|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Median Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 12:25 AM Original message |
Conservadems (Bayh) - Continue to Oppose Giving Bankruptcy Courts Any Power To Modify Mortgages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. Why should Bayh want to make it harder to modify mortgages? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Median Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 12:33 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. What Happened To Republican Outrage At Banks? First, They Oppose Compensation Limits... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 10:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. The "conservadems" are corporatist DINOs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 10:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. If you turn the screws too much on banks, some of them may become insolvent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 12:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Is there any corporatist behavior that's bad enough for you NOT to make excuses for it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Will making further poor business decision make banks more solvent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Simple answer: they're holding out for more taxpayer subsidies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Median Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. They Can't Due To Securitization Of Loans... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 05:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. What part of "a reworked mortgage is better than having the borrower walk away" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Heaven forfend! Next thing you know, you "free market" types will demand a taxpayer bailout! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. You are advocating policies which will cause the banks to ask for further bailouts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 03:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. There is a *tiny* nuance that you're missing here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Median Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Isn't A Reduced Principal Mortgage Better Than A Foreclosed Mortgage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liskddksil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
3. these guys should just join the republicans already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
4. Why are they dems? I don't get it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 10:31 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. He's not. DINO. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
5. Bayh can go to Hell. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. More evidence Congress does not really work for us, but for the special interests. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 01:38 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Yes, the banking interests give lots of money to both the republicans and the democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-08-09 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
16. the Elitist wing of the DLC wants more More MORE leeway for Banks & Mort. Cos. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC