Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holder throws out charges against Ted Stevens

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 11:49 AM
Original message
Holder throws out charges against Ted Stevens
April 1, 2009 ·

The Justice Department on Wednesday asked a federal judge to drop all charges against former Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska.

A jury convicted Stevens last fall of seven counts of lying on his Senate disclosure form in order to conceal $250,000 in gifts from an oil industry executive and other friends. Stevens was the longest-serving Republican in the Senate. However, he lost his bid for an eighth full term in office just days after he was convicted. Since then, charges of prosecutorial misconduct have delayed his sentencing and prompted defense motions for a new trial.

In a move first reported by NPR, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said he has decided to drop the case against Stevens rather than continue to defend the conviction in the face of persistent problems stemming from the actions of prosecutors.

"After careful review, I have concluded that certain information should have been provided to the defense for use at trial," Holder said in a statement Wednesday. "In light of this conclusion, and in consideration of the totality of the circumstances of this particular case, I have determined that it is in the interest of justice to dismiss the indictment and not proceed with a new trial."


U.S. District Court Judge Emmett Sullivan set a hearing April 7 on the motion to dismiss the case.

Stevens' lawyers praised Holder's decision and said it was "justified by the extraordinary evidence of government corruption in the prosecution of Senator Stevens."

The lawyers, Brendan Sullivan and Robert Cary, called the case "a sad story and a warning to everyone. Any citizen can be convicted if prosecutors are hell-bent on ignoring the Constitution and willing to present false evidence."

Stevens said, "I always knew that there would be a day when the cloud that surrounded me would be removed. That day has finally come. It is unfortunate that an election was affected by proceedings now recognized as unfair. It was my great honor to serve the State of Alaska in the United States Senate for 40 years."

Judge Sullivan has repeatedly delayed sentencing and criticized trial prosecutors for what he has called prosecutorial misconduct. At one point, prosecutors were held in contempt. Things got so bad that the Justice Department finally replaced the trial team, including top-ranking officials in the Public Integrity Section, which is charged with prosecuting public corruption cases.

With more ugly hearings expected, Holder is said to have decided late Tuesday to pull the plug. His decision is said to be based on Stevens' age — he's 85 — and the fact that Stevens is no longer in the Senate. Perhaps most importantly, Justice Department officials say Holder wants to send a message to prosecutors throughout the department that actions he regards as misconduct will not be tolerated.

"The Department of Justice must always ensure that any case in which it is involved is handled fairly and consistent with its commitment to justice," Holder said in his statement.

Holder began his career in the Public Integrity Section; and, according to sources, he was horrified by the failure of prosecutors to turn over all relevant materials to the defense.

The attorney general also knows the trial judge, Emmett Sullivan, well. The two men served together as judges of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia before each was promoted to higher office.

Holder respects Judge Sullivan and reportedly has watched with growing alarm as the judge repeatedly has scolded prosecutors for failing to follow his judicial orders to fully inform defense lawyers about everything from potentially favorable evidence to the travel plans of witnesses. During the trial, prosecutorial missteps led the judge to instruct the jury to disregard some evidence.


Sentencing has been repeatedly delayed. By last month, it was playing a back seat to charges of prosecutorial misconduct — as a whistle-blowing FBI agent made complaints about improper conduct by a fellow agent and prosecutors. With a hearing scheduled in two weeks to explore those charges, Holder decided to review the case himself.

Justice Department officials say they will withdraw their opposition to the defense motion for a new trial and will dismiss the indictment — in effect voiding the Stevens conviction.

Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK), who defeated Stevens in the November election, called the decision to end Stevens' prosecution "reasonable."

"I always said I didn't think Senator Stevens should serve time in jail and hopefully this decision ensures that is the case," Begich said. "It's time for Senator Stevens, his family and Alaskans to move on and put this behind us."

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=102589818


Sounds like Holder and the judge are pretty close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is one of those things that sucks but is understandable.
The appropriate people to blame I think would be a Bush-era DOJ and those particular prosecutors. It seems like you are trying to imply that Holder's familiarity with the Judge resulted in some sort of politically motivated decision. I don't think that's the case.

I think that Holder regrettably knew that thanks to the bumbling ineptitude that came before him, this was not going to go anywhere good, but only drag on in continuing embarrassment of the Justice Department, where the DOJ ends up being the one on trial in a what would surely be a media circus.

Holder got handed a pile of crap with this. I'm sad to see this happen, but not reading to blame Holder for making this decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like Bushie prosecutors deliberately screwed the case.
A wink and a nod to a fellow corrupt Republican.

Holder had already fired the prosecution team to deal with this mess, but it turns out they did too much damage.

Unlike Stevens, Holder actually has integrity, and chose to follow the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If Holder had any of this supposed "integrity" Bush and Cheney would be facing war crimes trials...
...I hope this is a sick April Fool's joke...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No joke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'd like to hear more about this...
is it your opinion that because nothing has taken place yet, nothing will? Do you think it is wise for the Congress to get some crucial legislation passed before taking up the criminal actions of Bush? Do you think that Congress should investigate first, and then a Special Prosecutor be appointed on the basis of the facts that come out of that investigation? Or does none of this matter, but the headline?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalsince1968 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Obama wants to "move forward." He's all about enabling Bushwar crimes and the cover-ups. Why would
Congress do anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. because it's their job?
you know like what happened with Iran/Contra, Watergate...etc. I wish I had one of those crystal balls. Obama did say he wanted to move forward, in the same sentence he also said those who broke the law should be held accountable. I myself think timing is everything. Of course, if people really wanted to get something going they would hound their representatives to death..but that is too much to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalsince1968 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. A-fucking-MEN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. and the hits just keep on a coming.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. I just watched court tv discussing this case. If you will remember
the judge in the case was pretty ticked at the prosecutors through out. They mucked up what should have been a simple case for even a first year law student. Did they do it purposely? Who knows, but according to the information I heard them discussing, they were wrong and helped this criminal get off. You can't with hold evidence no matter who the villain is. Thank God he's no longer in the senate. There's nothing they can do about that. Holder had no choice, the prosecutors blew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. If their purpose was to cause him to lose reelection
then they did well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I bet he'd rather lose the election in exchange for not going to jail. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. A wise and prudent choice from Mr. Holder
Ted Stevens is a nice old man who made a little mistake. We should forgive him and move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I would hope that's sarcasm
but considering you avatar, I have no idea what to make of your comment....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. a message approved by the ABA types who defend political cronies from their glass towers
Edited on Wed Apr-01-09 10:28 PM by Supersedeas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. I only wish this was an April Fool's joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Traveling_Home Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Are the Dept Of Justice ...

prosecutors going to jail for prosecutorial misconduct. At least are they being fired and strip of all government pensions and benefits and disbarred.

The Government hiding evidence from a defendent in a criminal trial is worthy of severest punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Is this what they mean when it really comes down to it both parties are in bed toghether?
They know they have to work off one another, keep third parties from popping up while we get fucked going back & forth, up & down through out our whole lives!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. So when are we going to hear about theDon Siegleman or Paul Minor cases?
These are two blatant cases of abuse, have been going on longer, and ought to be remedied ASAP.

We could allow Stevens to rot for a bit first. I don't think his case should be priority one.

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm now thinking this was done as a message - i.e., ""Don't hold
your breath regarding prosecution of Bush/Cheney/et.al.!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. It's more important then ever to investigate them
Especially with the Hersh report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Justice Must Be Served
Even when it's people that we don't like. The prosecutor fucked up big time. That may have been tolerated under the previous Administration, but not now.

Besides, we now have a Democratic Senator from Alaska in there, Mark Begich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. If the Constitution of the United States Does Not Protect The So-Called Worst of Us
then it cannot protect the best of us either. I wish I could remember where/who that quote was by.

Brady vs. Maryland 1963
The Supreme Court held that suppression of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violated the Due Process Clause, U.S. Const. amend. XIV, where the evidence was material to guilt or punishment, regardless of the state's good or bad faith.

It doesn't matter who the defendant is or what he/she has been accused of, a prosecutor cannot suppress evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
24. He did the right thing. It was prosecutorial misconduct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Undercurrent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
26. .
I'm sure there was no joy in this for Holder, but right is right.

Stevens is a slug bucket, but if the system was twisted to nail him it was wrong. Hope the trend of undoing the wrongs committed by the Bush UNjustice system continues to include Don Siegleman and others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
27. Stevens is what, 84?
He's a scumdog senator; everyone knows he's sleaze, and his career's over. I think that's enough in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC