he has a turnaround or events unfold dramatically, he will face a tough go in 2012, not because liberals will vote for a repuke, but because the won't vote at all.

One HUGE caveat: his proposed policy in Afghanistan could very well destroy what's left of this country. This has quagmire written all over it--a quagmire that would make Iraq look like a brief splash in the mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. He was talking about Afghanistan during the campaign
This is not new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. "new" has nothing to do with it.
His policy in Afghanistan is stupid on a level that far exceeds the stupidity of the bush cabal's policy in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. So how is it bait and switch if it's not new to Obama's platform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. The Afghanistan comment was a caveat, not part of the "bait and switch" comment.
If Obama's Afghanistan adventure turns out half as bad as previous attempts to bring change or order or even stability to the region, my response will become "disaster."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
106. You might want to read today's NYT (OpEd) that basically argues that
the "graveyard of empires" analogy is not accurate applied to what Obama wants to do in Afghanistan. Here's the link: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/28/opinion/28bergen.html?_r=1

Polling of the Afghan people themselves show that they fear the Taliban MUCH more than the U.S.

Let me know what you think after reading this thoughtful piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Every Man A King Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. need some examples
or are you just talking out of your ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Disastrous Afghanistan occupation and nation-building examples:
Genghis Khan
Alexander the Great
Various Indian empires
Various Persian empires
Various central Asian empires
The British Empire
The Soviet Union

...every one of them resulting in protracted bloodbaths that failed to change the region.

I am talking out my ass, but I'm whispering. You might want to lean a little closer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. Are you seriously using Afghanistan as your example of a "bait and switch?"
I mean he was clear as day about his intentions there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. No. I said overall I felt like a victim of bait and switch.
His policy on Afghanistan (which is more militant and less well-defined than I expected) could change my attitude to "disaster" as it unfolds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. I thought there should be only special forces there to begin with
I just hope he doesn't get mired down there - no one ever controls it. And it's not a typical conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. NAFTA.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. 'done virtually nothing on the economy'
There is no sense trying to please purist children.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #47
87. your quote is (surprise!) inaccurate.
I said he has done nothing on the economy to justify the support liberals gave him in the election.

Instead, he has directed about 80% of his economic remedies so far to supply-side bank bailouts or tax cuts (to mollify congressional repukes).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amyrose2712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I never thought he was "the most liberal" senator.
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 11:48 AM by amyrose2712
I am mixed. But, I expected to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He was always a Clintonian, right-of-center, pro-corporate "free marketeer."
I never thought of him as remotely liberal, and I'm not surprised by his choices so far, except those related to Iraq and Afghanistan. I did think he was smart enough to recognize that without the active support of liberals he never would have been elected. I also did not think he would so blatantly abandon that constituency once elected. Now I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. So, you knew he wasn't liberal, but you're claiming bait-and-switch anyway?
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 12:47 PM by TwilightZone
The problem there isn't Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. As I explained above, he knowingly shifted his post-primary campaign rhetoric
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 12:56 PM by leftofthedial
to appeal to liberals. He knew that he needed to energize the liberals, without whom he could not have won.

Immediately upon election though, he began naming conservatives to most posts, especially economic posts. His economic policies, "national security" (authoritarian) policies, and military policies so far are fundamentally continuations of bush policies, with little more than superficial tweaks.

His post-election actions in no way match his campaign rhetoric, thus the "bait and switch" choice.

After a generation of "Democratic" politicians' lies, I should have known better than to trust his word or his intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
53. Yeah, yeah Obama=Bush. You Nader humpers really never learn. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. You have trouble staying on subject, don't you?
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 05:48 PM by leftofthedial
Have you tried Ritalin?

If you'd been a DUer a little longer, you'd know that I was one of DU's most rabid *critics* of Nader, you strawman and ad hominem humper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #55
70. Well, you've become Nader now.
His economic policies, "national security" (authoritarian) policies, and military policies so far are fundamentally continuations of bush policies, with little more than superficial tweaks.


Anyone who calls his stimulus bill and his budget "continuations of bush policies' is fundamentally unqualified to discuss policy.

You just like to complain, and will lie to in order to justify it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. actual stimulus amounts to about 15% or 20% of his economic policy so far
The rest has been supply-side giveaways to banks or tax cuts that won't stimulate anything except another round of gas price hikes from big oil.

One of us here has lied, and it ain't me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. His budget proposal is an extension of Bush?
Let me guess--you don't know what's in it?

So, are you ignorant or a liar?

And, an $800 Billion spending bill is 15% of his economic policy?

LMAO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #76
82. payroll tax cuts to working people will be spent
you are equating these with tax cuts for the rich?

now i'm questioning everything else you are saying because the above is certainly not true.

well you had your chance to convince me, no when i read your posts i'll have to say to myself, "that's interesting, but he was so blindingly wrong, he was either lying or uninformed on the tax cut issue, so how can i trust him on what he's writing about now?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #82
88. they'll be spent alright, probably on higher gas prices that big oil is already rolling out.
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 06:44 PM by leftofthedial
a $50 tax cut will disappear into oblivion when one is unemployed or losing their home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. now you are arguing something different about the taxes
you gonna stick with one idea and see it through or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #82
92. Seven dollars on your
paycheck, is not my idea of a stimulus.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. I am glad that you posted this poll.
It shows that most DUers support Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. As I type this, 72 people have voted.
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 12:58 PM by dflprincess
This is an unscientific poll there's no way that number can be projected as "most" DUers.


Oh, and I select "What's New?--he represents a continuation of the same pro-corporate policies we've had for at least 30 years now".

I voted for Obama, but I didn't fall for hype and didn't actually expect much change from him and, in that respect, I haven't been disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. OK , so far most DUers
support Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Ahem. Most DUers avoid the GD-P forum like the plague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Then why post the poll here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Did you not read my previous reply to you?
I posted it here and during the day precisely because this is the prime time for and the main concentration of Obama supporters on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I suspect that you would find
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 01:32 PM by countingbluecars
that most DUers support Obama-any time-any forum. Most Americans do according to recent polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. as I write this post,
here in the heart of Obama love country, the (unscientific) poll stands at 62 love, 35 have mixed feelings or don't love.

Wouldn't you have expected more than 64% of those in a forum that by rights ought to love Obama more than pretty much anyplace, would express clear approval?

Aren't you a little surprised that 36% of those in that forum have reservations ranging from "disagree with some of his policies" to "disaster"?

Personally, I expected about 85% unqualified worship here.

I don't think this is a good sign for Obama. Perhaps he should reconsider the debt he owes the liberals who gave him victory in November. So far, he's been pretty fucking harsh (although less harsh than the centrists here) in his treatment of liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. No. Of course we disagree with some of his policies. He's not for equal marriage rights for one.
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 01:44 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
But I don't hate Obama and I'm glad he's the president.

Edited to add: I voted Kucinich in the primary. But Kucinich didn't win. These were the options given. The seemingly innocuous 'there's no difference between Dems and Republicans" gave us 8 years of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Is it wrong to criticize the policies with which you disagree?
(as some here would have it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. There's a difference between "I disagree with Obama's policies on XYZ" & "Obama should rot in hell"
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 01:46 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
Which I have actually seen here on DU.

The latter ends up making people firmer in their belief they must defend Obama, which makes critics firmer in their belief they must criticize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I'm not a "rot in hell" kind of guy
maybe for Larry Summers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
94. I would really like to see the thread where someone said Obama can
rot in hell.

Link please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #94
109. I sent it in a PM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
95. I for one am tired
of all the bullying going on in this forum. These people need to be called out!! People being slammed, simply because they don't agree with all of Obama's policies. It's ridiculous, this is a discussion forum, not a one sided, fucking, fan club!

The people that persist in this behavior, will ensure that we all go down to defeat!

Thanks for the intelligent posts, it's just too bad people are attacking you, instead of debating the content! You must have a lot of patience............

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. I am not surprised
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 02:16 PM by countingbluecars
that there is a range of support for Obama (other than your last two choices). But I am happy to see that most, at this count, support the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. 287 people have voted in my poll on GD, with 74% approving and 13% somewhat approving
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Thanks! unscientific polls still show that the design of the poll can affect results.
"Approve" is a pretty imprecise category of attitude.

I was looking for the quality of approval or disapproval.

Frankly, I'm surprised that my poll did not register more extreme approval responses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
75. Well, your fellow haters probably wanted to give you the result
you wanted.

Maybe they even posted a link at Free Republic for you. After all, you and the Freepers both want him to fail.


Of course, even they aren't so stupid as to think Obama=Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #32
85. i read the choices and decided i didn't like the poll
i'm sure others reacted similarly.

i think approve/disapprove is the one comparable to the poll they use nationally.

if you wanted to make it more interesting, i might have voted for "Excellent, but there is still a lot more to do"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
51. Oh, yes, you're sooo CONCERNED.
Concern trolling is so 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. Run home now and tell your big sister that you called the mean old leftofthedial names.
Maybe she'll let you wear her panties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #56
73. Ooh, a misogynist insult from the Naderite purist.
How impure of you.

Any how, your hatred of all things Obama is abundant. Perhaps you should join hands with Michelle Bachman, your ideological mirror image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
84. i haven't voted and i don't know if i will
the wording of the questions made me think it was weighted against him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
93. I think it's a very interesting
poll. I too, was adding up that 36% which illustrates some division. It's not surprising though, considering the dem party was split down the middle during the primary.

It would be interesting to see this poll in 6-12 months.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I'm glad I posted it too, although it shows no such thing.
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 01:01 PM by leftofthedial
I intentionally posted it during the day when most of the most rabid Obama suppporters seem to post and in the forum where most of the most rabid Obama supporters post.

So far, it's about 36% who do not unconditionally support Obama. The rest do. I think that's probably a pretty accurate demographic measure of the daytime GD-P forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. So those who said, "So far so good, but..." they are all unconditional Obama supporters?
What planet are you on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. perhaps "unconditional" is too strong for that response.
how about just "supporters"?

In which case, the results are even less pro-Obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
52. Yeah, only 63% say so far so good.
Just awful, considering the number of purity trolls such as yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. 63% is roughly his approval rating among the entire nation.
Wouldn't you expect better on the most Obama-friendly forum at DU?

Calling me names does not make Obama's growing problem with the liberals in his own party go away.

If you really support him, you might try to find common ground with lefties like me instead of ascribing attitudes to me that I don't have and calling me silly names. Don't you think? I posted what I think is a fair poll here, with plenty of opportunity for his supporters to express their views. I have not attacked anyone; I've only defended my point of view, which is that Obama as President has been much further right on the economy, Iraq, Afghanistan, health care and civil liberties than he was as Obama the Democratic candidate. that does not make me a purity troll. Calling me that makes you look silly, inarticulate and afraid of discussing actual issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #54
67. You're the one who said Obama=Bush.
So, contempt is the only appropriate response.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #67
74. I never said any such thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. Liar, liar, pants on fire:
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 06:24 PM by geek tragedy
His economic policies, "national security" (authoritarian) policies, and military policies so far are fundamentally continuations of bush policies, with little more than superficial tweaks.


I'm guessing you were too lazy and/or apathetic to review his budget proposal, or to review what items actually made it into his stimulus plan.

Because only a staggeringly ignornant fool would claim that his stimulus and budget--you know, the economic stuff--was a continuation of Bush's policies.

And, of course, I must have missed Bush's attempts to reform health care and to take action on global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. poor thing. You can't read. Now I understand.
I'm sorry I argued with you. I hope I didn't hurt your widdle feelings.

Nothing there says Obama = Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. You said his policies are the same as Bush's.
So, which is it: were you willfully lying or just making shit up without bothering to educate yourself?

Also, did Bush come up with a plan to help homeowners stay in their houses?

Did he expand health care coverage for children?

Sorry, but you are simply delusional, ignorant, or a liar.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #79
97. Good god, I can't believe
your patience.........your humor works well, and not taking the bait works better...........LOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #34
86. it shows your poll is nowhere near as good as you think it is
which should give you perspective when you jump all over someone like Obama.

i mean, what have you done? you are posting on a discussion board, and you criticize Obama? he's spent more time on the economy in the past two months than you've spent working at your job for crying out loud.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
38. heh heh. you calling anyone rabid is too funny, dear.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #38
57. thanks. I'll be here all week.
cleaning the spittle off the front of the stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
83. it also shows the OP does not
quite clearly actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. I am part of the 29% base. I'm not going anywhere. EVER!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why is this a choice: "He and his policies spell disaster for the country. "
A disaster for the country?

You were expecting freepers to vote?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. we do get lurking trolls
and choices like that often keep them from doing any harm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. 'threw liberals under the bus' is a PUMA troll talking point.
But, you yourself agree with that one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. you realize there are actual issues underneath all the labels you've been memorizing,
don't you?

so which am I? Naderite? 2005-er? PUMA (whatever the hell that even is)? Purity troll?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #58
68. General heading of "chronic malcontents."
People who only care if it allows them to bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. Excellent, better than my expectations, and getting better by the week. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
59. In some areas, I've been pleasantly surprised.
He has been more than willing to condemn the idiot right--Limbaugh, the obstructionists, the former bush cabalists.

I think he's moving in the wrong direction on some fronts though.

Overall, I like the guy and rejoice visibly when he appears on TV. Not hearing king george is blessing worth more than I could have imagined, and I imagined a lot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #59
100. One of the fast talking afternoon news people on MSNBC Friday
mistakenly said something about President Bush instead of President Obama and I felt a short sense of dread.....



mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
37. waiting with bated breath for more people to join you in your crusade
to take down Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. Apparently Obama's budget and stimulus proposals were 'nothing'
to the perpetually poutraged purists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
60. What crusade? I posted a poll with a balance of possible responses.
Did you vote, or are you just out and about pissing on trees again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
39. So far, so good
I like that he's done more in his first 100 days than most Presidents do. I didn't vote excellent yet, because I still want to see how much he changes the status quo. Right now, I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt on many things - that he's trying a shrewd approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #39
61. He has been productive. No one can say that he isn't working hard.
He has SO many issues that need attention. He's been doing a remarkable job of addressing most of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudaFuda Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
41. 1/24th of the way thru first term is too soon to say. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
42. "I agree with some of his policies, but disagree with others. "
Gay marriage, health care, and the war on drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
43. Excellent
I'm proud of the fact that he is "doing too much" (of the right things)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
empyreanisles Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
44. I love Obama. Then again, I am center-left, just like he is.
Obama might even be more leftie than you think. Are you actually ready to throw in the towel after 60-70 days? He's had some big tests so far, and maybe he didn't come out exactly on your side.

Plenty more to come in 4 years. Why not do a report card then?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #44
62. I'm not throwing in the towel by any means.
He can still reverse course on his disastrous supply-side economic bailout, if he does it while a couple of repukes and the conservadems will still vote with him. It may be too late to inject more actual stimulus into the demand side though. I don't see him getting 60 votes in the Senate again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
empyreanisles Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #62
91. It think its supply side cause we are in an emergency and they hold the power.
In the short term. I truly believe he is looking for a demand-side rebirth by creating confidence in the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #91
104. Do you think the Conservadems and a few Senate repukes will vote with him again,
say on his budget, much less if he comes back for more demand-side stimulus?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
45. Obama is the perfect CEO for America!
I'd go with "continuation of the same pro-corporate policies" only because NO ONE could get even close to being elected in AmericaFuckYeah! unless s/he promised to continue those policies.

People can recognize the truth about our Fascist-y govt and WaterCarrier politicians without being haters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. But they can't do it without being hated apparently.
Business pretty much as usual, under gawd, indivisible, with as much liberty and justice as you can afford. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
46. His approval rating here is lower than in the country.
Of course, it's the Nader humpers who dislike him here . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #46
64. "Nader humper." That's SO 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #64
69. So is Naderism. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
50. Obama means well, and he's done some good things, BUT...
...why in the name of sweet Susan Sarandon is KBR still being allowed to build and troubleshoot bath and shower fixtures for troops in Iraq that have a nasty habit of electrocuting them?

Since Obama still has all of Bush's recently-assumed executive powers and hasn't relinquished any of them back to Congress or to the people themselves, you'd think he'd take on KBR within the first two weeks. Instead, I'm hearing crickets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
65. Change we can market you into believing in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #65
99. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #99
103. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
66. Yikes!
Current poll results, with 192 votes in,

Love Obama--61%
Mixed feelings to hate him--39%


Wouldn't you have expected more love?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. Well, there are lots of Naderite morons who think he's like Bush.
This site has its share of concern trolls, purity trolls, and flat-out extremist whiners.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
namahage Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. I suspect that that many of the people who voted "mixed feelings"
actually love Obama, despite disagreeing with some of his positions. You might want to revise your percentages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #66
80. Well, you're in the extreme 15% of Obama haters here.
To put the numbers another way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #66
102. Why are there two options for mixed feelings?
You lumped people who may be highly supportive of Obama with those who aren't supportive. Even those who believe he's doing an excellent job may not agree with all of his policies. You used a pretty broad brush with that first mixed feelings option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
89. 7 and 9. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
96. He's got a lot on his plate and a lot to do. However, so far he's doing it excellent. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
98. Thanks for all your responses.
I'm in the midst of recording and had to bail out of DU to record some guitar parts and background vocals.

For those of you who are interested, in a standard approval poll, I'd vote "approve" for Obama. It doesn't mean I like everything he is doing, but there you have it. I don't hate him. I'm not a "troll" of any variety. I'm not a McCain supporter. I'm not a Nader supporter. I was just curious about the depth of passion DU/GD-P'ers feel about him so far.

I really wish some of you would come up with a new schtick though. Your silly insults aren't even well thought out.

Buenos noches mi amigos y amigas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
101. ,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
105. He's done allot IMHO to stabilize the economy
and this week judging by the housing market numbers and other indicators I would say his plans are working. If he keeps this up next year this time we'll be experiencing an economic boom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
107. It is abundantly clear that on the major issue facing the US and the world
namely the economy, he is a bought and paid for wall street tool. He lied during his campaign when he repeatedly stated that he was not beholden to special interests. He is beholden to the most insidious of special interests, the thieves that live on Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
108. Fascinating
What's New?--he represents a continuation of the same pro-corporate policies we've had for at least 30 years now. (22 votes, 8%) Vote
He and his policies spell disaster for the country. (5 votes, 2%) Vote
Never liked him and still don't. (7 votes, 3%) Vote


Freepers galore. The first category surely could simply be extreme left, but the last two are definitely freepers who didn't vote for Obama. If they did they are either liars or the biggest hypocrites on the planet.

Still, good to see more than 80% of DU willing to give Obama a chance, with 60% giving him high marks.

He is already the greatest President ever. (5 votes, 2%) Vote
Excellent! (56 votes, 21%) Vote
So far, so good, but there is still much to do. (100 votes, 37%) Vote
Mixed feelings--I agree with some of his policies, but disagree with others. (61 votes, 23%) Vote





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #108
110. Despite all the ridiculous rhetoric and attacks on me for posting it,
I think it's a pretty interesting poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
111. He's doing EXACTLY what he said he would.
And that is both good and bad.

I certainly disagree with him on several issues, but I gave him a so far so good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC