Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which Godless Communist Latte Drinking PUMA Homo Made This Quote:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:14 AM
Original message
Which Godless Communist Latte Drinking PUMA Homo Made This Quote:
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jefferson. And there are no communist PUMAs. Take it back.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, not Jefferson:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Not really "false" - just "unverified" which I didn't know.
But I'm fine with attributed to Jefferson, since it is attributed to him in congressional record, even if years later.

so "attributed to" rather than "said."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. No, 'false' - the word 'deflation' is a century out of place
No-one would have understood it if Jefferson had said it. Hell, 'inflation' probably wouldn't have been understood - 30 years before anyone wrote it down with the financial meaning.

The quote is demonstrably false. "Attributed to" as in "someone lied about who said it". You've just been lied to by another politician, that's all. Being in the congressional record doesn't make something true. That's a good lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm not sure I believe that, but I'm also not trying to defend its origin either.
If its false, its false - my mistake.

I'm not sure I'm convinced its "certain" but I certainly won't tag it to Jefferson in the future. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Heh - so a 20th century politician made it up, and then lied about who said it
Seems par for the course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. That's not exactly what I got from reading....
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
27inCali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
53. sounds like Wilson
or maybe Roosevelt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. You know, I wouldn't feel so bad if this was the first time I've been corrected about that.
Probably by you. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. LOL I've had that quote for years and never knew it was of suspect origin!
Learn something every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
40. Did you get it from someone online?
I guess the lesson is "trust but verify.":patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. No, but honestly I don't frequently look up every attributed quote I come across.
Probably a vulnerability, but I suspect you don't either.

Hell I've never bothered to verify half the quotes I read as Martin Luther King Jr's are actually his. My interest in verification is proportional to how serious it is if I'm wrong.

In this case, not serious at all so.... there you go. :)

If I was writing a master's thesis... then I'd be sourcing any and everything that happened to have quotation marks around it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. I understand...
I have encountered the quote on the net before and in at least a few cases, it was associated with the postings of Ron Paul, anti-Fed types.

I wonder how it ever got started?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Sorry, I've never corrected anyone about it before. But it has shown up so many times over the past
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 05:39 AM by Hissyspit
couple of weeks! Don't mean to be a "Quote Nazi." :D

Jefferson wrote many quite similar things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I'm glad you did - I didn't realize it was unverified (or proven false whatever)
I'm not an expert about how to judge authenticity by the anachronisticity (yeah I made that up) of certain words, and I find myself highly skeptical...

But that's totally an aside. I won't be connecting that with Jefferson anymore either way.

Still, the actual quote of Jefferson's that Snopes gives right below that is as brutal of not more so than the one I put up there heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Yes, I tried to cut and paste it, but it seems Snopes won't let you.
Or at least me on my Mac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
48. Thanks for the link.
These sorts of false quotes and urban legends are a fascinating study on their own.

I have encountered it in posts by anti-Fed, Ron Paul types.

Figures that it originated in relatively modern times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Jefferson (attribution)- back in the day when the debate was gold or silver
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 05:35 AM by denem
to back the currency. Metalism was ditched for sound reasons in the Great Depression. Credit is necessary for growth. In fact, money is, in essence, debt - a promise to pay, even when backed by gold. Regulation is essential to control banking. That was diluted by legislation in 1999, 2000, and in practice by the Bushies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. "Metalism" wasn't ditched in the great depression - it was around until 1971.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. 1933: The right of the public to redeem paper in gold was abandoned.
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 05:41 AM by denem
In 1971, a system of fixed exchange rates theoretically based on gold, bit the dust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. It wasn't theoretically based on gold. It was based on gold, until Nixon decoupled it.
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 05:42 AM by Political Heretic
Everyone based their currency on the dollar, and in turn the dollar was tied to a fixed gold price.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. The dollar could not be redeemed at the fixed price = theoretical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. Establishes global currency value = not theoretical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. No - the fixed exchange rates could be periodically varied.
The gold standard meant gold exchanged, including internationally, as an alternative to paper. One irredeemable rate without metal exchange did not establish value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Sigh... I feel like you are splitting hairs.
Some refer to the roughly 1940-1970 period has a system "similar to the gold standard." Some just refer to it as the post-war gold standard, or post-war international gold standard.

So potatoe, potato - whatever.

Our money system was in some way connected to gold, though not perhaps technically a "gold standard" by some definitions up until 1971 - how's that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milspec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. Thanks denem and Heretic
That was interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. Shouldn't "Metalism" mean "government of, by, and for Spinal Tap"?
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 05:50 AM by Ken Burch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Headline: Heavy dollar sinking like a stone(d).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Do you feel like a big man using the term "Homo" in a derogatory way?
If you do, this Homosexual would like to meet you face to face and discuss it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. He was imitating right-wing rhetoric. He wasn't using that as a genuine slur
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 05:29 AM by Ken Burch
The entire phrase was Republican word salad.

It was probably also an allusion to Sean Penn's Academy Awards acceptance speech for "MILK".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's been a long night for me.
I think it's time for bed. Thanks for setting me curvy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. Rest well, my friend. It's good to be wary, but sometimes you CAN trust...
...don't worry, we've got your "six".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Nod, on both counts. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Except 'PUMA' is an insult only in left wing circles
such as DU. So your list made me raise an eyebrow too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. My list was broadly targeted at a wide range of assholes :)
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 05:44 AM by Political Heretic
I'm generous like that - mostly I just strung together a long list of insults typically used by people who can't be bothered to rationally engage... left or right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. An insult in left wing circles, but also used in right-wing circles in '08
As a taunt and as a means to attempt to create(unsuccessfully, as it turned out)a gender-based wedge in the Democratic camp. The notion was that the "PUMA" movement(a movement that only really ever existed in the GOP "war rooms" and the fantasies of Faux News)could be used, along with the decision to put a woman on the GOP ticket(can't remember her name...wore glasses...looked like a "naughty librarian" porn character(or so I'm told)...did bad things to moose...you know the one)
would lead to a "miraculous" come-from-behind McCain landslide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Buy a clue.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I have bought several
But the way DU has been lately, it's been hard to tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
30. True enough, it does get weird here sometimes.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. Relax, he understands now...it's all good.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
34. Not a Jefferson quote
But he did have many unkind things to say about banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Aye, I think we coverd that hehe
I stand corrected, though... I'm not sure how much I trust the confidence with which some assert it is without a doubt false.

That said, I wouldn't deliberately make it sound like it was confirmed to be someone's quote when it was at best uncertain and at worst conclusively not, so I'm glad to be corrected. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Here's a good source for many of his quotes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Oh wow thanks
That could keep my occupied for a long time :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
39. Ya know, "attributing" quotes to "Founding Fathers" is as American
as apple pie.

It's also one of the most insidious forms of propaganda.

David Barton adopted the technique to try and prove there's no such thing as separation of church and state and the founding fathers really intended a Christian Theocracy.

So you're in great company there.

EPIC FAIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Well it would be more insidious if Jefferson hadn't actually said many things just like this quote.
Such as the one you can find up thread in the snopes link explaining the misattribution of this quote.

So while yes, I got an education as to the dubious nature of this attribution - its not exactly propaganda, seeing as how Jefferson had very nasty things to say about banks, pretty much in complete keeping with the quote erroneously given to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. David Barton would be so proud
That's exactly the argument he used to justify his dishonesty when he was caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Oh for fucks sake.
What do you want me to do? It was pointed out to me, I questioned it a little bit at first, then as the people up thread explained the deal to me, I simply accepted I made a mistake and said so. What else am I supposed to do?

The fact that Jefferson DID in fact feel this way about banks isn't my fault. I can't edit my OP so I can't change to a quote that Jefferson most certainly did give or else I would.

So... how would you have liked me to handle this differently so that you wouldn't need to be an asshole about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. Well here's what I'd like you to do
Next time you decide to pull a "quote" out that is alleged to have been spoken or written by a founding father, VERIFY IT FIRST.

That's all I'll ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. I'll do that when I'm writing professionally. I garunteed to do that before posting to a board.
This is a place for casual anonymous internet chat. I may or may not do investigative research before posting "hey check out this great quote I found" and having someone else correct me about its origin.

If I'm wrong about the origin of some cool quote, the community can correct me and we can all move on, minus the minority of people who get a burr up their ass over it.

Note that you're the only one being a dick here. The rest of people make the corrections, we talked about them, I ultimately accepted them and we all move moved on. :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. Then I will give you shit for posting a bullshit quote
and I won't let up, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
47. Homo?
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 02:16 PM by walldude
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
51. Where are godless communist lattes served?
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 07:37 PM by burning rain
That sounds like my kind of coffee shop! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
52. Jefferson wanted us all to be yeomen farmers and have no industrialization at all..
Edited on Sun Mar-29-09 03:38 AM by Hippo_Tron
He also believed that the supply of land in the United States would be endless, so long as we just keep slaughtering the Indians and taking it from them.

Don't get me wrong, Jefferson was a crucial figure in our history and he is the reason that we have many of the liberties that we do today. But we would probably be a third world country if we had let him control economic policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC