Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gingrinch goes on Faux and plays the role of tough guy. "I would've disabled missile."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:25 AM
Original message
Gingrinch goes on Faux and plays the role of tough guy. "I would've disabled missile."
Gingrich: I would've disabled missile
By MIKE ALLEN | 4/5/09 9:40 AM EDT Text Size:

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told “Fox News Sunday” that he would have disabled the long-range missile before North Korea launched it, saying too many people “do not appreciate the scale of the threat that is evolving on the planet.”

“One morning, just like 9/11, there’s going to be a disaster,” Gingrich said. “I have yet to see the United Nations do anything effective with either Iran or North Korea.”

Reacting to President Barack Obama’s speech in Prague, Gingrich called the plan for a Global Summit on Nuclear Security a “wonderful fantasy idea,” saying Russia and other nations can’t be trusted.

“What are they going to promise, and why would we believe them?” Gingrich said. “It’s very dangerous to have a fantasy foreign policy, and it can get you in enormous trouble.”

Host Chris Wallace asked Gingrich: “So you’re saying that President Gingrich would have taken out that” missile?

Gingrich replied: “There are three or four techniques that could have been used, from unconventional forces to standoff capabilities, to say: ‘We’re not going to tolerate a North Korean missile launch, period.’ I mean, the world’s either got to decide that North Korea is utterly dangerous … I’d recommend, look at electromagnetic pulse, which changes every … equation about how risky these weapons are.”

<SNIP>

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/20903.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's a hell of a man, that Newt Gingrich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yep. He-Man Newtie would've snuck right over to that missile
dressed like a ninja, with a pliers in his teeth, and disabled the thing his very own self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. I'm surprised he can walk with those
ginormous testicles dragging around behind him.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. Hi, cliffordu. Yep. Ol' Newt thinks he's the cock of the walk. He's got far less charm
than Huckabee and far less money than Mittens, and I'm still not seeing him wading through the pig shit in Iowa a few weeks before the caucus extolling the virtues of ethanol.

Maybe he has more cards up his sleeve than I think. But I just don't feel that he has a clear shot at the GOP nomination.

Also he looks like a Pokemon character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Blah blah blah
Anyone can talk tough when he or she is standing on the outside looking in.
And why is Gingrich even relevant anymore? Screw him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Words from the side that is the loser: I would have. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. If this guy is the 2012 nominee I am going to be so pissed. I loathe him!!
I don't even love to hate him. I just hate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Aw C'mon a Newtie /Moosilini ticket would be sweet!
and just too damn easy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Spoken like a typical Republicon Homelander Chickenhawk
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 09:31 AM by SpiralHawk
Republicon Chickenhawks like to talk tough -- witness Commander AWOL Buh, Dickie 'Five Military Deferments' Cheney, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Beck, and Hannity.

But when it comes to actually serving America, they are kicking back by the pool with a Long Island Ice Tea swilling down Viagra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. fuck off newt, you are an irrelevant blowhard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah right, just like his boy Dubya shut them down.
What a surprise they're still around shooting off missiles after 8 years of brilliant foreign policy from Newt's party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. “It’s very dangerous to have a fantasy foreign policy,..
...and it can get you in enormous trouble.”

That would very accurately describe the chimp/GOP foreign policy.

Project much, Newt? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. If ditzboy Gingrich has any innovation to make to that mix....
it would be an addition of sci fi / futurism.

A college sophomore should be embarrassed to adopt absurd new fancies all the time the way Newton does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. And then once it was disabled, Newt would have told it he wants a divorce.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. ROTFLMAO!!!!!!
DUzy Award big time!!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. DUzy DUzy DUzy DUzy !!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Bravo
:handclap:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Ohhh Yeah! ROTFLMAO! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Winnah!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerousRhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. HAHAHA. I have never called for one before, but DUzy for sure.
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 06:32 PM by DangerousRhythm
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. -- --
:thumbsup: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. Newt would have voted "NO" on Korean missiles.
That's his one gimmick. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. "fantasy foreign policy". Such as "we'll be greeted as liberators"?
Such as " And a year from now, I'll be very surprised if there is not some grand square in Baghdad that is named after President Bush."?

Or perhaps "There’s a lot of money to pay for this that doesn’t have to be U.S. taxpayer money" ..."We’re dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon."

Maybe "fantasy foreign policy" would include "Well, the Office of Management and Budget, has come up come up with a number that's something under $50 billion for the cost." and this; "The American part of this will be 1.7 billion. We have no plans for any further-on funding for this."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. I have a fantasy of Newt riding on the missile itself, as in Dr Strangelove...
Shooting up into the skies, and falling into the Pacific.

But I don't want to pollute the Pacific Ocean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. I didn't realize that Newt had such stealth, super-secret operative training.
To be able to sneak into N. Korea do such a thing.

Let's parachute him into N. Korea so he can do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
19. super-impose Newt's (the crybaby tantrum thrower) head on Slim Pickens'
body in "Dr. Strangelove" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. Before or after he called in Dobson, Oral Roberts Jr, Pat Robertson and others for a prayer vigil?
Before or after he begs and cries for them to not deploy their test missle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. "Stupid is as stupid does."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. With what? Our missile defense systems are pathetic and don't really work
"All the trials run so far - successful or otherwise - have been rigged. The target, its type, trajectory and destination, are known before the test begins. Only one enemy missile is used, as the system doesn't have a hope in hell of knocking down two or more. If decoy missiles are deployed, they bear no resemblance to the target and they are identified as decoys in advance. In order to try to enhance the appearance of success, recent flight tests have become even less realistic: the agency has now stopped using decoys altogether when testing its GMD system.

This points to one of the intractable weaknesses of missile defence: it is hard to see how the interceptors could ever outwit enemy attempts to confuse them. As Philip Coyle - formerly a senior official at the Pentagon with responsibility for missile defence - points out, there are endless means by which another state could fool the system. For every real missile it launched, it could dispatch a host of dummies with the same radar and infra-red signatures. Even balloons or bits of metal foil would render anything resembling the current system inoperable. You can reduce a missile's susceptibility to laser penetration by 90% by painting it white. This sophisticated avoidance technology, available from your local hardware shop, makes another multibillion component of the programme obsolete. Or you could simply forget about ballistic missiles and attack using cruise missiles, against which the system is useless."
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/08/19/11068

Its ridiculous to think otherwise. Newt = stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. And then North Korea would have taken out South Korea and
the American troops in between would be dead. Then Japan might get in the game to stop a pre-emptive strike and China would be pissed at Japan and next thing you know it's WWIII. Good idea, Newtie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheltiemama Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. "President Gingrich." *Shudder.*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yes Newt, we definitely want to get involved in a third war now
Great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
32. How many times will they address him as President Gingrich?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
35. Everything old is apparently new again with the Repub. party. I bet he runs
for president in '12.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
36. Obama is actually a leader on nuclear proliferation
the first thing he did as senator is ask to be part of Richard Lugar's proliferation work.

And he has gotten significant antiproliferation legislation passed.

Gingrich is just talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
37. I wonder how he would have disabled it?
Served it divorce papers like he did his cancer stricken wife?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC