Jonathan Turley - An Overrated, Overquoted One Trick Pro-Impeachment Pony?

[Median Democrat]

Is there any President over the past three administrations that Jonathan Turley has not claimed was engaging in illegal acts, and that he did not want to impeach? Turley testified in favor of the impeachment of Bill Clinton, which I think completely destroy his credibility.

I do think that the impeachment of Bush would have been completely justified, but now we have Turley getting an amazing amount of air time to essentially argue that President Obama is breaking the law.

My question is why shouldn't I dismiss Jonathan Turley as a kook, particularly after he testified in favor of the impeachment of Bill Clinton?

Has Jonathan Turley won any trials or significant cases? Has he written any influential books? Has he ever served as an appellate court judge and authored any notable opinions?

My point is what makes Professor Turley anything more than a media whore and a one trick pony who is willing to argue that the President is breaking the law, and can be impeached for not doing X?

[madfloridian]

1. So now DU is going after Turley?

Because he disagreed with Obama?

[hlthe2b]

2. My thoughts, exactly...

I'm getting really pissed at these predictable patterns of attack any time someone says one thing that isn't totally in tuned with some DUers beliefs...

[Supersedeas]

12. you knew that it was only a matter of time

[Median Democrat]

16. Well, What Are His Qualifications? Republicans Uncrtitically Cite Jerome Corsi

Are you saying that DUers are no different?

[hlthe2b]

21. He has a website with all kinds of info about himself & qualifications

Why not take a look?... Google is your friend.

[Median Democrat]

24. Took A Look - See Below - Not Exactly Laurence Tribe

This is why I posted the question. I looked at his background, and he looks like a media whore, rather than a serious constitutional scholar. For example, where are his books, yet he says he is a nationally recognized constitutional scholar? Based on what exactly?

Doesn't a "scholar" have to do a little more than write opinion pieces? Where's the serious legal work?

[hlthe2b]

25. I find you to be overly combative ...

and with your mind apparently quite made up. I choose not to play.

[Median Democrat]

29. What books has Turley, the Self-Described Scholar, Written?

Simple question. I used google. See the answer for your self if you don't trust me.

[hlthe2b]

32. Go to a law search engine or law library....

You would have to be an idiot to rely on Google for peer reviewed medical journal searches or similarly, legal searches-- that is if you REALLY care to find out for sure.

[Median Democrat]

34. Let Me Guess - Turley is modest, which is why he doesn't list them?

I also checked Amazon, but maybe he does not sell his books. He just gives them away for free? Help a fellow DUer out. You seem to think he has written some books. Enlighten us.

[hlthe2b]

39. FOR THE THIRD TIME,

TURLEY, JONATHAN


BOOKS

A Guide to Citizen Law Enforcement: Fighting Environmental Crime at Facilities of the U.S. Department of Energy and Defense. Santa Barbara, CA: Project for Participatory Democracy, 1996.


POPS, Project for Older Prisoners: A Report to the State of New York. New York: Project for Older Prisoners, 1996.


Preliminary Report on Criminal Environmental Prosecution by the United States Department of Justice. Washington, DC: The Environmental Crimes Project, National Law Center, The George Washington University, 1992.



LAW REVIEW ARTICLES & CHAPTERS IN BOOKS

"Too Clever By Half: The Unconstitutionality of Partial Respresentation of the District of Columbia in Congress," 76 The George Washington Law Review 305-374 (2008).


(With Vitiello, Michael; Clark Kelso; Erwin Chemerinsky; Kevin R. Reitz; & Franklin E. Zimring). ""A Proposal for a Wholesale Reform of California's Sentencing Practice and Policy."" 38 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 9-3-966 (2004).


"Unpacking the Court: The Case for the Expansion of the United States Supreme Court in the Twenty-First Century." 33 Perspectives on Political Science, no. 3, p. 155 (June 22, 2004).


"Pax Militaris: The Feres Doctrine and the Retention of Sovereign Immunity in the Military System of Governance." 71 George Washington Law Review 1-90 (2003).


"Presidential Papers and Popular Government: The Convergence of Constitutional and Property Theory in Claims of Ownership and Control of Presidential Records." 88 Cornell Law Review 651-732 (2003).


"The Military Pocket Republic." 97 Northwestern University Law Review 1-133 (2002).


"Tribunals and Tribulations: The Antithetical Elements of Military Governance in a Madisonian Democracy." 70 George Washington Law Review 649-768 (2002).


"Paradise Lost: The Clinton Administration and the Erosion of Executive Privilege." 60 Maryland Law Review 205-248 (2001).


"The Constitutional Guild: The Problem with Banality in Constitutional Law." 96 Northwestern University Law Review 335-338 (2001).


"A Crisis of Faith: Tobacco and the Madisonian Democracy." 37 Harvard Journal on Legislation 433-481 (2000).


"From Pillar to Post: The Prosecution of American Presidents." 37 American Criminal Law Review 1049-1106 (2000).


"Hold Government Accountable for its Environmental Misconduct." 15 Legal Backgrounder, no. 50 (Oct. 20, 2000).

Reprinted in 21 Hazardous Waste Litigation Reporter, no. 6, p. 16 (Feb. 2, 2001).

"Through a Looking Glass Darkly: National Security and Statutory Interpretation." 53 SMU Law Review 205-249 (2000).


"Transformative Justice and the Ethos of Nuremberg." 33 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 655-680 (2000).


"Congress as Grand Jury: The Role of the House of Representatives in the Impeachment of an American President." 67 George Washington Law Review 735-790 (1999).


"Reflections on Murder, Misdemeanors, and Madison." 28 Hofstra Law Review 439-471 (1999).


"Senate Trials and Factional Disputes: Impeachment as a Madisonian Device." 49 Duke Law Journal 1-146 (1999).


"The Executive Function Theory, the Hamilton Affair, and other Constitutional Mythologies." 77 North Carolina Law Review 1791-1866 (1999).


"Part I: Liberty, Property, and Environmental Ethics." (Panel Discussion: Federalist Society Symposium: The Environment and the Law). 21 Ecology Law Quarterly 387-429 (1994).


"Preserve the Group's Consensus." (The Forum: Sentencing Corporate Polluters). 11 The Environmental Forum 43-44 (Apr. 1994).


"Dualistic Values in the Age of International Legisprudence." 44 Hastings Law Journal 185-272 (1993).


"Transnational Discrimination and the Economics of Extraterritorial Regulation." 70 Boston University Law Review 339-393 (1990).


"'When in Rome': Multinational Misconduct and the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality." 84 Northwestern University Law Review 598-664 (1990).


"Laying Hands on Religious Racketeers: Applying Civil RICO to Fraudulent Religious Solicitations." 29 William and Mary Law Review 441-500 (1988)


"The Not-So-Noble Lie: The Nonincorporation of State Consensual Surveillance Standards in Federal Court." 79 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 66-134 (1988).


"The RICO Lottery and the Gains Multiplication Approach: An Alternative Measurement of Damages under Civil RICO." 33 Villanova Law Review 239-280 (1988).


"Introduction: The Hitchhiker's Guide to CLS, Unger, and Deep Thought." 81 Northwestern University Law Review 593-620 (1987).


"United States v. McNulty: Title III and the Admissibility in Federal Court of Illegally Gathered State Evidence." 80 Northwestern University Law Review 1714-1752 (1986).



OTHER

"The Door to Room 204." USA Today p. 11A (Apr. 25, 2007).

"The Truth About Oaths." USA Today p. 9A (Jan. 4, 2007).

"Can Congress Stop the War?" USA Today p. 13A (Jan. 18, 2007).

"The Fight Over D.C.; Too Clever by Half: The Unconstitutional D.C. Voting Rights Bill." Roll Call (Jan. 25, 1007).

"War - What is it Good For?" USA Today p. 11A (Feb. 15, 2007).

"My Boys Like Shootouts. What's Wrong With That?" The Washington Post p. B01 (Feb. 25, 2007).

"Justice? What a Joke." USA Today p. 21A (Mar. 27, 2007).

"Equal Rights Redux: The Three-State Solution." Los Angeles Times p. M3 (Apr. 8, 2007).

"Feres Follies." USA Today p. 13A (Apr. 12, 2007).

"The Revival of the Equal Rights Amendment." Roll Call (Apr. 16, 2007).

"The Land of $9 Million: Anyone Can Run for Public Office, Right?" USA Today p. 13A (May 16, 2007).

"Jefferson Deserves Presumption of Innovence." Roll Call (June 7, 2007).

"The History of Oaths." USA Today p. 9A (Jan. 4, 2007).

"What Our Soldiers Really Need: Lawyers." USA Today p. 13A (Apr. 12, 2007).

"When Law Schools Take the Low Road." New Jersey Law Journal (Jan. 16, 2006).

"It's Not Black and White." USA Today p. 21A (Dec. 6, 2006).

"Our Loquacious Justices." Los Angeles Times (Mar. 28, 2006) at B13.

"The Buck (Fever) Stops Here: Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety." The Washington Post p. B04 (Feb 19, 2006).

"Troubling Times: A Troubling Nominee: Why Alito's Deference to the Powerful Should Worry You--Especially Today." USA Today p. 13A (Jan 10, 2006).

"Tackling a Judge's Ideology: Alito Appears to be the Bob Newhart of Judging, Delivering Deadpan Decisions That Make Him Difficult to Lionize or Demonize." Chicago Tribune p. C9 (Jan. 8, 2006).

"Eight Simple Steps to a Swiffer Congress." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Jan. 5, 2006).

"'Big Brother' Bush and Connecting the Data Dots." Los Angeles Times p. B15 (June 24, 2006).

"Issue of Hypocrisy." 27 National Law Journal no. 68, p. 23 (Jan. 9, 2006).

"How to End the Same-Sex Marriage Debate." USA Today p. 15A (Apr. 3, 2006).

"Living in a City of Spies." The Baltimore Sun p. 15A (May 3, 2006).

"Down to the Fourth Estate." USA Today p. 11A (May 17, 2006).

"Lap Dances, Wills and You: Anna Nicole Smith Gets Her Day in Court Today." USA Today p. 13A (Feb. 28, 2006).

"A Question of Ethics." USA Today p. 13A (Nov. 14, 2006).

"Constitutional Swag." Roll Call (June 19, 2006).

"Gen. Hayden Earns His 'Bones' and a Nomination." Chicago Tribune p. C27 (May 10, 2006).

"Well-Paved Road to Political Perdition." Chicago Tribune p. C7 (June 25, 2006).

"The Case for Macroscopic Humans." USA Today p. 13A (July 18, 2006).

"A War With Flags But No Faces." USA Today p. 11A (Aug. 17, 2006).

"NSA Ruling Much Like a Pig in Parlor." Chicago Tribune p. C5 (Aug. 20, 2006).

"Why Race-Based 'Survivor' Makes Us Squirm." USA Today p. 13A (Sept. 14, 2006).

"Give the Dead Their Due." The Washington Post p. B01 (Sept. 17, 2006).

"Get Congress Out of the Page Business." New York Times p. 31A (Oct. 4, 2006).

"The Roberts Court: Seeing is Believing." USA Today p. 11A (July 6, 2006).

"Insanity's Legal Fall from Grace." USA Today p. 13A (May 30, 2006).

"A Page Protection Act: The Path to Saving a History Program." Roll Call (Oct. 5, 2006).

"An 'Old' Prison Solution." Los Angeles Times p. B17 (Oct. 7, 2006).

"109th Congress Just Can't Resist." USA Today p. 13A (Oct. 19, 2006).

"The Nomination of John Roberts. It's Time to be Afraid, Very Afraid." Chicago Tribune p. C9 (July 24, 2005).

"A Right Turn on the High Court?" USA Today p. 13A (June 27, 2005).

"Candidates for the Supreme Court: Judging the Short List." USA Today p. 13A (June 27, 2005).

"So What's the Story on Bob Novak? His Decision to Play It Cagey in the Plame Case is Helping No One." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (July 1, 2005).

"To Improve the Supreme Court, Let's Expand It." Roll Call (July 19, 2005).

"Democrats' Disarray Muddies Court Fight." The Baltimore Sun p. 21A (July 14, 2005).

"Michael, Meet Fatty. And Errol and Martha and . . ." The Washington Post p. B01 (June 19, 2005).

"Military Scapegoats Walk a Well-Worn Path." USA Today p. 13A (June 7, 2005).

"When is Violent Speech Still Free Speech?" USA Today p. 13A (May 3, 2005).

"The Not So Dirty Dozen: They're the Undercard to the Fight Over a High Court Nomination." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Apr. 18, 2005).

"Dissing the Dead to Save the Accused: Blake Lawyers Used an Old Technique." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Mar. 4, 2005).

"Estrich's Vicious Attack." The Washington Times p. A19 (Mar. 14, 2005).

"The Faith of John Roberts." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (July 25, 2005).

"Mr. Frist Goes to Washington." U.S.A. Today p. 15A (Apr. 7, 2005).

"What Qualifies One for the Supreme Court?" USA Today p. 13A (Oct. 6, 2005).

"Temptation Tops the Constitution." U.S.A. Today p. 13A (Mar. 23, 2005).

"Bob Woodward's Belated Disclosure Raises Troubling Questions." The Baltimore Sun p. 27A (Nov. 17, 2005).

"Bush and Domestic Spying: Good for America?" USA Today p. 11A (Dec. 22, 2005).

"After the Hurricanes, It's Raining Money." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Sept. 28, 2005).

"A Parent's Right to Know." USA Today p. 13A (Dec. 6, 2005).

"A Model for the Future." 27 National Law Journal no. 26, p. 27 (Aug. 1, 2005).

"The Crazy World of Insanity Law." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (Nov. 11, 2005).

"Chicago's Segregted Schools." Chicago Tribune p. C25 (Nov. 10, 2005).

"Wanted: A Redeeming Character." USA Today p. 15A (Nov. 1, 2005).

"Bork is Owed an Explanation." 27 National Law Journal no. 55, p. 30 (Oct. 3, 2005).

"Roberts the Elder." Village Voice p. 24 (Sept. 20, 2005).

"Shame on You: Enough with the Humiliating Punishments, Judges." The Washington Post p. B03 (Sept. 18, 2005).

"Role Models for Roberts." USA Today p. 23A (Sept. 12, 2005).

"Roberts: The Before and The After." USA Today p. 13A (Aug. 31, 2005).

"When Justices Won't Go." Los Angeles Times p. B19 (Aug. 13, 2005).

"Our Forgotten Citizens." 26 National Law Journal no. 63, p. 34 (Dec. 20, 2004).

"A Check on Wartime Power." 26 National Law Journal no. 75, p. 26 (Mar. 7, 2005).

"Not as Radical as All That." (Editorial on Supreme Court's decision on gay rights in Lawrence v. Texas.) 25 Legal Times no. 46, p. 31 (July 14, 2003).

" . . . 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19." (Editorial on increasing the size of the Supreme Court.) 26 Legal Times no. 32, p. 50 (Aug. 11, 2003).

"Seeing Red on Blue Slips." Los Angeles Times (May 16, 2001) at pt. 2, p.13.

"The Ghost Fleet and other Dumb Ideas." Chicago Tribune (May 20, 2001) at p. 21.

"Bush Loses Senate." Washington Times (May 29, 2001) at A15.

"Nation of Mutts in a Muddle." Los Angeles Times (July 3, 2001), at p.2, p. 13.

"Is This Beach Clean Enough? Despite Progress, Serious Environmental Risks Remain." Legal Times (May 29, 2000) at 66.

"Citizen Clinton is Not Above the Law." Newsday (Aug. 21, 2000) at A23.

"Lawyers and the Lynching." National Law Journal (Aug. 7, 2000) at A1.

"Selective Prosecution: Don't Confuse Charles Bakaly with Bill Clinton." Washington Times (July 24, 2000) at A19.

"Telling What Wasn't Secret." New York Times (July 17, 2000) at A19.

"Ray is Damned if He Does or if He Doesn't." Los Angeles Times (Aug. 22, 2000) at B9.

"Court Strikes Health Balance on HMO's." Wall Street Journal (June 13, 2000) at A26.

"Of Boy Scouts and Bigots." Chicago Tribune (June 30, 2000) at 27.

"Clinton Fully Merits Being Disbarred." Newsday (May 25, 2000) at A51.

"Navy Undermines Client Privilege." National Law Journal (Apr. 3, 2000) at A22.

"A Bad Canadian Heads South." Wall Street Journal (Feb. 28, 2000) at A41.

"The Mouse that Roared - and Voted." Los Angeles Times (Jan. 17, 2000) at B5.

"'Miranda' - Confirmed but Barely Alive." Washington Post (June 27, 2000) at A23.

"History Shows Ballot Fights can Wound President." USA Today (Nov. 13, 2000) at 31A.

"Vote of Congress May Offer Real Political Closure." USA Today (Nov. 22, 2000) at 29A.

"Presidential Transition in Amber." USA Today (Dec. 5, 2000) at 17A.

"The Scariest Part may be Yet to Come." Los Angeles Times (Dec. 8, 2000) at B9.

"Perspective on Justice." Los Angeles Times (June 19, 2000) at B7.

"A Farewell to Sid Yates." Chicago Tribune (Oct. 10, 2000) at p. 15.

"The Trial Lawyer of the Century." Legal Times (Nov. 29, 1999) at 50.

"Senators Prefer Politics to their Roles as Jurors." National Law Journal (Jan. 25, 1999) at A27.

"What's Wrong with Wright." Wall Street Journal (Apr. 19, 1999) at A22.

"A Verdict in a Land of No Absolutes." Newsday (Feb. 15, 1999) at A29.

"Bad Timing on Contempt Ruling." Wall Street Journal (May 4, 1999) at A23.

"The Right Verdict? It's All Relative." Los Angeles Times (Feb. 12, 1999) at A7.

"Pulp Justice." Los Angeles Times (May 5, 1999) at A7.

"Could this Case be the End of TV Talk Show Traps?" USA Today (May 13, 1999) at 15A.

"Trial and Error." 51 National Review 22 (Feb. 8, 1999).

"Talk Show Tort Wars Ahead." National Law Journal (June 7, 1999) at A29.

"You Don't Impeach a Chief Executive Officer." National Law Journal (Mar. 1, 1999) at A22.

"The New Profiteers of the Tobacco War." Wall Street Journal (Sept. 20, 1999) at A29.

"The Trial of the Century." Legal Times (Sept. 27, 1999) at 27.

"Reforming the Great American Litigation Lottery." Chicago Tribune (Oct. 31, 1999) at A19.

"Madison Felled by Tobacco?" National Law Journal (Dec. 13, 1999) at A28.

"Last Rites for the Independent Counsel Act." The Chicago Tribune (June 30, 1999) at A21.

"Nothing Bars Questioning President's Bad Ideas." Los Angeles Times (Sept. 27, 1999) at B7.

"The President Resorts to Jury Nullification." Wall Street Journal (Dec. 15, 1998) at A22.

"Clinton's Nullification Strategy of Last Resort." National Law Journal (July 13, 1998) at A19.

"Guarding the King, Not his Secrets." Legal Times (Feb. 2, 1998) at 28.

"Clinton Maneuvers Threaten his Office." National Law Journal (Feb. 23, 1998) at A19.

"Grand Jury as Grand Opera." Legal Times (Feb. 23, 1998) at 31.

"The Paula Jones Case Under a Suppression Strategy." Los Angeles Times (Apr. 3, 1998) at A11.

"The Jones Case: Too Fast on the Escape." Newsday (Apr. 7, 1998) at A43.

"The President and the Damage Done." Legal Times (Apr. 20, 1998) at 24.

"Praetorian Privilege." Wall Street Journal (Apr. 27, 1998) at A23.

"The Trouble with Hubble." The Chicago Tribune (May 3, 1998) at A11.

"Call Clinton to Grand Jury." National Law Journal (May 4, 1998) at A21.

"How We Try Our Leaders." Legal Times (Dec. 21, 1998) at 39.

"Why Clinton Wants to be Impeached." Wall Street Journal (July 6, 1998) at A15.

"Without Testimony or a Trial, Censure is Harmless Precedent." USA Today (Dec. 23, 1998) at 13A.

"Hashing Out Ockham's Razor over Eggs." The Chicago Tribune (July 13, 1998) at A11.

"Witness for the Prosecution." The Chicago Tribune (Aug. 30, 1998) at 19.

"A Little Bit Impeached." Legal Times (Sept. 7, 1998) at 25.

"Perjury is not Politics." Wall Street Journal (Sept. 14, 1998) at A23.

"Impeachment." USA Today (Sept. 14, 1998) at 10A.

"The New Originalists." Legal Times (Oct. 19, 1998) at 27.

"High Crimes and Misdemeanors, According to the Framers." Wall Street Journal (Nov. 9, 1998) at A15.

"Checking the Executive Pulse." Los Angeles Times (Nov. 19, 1998) at A11.

"Is He Too Popular to Impeach?" Los Angeles Times (Dec. 9, 1998) at A15.

"Why the President Must be Impeached." The Baltimore Sun (Dec. 11, 1998) at 33A.

"Don't Confuse Remedies and Penalties." Newsday (Dec. 18, 1998) at A73.

"The Approaching Constitutional Crisis." The Chicago Tribune (June 5, 1998) at A13.

"Bill of Attainder." Los Angeles Times (Feb. 26, 1996) at B4.

"One American at a Time: Legislating by Bill of Attainder." Legal Times (Feb. 26, 1996) at 29.

"Federalizing a Custody Case." The Washington Post (Feb. 10, 1996) at A22.

"Legislating Values for One Family at a Time." Washington Times (Mar. 26, 1996) at A15.

"A Model Senator: When Does Corporate Publicity Become Political Contribution?" Legal Times (Apr. 18, 1996) at 24.

"Black Bag Justice." Legal Times (Nov. 21, 1994) at 28.

"The Government Versus the Grand Jury." The Chicago Tribune (Sept. 23, 1993) at A11.

"A Simple Matter of Retaliation." Legal Times (Jan. 25, 1993) at 43.

"Crimes Against the Environment." Wall Street Journal (Feb. 3, 1993) at A15.

"Environmental Crime." Time (Feb. 22, 1993) at 10

"We Need to Unearth Environmental Felons." Wall Street Journal (Mar. 11, 1993) at A15.

"Free the Rocky Flats 13." The Washington Post (Aug. 13, 1993) at A11.

"Environmental Law and Order: New Administration Should End Lax Enforcement of Pollution Laws." 106 The Los Angeles Daily Journal 6 (March 25, 1993).

"A Solution to Prison Overcrowding." USA Today Magazine (Nov. 1992) at 80.

"Why Prison Health Care is a Crime." The Chicago Tribune (Mar. 19, 1991) at A19.

"Our Prison Profiteers." New York Times (Aug. 3, 1990) at A20.

"Solving Prison Overcrowding - Prisons aren't Nursing Homes." New York Times (Oct. 9, 1989) at A17.

"Global Dinosaurs: Charting the Rise and Fall of Great Powers." The Chicago Tribune (May 8, 1988) at 5, 9.

[hlthe2b]

35. Jonathan Turley's Publications...

Boy, this was hard to find...:eyes:.. From the GW faculty profile:

http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.aspx?id=1738#

TURLEY, JONATHAN


BOOKS

A Guide to Citizen Law Enforcement: Fighting Environmental Crime at Facilities of the U.S. Department of Energy and Defense. Santa Barbara, CA: Project for Participatory Democracy, 1996.


POPS, Project for Older Prisoners: A Report to the State of New York. New York: Project for Older Prisoners, 1996.


Preliminary Report on Criminal Environmental Prosecution by the United States Department of Justice. Washington, DC: The Environmental Crimes Project, National Law Center, The George Washington University, 1992.



LAW REVIEW ARTICLES & CHAPTERS IN BOOKS

"Too Clever By Half: The Unconstitutionality of Partial Respresentation of the District of Columbia in Congress," 76 The George Washington Law Review 305-374 (2008).


(With Vitiello, Michael; Clark Kelso; Erwin Chemerinsky; Kevin R. Reitz; & Franklin E. Zimring). ""A Proposal for a Wholesale Reform of California's Sentencing Practice and Policy."" 38 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 9-3-966 (2004).


"Unpacking the Court: The Case for the Expansion of the United States Supreme Court in the Twenty-First Century." 33 Perspectives on Political Science, no. 3, p. 155 (June 22, 2004).


"Pax Militaris: The Feres Doctrine and the Retention of Sovereign Immunity in the Military System of Governance." 71 George Washington Law Review 1-90 (2003).


"Presidential Papers and Popular Government: The Convergence of Constitutional and Property Theory in Claims of Ownership and Control of Presidential Records." 88 Cornell Law Review 651-732 (2003).


"The Military Pocket Republic." 97 Northwestern University Law Review 1-133 (2002).


"Tribunals and Tribulations: The Antithetical Elements of Military Governance in a Madisonian Democracy." 70 George Washington Law Review 649-768 (2002).


"Paradise Lost: The Clinton Administration and the Erosion of Executive Privilege." 60 Maryland Law Review 205-248 (2001).


"The Constitutional Guild: The Problem with Banality in Constitutional Law." 96 Northwestern University Law Review 335-338 (2001).


"A Crisis of Faith: Tobacco and the Madisonian Democracy." 37 Harvard Journal on Legislation 433-481 (2000).


"From Pillar to Post: The Prosecution of American Presidents." 37 American Criminal Law Review 1049-1106 (2000).


"Hold Government Accountable for its Environmental Misconduct." 15 Legal Backgrounder, no. 50 (Oct. 20, 2000).

Reprinted in 21 Hazardous Waste Litigation Reporter, no. 6, p. 16 (Feb. 2, 2001).

"Through a Looking Glass Darkly: National Security and Statutory Interpretation." 53 SMU Law Review 205-249 (2000).


"Transformative Justice and the Ethos of Nuremberg." 33 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 655-680 (2000).


"Congress as Grand Jury: The Role of the House of Representatives in the Impeachment of an American President." 67 George Washington Law Review 735-790 (1999).


"Reflections on Murder, Misdemeanors, and Madison." 28 Hofstra Law Review 439-471 (1999).


"Senate Trials and Factional Disputes: Impeachment as a Madisonian Device." 49 Duke Law Journal 1-146 (1999).


"The Executive Function Theory, the Hamilton Affair, and other Constitutional Mythologies." 77 North Carolina Law Review 1791-1866 (1999).


"Part I: Liberty, Property, and Environmental Ethics." (Panel Discussion: Federalist Society Symposium: The Environment and the Law). 21 Ecology Law Quarterly 387-429 (1994).


"Preserve the Group's Consensus." (The Forum: Sentencing Corporate Polluters). 11 The Environmental Forum 43-44 (Apr. 1994).


"Dualistic Values in the Age of International Legisprudence." 44 Hastings Law Journal 185-272 (1993).


"Transnational Discrimination and the Economics of Extraterritorial Regulation." 70 Boston University Law Review 339-393 (1990).


"'When in Rome': Multinational Misconduct and the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality." 84 Northwestern University Law Review 598-664 (1990).


"Laying Hands on Religious Racketeers: Applying Civil RICO to Fraudulent Religious Solicitations." 29 William and Mary Law Review 441-500 (1988)


"The Not-So-Noble Lie: The Nonincorporation of State Consensual Surveillance Standards in Federal Court." 79 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 66-134 (1988).


"The RICO Lottery and the Gains Multiplication Approach: An Alternative Measurement of Damages under Civil RICO." 33 Villanova Law Review 239-280 (1988).


"Introduction: The Hitchhiker's Guide to CLS, Unger, and Deep Thought." 81 Northwestern University Law Review 593-620 (1987).


"United States v. McNulty: Title III and the Admissibility in Federal Court of Illegally Gathered State Evidence." 80 Northwestern University Law Review 1714-1752 (1986).



OTHER

"The Door to Room 204." USA Today p. 11A (Apr. 25, 2007).

"The Truth About Oaths." USA Today p. 9A (Jan. 4, 2007).

"Can Congress Stop the War?" USA Today p. 13A (Jan. 18, 2007).

"The Fight Over D.C.; Too Clever by Half: The Unconstitutional D.C. Voting Rights Bill." Roll Call (Jan. 25, 1007).

"War - What is it Good For?" USA Today p. 11A (Feb. 15, 2007).

"My Boys Like Shootouts. What's Wrong With That?" The Washington Post p. B01 (Feb. 25, 2007).

"Justice? What a Joke." USA Today p. 21A (Mar. 27, 2007).

"Equal Rights Redux: The Three-State Solution." Los Angeles Times p. M3 (Apr. 8, 2007).

"Feres Follies." USA Today p. 13A (Apr. 12, 2007).

"The Revival of the Equal Rights Amendment." Roll Call (Apr. 16, 2007).

"The Land of $9 Million: Anyone Can Run for Public Office, Right?" USA Today p. 13A (May 16, 2007).

"Jefferson Deserves Presumption of Innovence." Roll Call (June 7, 2007).

"The History of Oaths." USA Today p. 9A (Jan. 4, 2007).

"What Our Soldiers Really Need: Lawyers." USA Today p. 13A (Apr. 12, 2007).

"When Law Schools Take the Low Road." New Jersey Law Journal (Jan. 16, 2006).

"It's Not Black and White." USA Today p. 21A (Dec. 6, 2006).

"Our Loquacious Justices." Los Angeles Times (Mar. 28, 2006) at B13.

"The Buck (Fever) Stops Here: Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety." The Washington Post p. B04 (Feb 19, 2006).

"Troubling Times: A Troubling Nominee: Why Alito's Deference to the Powerful Should Worry You--Especially Today." USA Today p. 13A (Jan 10, 2006).

"Tackling a Judge's Ideology: Alito Appears to be the Bob Newhart of Judging, Delivering Deadpan Decisions That Make Him Difficult to Lionize or Demonize." Chicago Tribune p. C9 (Jan. 8, 2006).

"Eight Simple Steps to a Swiffer Congress." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Jan. 5, 2006).

"'Big Brother' Bush and Connecting the Data Dots." Los Angeles Times p. B15 (June 24, 2006).

"Issue of Hypocrisy." 27 National Law Journal no. 68, p. 23 (Jan. 9, 2006).

"How to End the Same-Sex Marriage Debate." USA Today p. 15A (Apr. 3, 2006).

"Living in a City of Spies." The Baltimore Sun p. 15A (May 3, 2006).

"Down to the Fourth Estate." USA Today p. 11A (May 17, 2006).

"Lap Dances, Wills and You: Anna Nicole Smith Gets Her Day in Court Today." USA Today p. 13A (Feb. 28, 2006).

"A Question of Ethics." USA Today p. 13A (Nov. 14, 2006).

"Constitutional Swag." Roll Call (June 19, 2006).

"Gen. Hayden Earns His 'Bones' and a Nomination." Chicago Tribune p. C27 (May 10, 2006).

"Well-Paved Road to Political Perdition." Chicago Tribune p. C7 (June 25, 2006).

"The Case for Macroscopic Humans." USA Today p. 13A (July 18, 2006).

"A War With Flags But No Faces." USA Today p. 11A (Aug. 17, 2006).

"NSA Ruling Much Like a Pig in Parlor." Chicago Tribune p. C5 (Aug. 20, 2006).

"Why Race-Based 'Survivor' Makes Us Squirm." USA Today p. 13A (Sept. 14, 2006).

"Give the Dead Their Due." The Washington Post p. B01 (Sept. 17, 2006).

"Get Congress Out of the Page Business." New York Times p. 31A (Oct. 4, 2006).

"The Roberts Court: Seeing is Believing." USA Today p. 11A (July 6, 2006).

"Insanity's Legal Fall from Grace." USA Today p. 13A (May 30, 2006).

"A Page Protection Act: The Path to Saving a History Program." Roll Call (Oct. 5, 2006).

"An 'Old' Prison Solution." Los Angeles Times p. B17 (Oct. 7, 2006).

"109th Congress Just Can't Resist." USA Today p. 13A (Oct. 19, 2006).

"The Nomination of John Roberts. It's Time to be Afraid, Very Afraid." Chicago Tribune p. C9 (July 24, 2005).

"A Right Turn on the High Court?" USA Today p. 13A (June 27, 2005).

"Candidates for the Supreme Court: Judging the Short List." USA Today p. 13A (June 27, 2005).

"So What's the Story on Bob Novak? His Decision to Play It Cagey in the Plame Case is Helping No One." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (July 1, 2005).

"To Improve the Supreme Court, Let's Expand It." Roll Call (July 19, 2005).

"Democrats' Disarray Muddies Court Fight." The Baltimore Sun p. 21A (July 14, 2005).

"Michael, Meet Fatty. And Errol and Martha and . . ." The Washington Post p. B01 (June 19, 2005).

"Military Scapegoats Walk a Well-Worn Path." USA Today p. 13A (June 7, 2005).

"When is Violent Speech Still Free Speech?" USA Today p. 13A (May 3, 2005).

"The Not So Dirty Dozen: They're the Undercard to the Fight Over a High Court Nomination." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Apr. 18, 2005).

"Dissing the Dead to Save the Accused: Blake Lawyers Used an Old Technique." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Mar. 4, 2005).

"Estrich's Vicious Attack." The Washington Times p. A19 (Mar. 14, 2005).

"The Faith of John Roberts." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (July 25, 2005).

"Mr. Frist Goes to Washington." U.S.A. Today p. 15A (Apr. 7, 2005).

"What Qualifies One for the Supreme Court?" USA Today p. 13A (Oct. 6, 2005).

"Temptation Tops the Constitution." U.S.A. Today p. 13A (Mar. 23, 2005).

"Bob Woodward's Belated Disclosure Raises Troubling Questions." The Baltimore Sun p. 27A (Nov. 17, 2005).

"Bush and Domestic Spying: Good for America?" USA Today p. 11A (Dec. 22, 2005).

"After the Hurricanes, It's Raining Money." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Sept. 28, 2005).

"A Parent's Right to Know." USA Today p. 13A (Dec. 6, 2005).

"A Model for the Future." 27 National Law Journal no. 26, p. 27 (Aug. 1, 2005).

"The Crazy World of Insanity Law." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (Nov. 11, 2005).

"Chicago's Segregted Schools." Chicago Tribune p. C25 (Nov. 10, 2005).

"Wanted: A Redeeming Character." USA Today p. 15A (Nov. 1, 2005).

"Bork is Owed an Explanation." 27 National Law Journal no. 55, p. 30 (Oct. 3, 2005).

"Roberts the Elder." Village Voice p. 24 (Sept. 20, 2005).

"Shame on You: Enough with the Humiliating Punishments, Judges." The Washington Post p. B03 (Sept. 18, 2005).

"Role Models for Roberts." USA Today p. 23A (Sept. 12, 2005).

"Roberts: The Before and The After." USA Today p. 13A (Aug. 31, 2005).

"When Justices Won't Go." Los Angeles Times p. B19 (Aug. 13, 2005).

"Our Forgotten Citizens." 26 National Law Journal no. 63, p. 34 (Dec. 20, 2004).

"A Check on Wartime Power." 26 National Law Journal no. 75, p. 26 (Mar. 7, 2005).

"Not as Radical as All That." (Editorial on Supreme Court's decision on gay rights in Lawrence v. Texas.) 25 Legal Times no. 46, p. 31 (July 14, 2003).

" . . . 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19." (Editorial on increasing the size of the Supreme Court.) 26 Legal Times no. 32, p. 50 (Aug. 11, 2003).

"Seeing Red on Blue Slips." Los Angeles Times (May 16, 2001) at pt. 2, p.13.

"The Ghost Fleet and other Dumb Ideas." Chicago Tribune (May 20, 2001) at p. 21.

"Bush Loses Senate." Washington Times (May 29, 2001) at A15.

"Nation of Mutts in a Muddle." Los Angeles Times (July 3, 2001), at p.2, p. 13.

"Is This Beach Clean Enough? Despite Progress, Serious Environmental Risks Remain." Legal Times (May 29, 2000) at 66.

"Citizen Clinton is Not Above the Law." Newsday (Aug. 21, 2000) at A23.

"Lawyers and the Lynching." National Law Journal (Aug. 7, 2000) at A1.

"Selective Prosecution: Don't Confuse Charles Bakaly with Bill Clinton." Washington Times (July 24, 2000) at A19.

"Telling What Wasn't Secret." New York Times (July 17, 2000) at A19.

"Ray is Damned if He Does or if He Doesn't." Los Angeles Times (Aug. 22, 2000) at B9.

"Court Strikes Health Balance on HMO's." Wall Street Journal (June 13, 2000) at A26.

"Of Boy Scouts and Bigots." Chicago Tribune (June 30, 2000) at 27.

"Clinton Fully Merits Being Disbarred." Newsday (May 25, 2000) at A51.

"Navy Undermines Client Privilege." National Law Journal (Apr. 3, 2000) at A22.

"A Bad Canadian Heads South." Wall Street Journal (Feb. 28, 2000) at A41.

"The Mouse that Roared - and Voted." Los Angeles Times (Jan. 17, 2000) at B5.

"'Miranda' - Confirmed but Barely Alive." Washington Post (June 27, 2000) at A23.

"History Shows Ballot Fights can Wound President." USA Today (Nov. 13, 2000) at 31A.

"Vote of Congress May Offer Real Political Closure." USA Today (Nov. 22, 2000) at 29A.

"Presidential Transition in Amber." USA Today (Dec. 5, 2000) at 17A.

"The Scariest Part may be Yet to Come." Los Angeles Times (Dec. 8, 2000) at B9.

"Perspective on Justice." Los Angeles Times (June 19, 2000) at B7.

"A Farewell to Sid Yates." Chicago Tribune (Oct. 10, 2000) at p. 15.

"The Trial Lawyer of the Century." Legal Times (Nov. 29, 1999) at 50.

"Senators Prefer Politics to their Roles as Jurors." National Law Journal (Jan. 25, 1999) at A27.

"What's Wrong with Wright." Wall Street Journal (Apr. 19, 1999) at A22.

"A Verdict in a Land of No Absolutes." Newsday (Feb. 15, 1999) at A29.

"Bad Timing on Contempt Ruling." Wall Street Journal (May 4, 1999) at A23.

"The Right Verdict? It's All Relative." Los Angeles Times (Feb. 12, 1999) at A7.

"Pulp Justice." Los Angeles Times (May 5, 1999) at A7.

"Could this Case be the End of TV Talk Show Traps?" USA Today (May 13, 1999) at 15A.

"Trial and Error." 51 National Review 22 (Feb. 8, 1999).

"Talk Show Tort Wars Ahead." National Law Journal (June 7, 1999) at A29.

"You Don't Impeach a Chief Executive Officer." National Law Journal (Mar. 1, 1999) at A22.

"The New Profiteers of the Tobacco War." Wall Street Journal (Sept. 20, 1999) at A29.

"The Trial of the Century." Legal Times (Sept. 27, 1999) at 27.

"Reforming the Great American Litigation Lottery." Chicago Tribune (Oct. 31, 1999) at A19.

"Madison Felled by Tobacco?" National Law Journal (Dec. 13, 1999) at A28.

"Last Rites for the Independent Counsel Act." The Chicago Tribune (June 30, 1999) at A21.

"Nothing Bars Questioning President's Bad Ideas." Los Angeles Times (Sept. 27, 1999) at B7.

"The President Resorts to Jury Nullification." Wall Street Journal (Dec. 15, 1998) at A22.

"Clinton's Nullification Strategy of Last Resort." National Law Journal (July 13, 1998) at A19.

"Guarding the King, Not his Secrets." Legal Times (Feb. 2, 1998) at 28.

"Clinton Maneuvers Threaten his Office." National Law Journal (Feb. 23, 1998) at A19.

"Grand Jury as Grand Opera." Legal Times (Feb. 23, 1998) at 31.

"The Paula Jones Case Under a Suppression Strategy." Los Angeles Times (Apr. 3, 1998) at A11.

"The Jones Case: Too Fast on the Escape." Newsday (Apr. 7, 1998) at A43.

"The President and the Damage Done." Legal Times (Apr. 20, 1998) at 24.

"Praetorian Privilege." Wall Street Journal (Apr. 27, 1998) at A23.

"The Trouble with Hubble." The Chicago Tribune (May 3, 1998) at A11.

"Call Clinton to Grand Jury." National Law Journal (May 4, 1998) at A21.

"How We Try Our Leaders." Legal Times (Dec. 21, 1998) at 39.

"Why Clinton Wants to be Impeached." Wall Street Journal (July 6, 1998) at A15.

"Without Testimony or a Trial, Censure is Harmless Precedent." USA Today (Dec. 23, 1998) at 13A.

"Hashing Out Ockham's Razor over Eggs." The Chicago Tribune (July 13, 1998) at A11.

"Witness for the Prosecution." The Chicago Tribune (Aug. 30, 1998) at 19.

"A Little Bit Impeached." Legal Times (Sept. 7, 1998) at 25.

"Perjury is not Politics." Wall Street Journal (Sept. 14, 1998) at A23.

"Impeachment." USA Today (Sept. 14, 1998) at 10A.

"The New Originalists." Legal Times (Oct. 19, 1998) at 27.

"High Crimes and Misdemeanors, According to the Framers." Wall Street Journal (Nov. 9, 1998) at A15.

"Checking the Executive Pulse." Los Angeles Times (Nov. 19, 1998) at A11.

"Is He Too Popular to Impeach?" Los Angeles Times (Dec. 9, 1998) at A15.

"Why the President Must be Impeached." The Baltimore Sun (Dec. 11, 1998) at 33A.

"Don't Confuse Remedies and Penalties." Newsday (Dec. 18, 1998) at A73.

"The Approaching Constitutional Crisis." The Chicago Tribune (June 5, 1998) at A13.

"Bill of Attainder." Los Angeles Times (Feb. 26, 1996) at B4.

"One American at a Time: Legislating by Bill of Attainder." Legal Times (Feb. 26, 1996) at 29.

"Federalizing a Custody Case." The Washington Post (Feb. 10, 1996) at A22.

"Legislating Values for One Family at a Time." Washington Times (Mar. 26, 1996) at A15.

"A Model Senator: When Does Corporate Publicity Become Political Contribution?" Legal Times (Apr. 18, 1996) at 24.

"Black Bag Justice." Legal Times (Nov. 21, 1994) at 28.

"The Government Versus the Grand Jury." The Chicago Tribune (Sept. 23, 1993) at A11.

"A Simple Matter of Retaliation." Legal Times (Jan. 25, 1993) at 43.

"Crimes Against the Environment." Wall Street Journal (Feb. 3, 1993) at A15.

"Environmental Crime." Time (Feb. 22, 1993) at 10

"We Need to Unearth Environmental Felons." Wall Street Journal (Mar. 11, 1993) at A15.

"Free the Rocky Flats 13." The Washington Post (Aug. 13, 1993) at A11.

"Environmental Law and Order: New Administration Should End Lax Enforcement of Pollution Laws." 106 The Los Angeles Daily Journal 6 (March 25, 1993).

"A Solution to Prison Overcrowding." USA Today Magazine (Nov. 1992) at 80.

"Why Prison Health Care is a Crime." The Chicago Tribune (Mar. 19, 1991) at A19.

"Our Prison Profiteers." New York Times (Aug. 3, 1990) at A20.

"Solving Prison Overcrowding - Prisons aren't Nursing Homes." New York Times (Oct. 9, 1989) at A17.

"Global Dinosaurs: Charting the Rise and Fall of Great Powers." The Chicago Tribune (May 8, 1988) at 5, 9.

[Median Democrat]

43. Cool. Now, based on the serious scholar work, is he a nationally recognized scholar?

Turley's books. Please. That's it. Same thing does for newspaper articles.

Here is the good stuff:

/snip

LAW REVIEW ARTICLES & CHAPTERS IN BOOKS

"Too Clever By Half: The Unconstitutionality of Partial Respresentation of the District of Columbia in Congress," 76 The George Washington Law Review 305-374 (2008).


(With Vitiello, Michael; Clark Kelso; Erwin Chemerinsky; Kevin R. Reitz; & Franklin E. Zimring). ""A Proposal for a Wholesale Reform of California's Sentencing Practice and Policy."" 38 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 9-3-966 (2004).


"Unpacking the Court: The Case for the Expansion of the United States Supreme Court in the Twenty-First Century." 33 Perspectives on Political Science, no. 3, p. 155 (June 22, 2004).


"Pax Militaris: The Feres Doctrine and the Retention of Sovereign Immunity in the Military System of Governance." 71 George Washington Law Review 1-90 (2003).


"Presidential Papers and Popular Government: The Convergence of Constitutional and Property Theory in Claims of Ownership and Control of Presidential Records." 88 Cornell Law Review 651-732 (2003).


"The Military Pocket Republic." 97 Northwestern University Law Review 1-133 (2002).


"Tribunals and Tribulations: The Antithetical Elements of Military Governance in a Madisonian Democracy." 70 George Washington Law Review 649-768 (2002).


"Paradise Lost: The Clinton Administration and the Erosion of Executive Privilege." 60 Maryland Law Review 205-248 (2001).


"The Constitutional Guild: The Problem with Banality in Constitutional Law." 96 Northwestern University Law Review 335-338 (2001).


"A Crisis of Faith: Tobacco and the Madisonian Democracy." 37 Harvard Journal on Legislation 433-481 (2000).


"From Pillar to Post: The Prosecution of American Presidents." 37 American Criminal Law Review 1049-1106 (2000).


"Hold Government Accountable for its Environmental Misconduct." 15 Legal Backgrounder, no. 50 (Oct. 20, 2000).

Reprinted in 21 Hazardous Waste Litigation Reporter, no. 6, p. 16 (Feb. 2, 2001).

"Through a Looking Glass Darkly: National Security and Statutory Interpretation." 53 SMU Law Review 205-249 (2000).


"Transformative Justice and the Ethos of Nuremberg." 33 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 655-680 (2000).


"Congress as Grand Jury: The Role of the House of Representatives in the Impeachment of an American President." 67 George Washington Law Review 735-790 (1999).


"Reflections on Murder, Misdemeanors, and Madison." 28 Hofstra Law Review 439-471 (1999).


"Senate Trials and Factional Disputes: Impeachment as a Madisonian Device." 49 Duke Law Journal 1-146 (1999).


"The Executive Function Theory, the Hamilton Affair, and other Constitutional Mythologies." 77 North Carolina Law Review 1791-1866 (1999).


"Part I: Liberty, Property, and Environmental Ethics." (Panel Discussion: Federalist Society Symposium: The Environment and the Law). 21 Ecology Law Quarterly 387-429 (1994).


"Preserve the Group's Consensus." (The Forum: Sentencing Corporate Polluters). 11 The Environmental Forum 43-44 (Apr. 1994).


"Dualistic Values in the Age of International Legisprudence." 44 Hastings Law Journal 185-272 (1993).


"Transnational Discrimination and the Economics of Extraterritorial Regulation." 70 Boston University Law Review 339-393 (1990).


"'When in Rome': Multinational Misconduct and the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality." 84 Northwestern University Law Review 598-664 (1990).


"Laying Hands on Religious Racketeers: Applying Civil RICO to Fraudulent Religious Solicitations." 29 William and Mary Law Review 441-500 (1988)


"The Not-So-Noble Lie: The Nonincorporation of State Consensual Surveillance Standards in Federal Court." 79 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 66-134 (1988).


"The RICO Lottery and the Gains Multiplication Approach: An Alternative Measurement of Damages under Civil RICO." 33 Villanova Law Review 239-280 (1988).


"Introduction: The Hitchhiker's Guide to CLS, Unger, and Deep Thought." 81 Northwestern University Law Review 593-620 (1987).


"United States v. McNulty: Title III and the Admissibility in Federal Court of Illegally Gathered State Evidence." 80 Northwestern University Law Review 1714-1752 (1986).

/snip

Now, based on the above, do you think he is a nationally recognized scholar on constitutional law?

[hlthe2b]

46. Well, he is considered so by the #2 ranked law school in US

[Median Democrat]

5. Jonathan Turley - Testifying In Favor Of Bill Clinton's Impeachment. Agree?

I have never commented on Turley, because he has always struck me as a bit of a loon. I am asking what exactly makes him such an expert? Did he win a nobel prize or authored textbooks like Paul Krugman?

Here is his testimony on Bill Clinton regarding why Bill Clinton committed "high crimes". You be the judge.

I am just saying that we should be careful about accepting Turley's statements as the gospel truth. Turley gets air time because he say outrageous shit.

http://jonathanturley.org/2007/08/20/clinton-impeachment-testimony-house-judiciary-committee/

[CreekDog]

6. Turley is just getting a critical look

in fact less critical than Obama gets around here.

[Median Democrat]

11. Exactly. Otherwise, We Sound Like Republicans Quoting Jerome Corsi.

Why does Turley get a free pass? What is Turley's qualifications? There are thousands of law professors in the U.S. Turley just happens to be media friendly and say sensational shit.

[leftstreet]

We're gonna need a bigger bus n/t

[mwei924]

10. No, it's cause he's nutty.

According to him, every President should've been impeached.

[billyoc]

42. Yes. Olbermann and Maddow will be joining him under the bus as well.

And you, now, of course. :hi:

[Supersedeas]

56. lest you dissent with the pom-poms

[QC]

51. Yes, it's his turn under the Hopemobile.

It's happened to every other good Democrat and/or progressive, so why not Turley?

[montanacowboy]

3. Oh Please

If Obama does not investigate the crimes of the Bush's and he continues to think this country is one of men and not laws, Turley is right on the mark.

If Obama does not pursue this, he will be a one term president

[Median Democrat]

9. So, Your Point Is That Turley's Qualifications Are Political, Not Legal?

What are Turley's qualifications? He is no Paul Krugman.

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

17. Paul Krugman isn't even "Paul Krugman"

Which is to say, all the credentials in the world don't exactly mean you can't also be a nut or that you're beyond being wrong.

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

15. There is absolutely no truth to your last statement.

Of the polls conducted on the topic, the outcomes basically wind up matching the biases of the polling firm - meaning there's really no conclusive evidence on what the people really want.

The absolute truth of the matter is that as long as the economy improves, Obama could almost literally eat a live baby and win re-election. And everyone, including Obama himself, knows it.

[monmouth]

4. I'd like Keith to get another opinion other than Turley's.....n/t

[The Magistrate]

7. Pretty Much, Sir, Yes....

He came to prominence cheer-leading for the Republican attempt at coup by impeachment against President Clinton, and makes the common mistake of confusing notoriety with fame....

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

8. I can't speak to his background, however...

When the same guy argues vociferously on behalf of impeaching each of the last three presidents, one of whom is less than 100 days into his term, it'd be irresponsible not to at least question his motives and/or sanity.

[stopbush]

13. I'm guessing that everyone here would need to do a Goggle search to answer

your question about Turley's credentials.

Here's a thought: how about YOU do the search and get back to the rest of us?

[hlthe2b]

22. re:

:thumbsup:

[Median Democrat]

27. Google And Find The Self-Described "Scholar" Has Written No Books

Maybe you will have better luck with google, but I tried checking for books written by this self-described scholar. Nuthin.

[hlthe2b]

30. Even if you go no further than Wikipedia....

I don't do medical journal searches on google, nor would I expect to find legal journal articles from a mere google search. I don't have access to a law library or legal search engine. But, if you REALLY wanted to find out what he'd published, I suggest doing so.


Career

Some of Turley’s most notable non-academic work is his representation of the Area 51 workers at a secret air base in Nevada; the nuclear couriers at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Rocky Flats grand jury in Colorado; Dr. Eric Foretich, the husband in the famous Elizabeth Morgan custody controversy.<3> He challenged Black Bag Operations authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in espionage cases against former CIA officer Harold Nicholson; and four former United States Attorneys General during the Clinton impeachment litigation. He has also represented defendants in terrorism cases including Dr. Ali Al-Timimi (the alleged head of the Virginia Jihad/Paintball conspiracy) and Dr. Sami Al-Arian (in a criminal contempt case)<4>. He also represented Larry Hanauer, a House Intelligence Committee staff member falsely accused of leaking classified information to the New York Times and David Faulk, a whistleblower who revealed abuses at NSA's Fort Gordon surveillance programs. He is also lead counsel in the litigation over the mass arrests at the World Bank/IMF protests in Washington. He testified on the Clinton impeachment as one of the constitutional experts on the standards and merits of the case. The conceptual thread running through many of the cases taken on by Turley is that they involve claims of Executive Privilege and national security exceptions to fundamental constitutional rights.

He is a frequent witness before the House and Senate on constitutional and statutory issues as well as tort reform legislation. He lives in D.C. with his wife Leslie. He served as the consultant to the Florida House of Representatives on constitutional issues and also served as the consultant to the Puerto Rico House of Representatives on the impeachment of Gov. Aníbal Acevedo Vilá. Professor Turley is also a nationally recognized legal commentator. Turley was ranked as 38th in the top 100 most cited “public intellectuals” in the recent study by Judge Richard Posner. Turley was found to be the second most cited law professor in the country. He was also ranked among the nation's top 500 lawyers in 2008. (He was previously ranked in the top ten military lawyers as well as one of the forty top lawyers under the age of forty).

His articles on legal and policy issues appear regularly in national publications with over 500 articles in such newspapers as the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal. He is on the Board of Contributors of USA Today. In 2005, Turley was given the Columnist of the Year award for Single-Issue Advocacy for his columns on civil liberties by the Aspen Institute and the Week Magazine. Professor Turley also appears regularly as a legal expert on all of the major television networks. Since the 1990s, he has worked under contract as the on-air Legal Analyst for NBC News and CBS News to cover stories that ranged from the Clinton impeachment to the presidential elections. Professor Turley is often a guest on Sunday talk shows with over two-dozen appearances on Meet the Press, ABC This Week, Face the Nation, and Fox Sunday.

Prior to joining the George Washington University, he was one of the youngest professors to be offered tenure at Tulane University Law School. Turley teaches torts, criminal procedure and environmental law and runs the Project for Older Prisoners (POPS), the Environmental Law Clinic and the Environmental Legislation Project.<5> In the classroom, he is known for his self-deprecating humor, playing practical jokes on his students, and for his engaging teaching style in which he uses entertaining stories drawn from his real-world experiences.

Turley received his bachelor's degree from the University of Chicago and his law degree from Northwestern University School of Law. In 2008, he was also awarded a Doctorate of Law (Hon.) from John Marshall Law School in recognition of his career as an advocate of civil liberties and constitutional rights.

Turley, in his capacity as a constitutional scholar, testified in favor of the Clinton impeachment.<6> In October 2006, in an interview by Keith Olbermann of MSNBC, he expressed strong disapproval of the Military Commissions Act of 2006.<7> In numerous appearances on Countdown and The Rachel Maddow Show, he has called for criminal prosecution of Bush administration officials for alleged war crimes, namely torture.

Jonathan Turley was a House page from 1977 to 1978. His blog is found at www.jonathanturley.org, which was recently ranked as the top law professor blog and legal theory blog in the American Bar Association Journal's survey of the top 100 blogs.

Notes

1. ^ Prof. Turley’s Faculty Profile
2. ^ Terri Schiavo and How Temptation Can Top the Constitution August 20, 2007
3. ^ Elizabeth Morgan Act and Legislating Family Values November 20, 2007
4. ^ http://www.freesamialarian.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=9:dr-al-arians-attorneys&Itemid=6&layout=default
5. ^ "Law School community commitments". http://www.gwu.edu/~ccommit/law.htm. Retrieved on 2007-07-27.
6. ^ The Worst Congress Ever: How our national legislature has become a stable of thieves and perverts — in five easy steps by Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone, Oct. 17, 2006
7. ^ ‘National yawn as our rights evaporate’: New law redefines habeas corpus; law professor explains on ‘Countdown’ Keith Olbermann talks to Jonathan Turley, law professor at George Washington University, about the implications of the Military Commissions Act, Oct. 17, 2006

[Median Democrat]

38. Fluff - Books, Published Opinions, Trial Victories, Legal Articles

Turley's bio does not have anything specific. I read that bio, and where's the back-up? He says he is involed in some high profile cases. Okay, where is the trial victory or the published decision?

Is Turley suddenly modest with the specifics?

[hlthe2b]

40. Just like arguing with a freeper....

You've shown your stripes, sir

[Median Democrat]

44. Nice Ad Hominem Attack!

[hlthe2b]

48. Well, you failed to read anything I had posted nor to do your OWN

research before making such classless assertions. That is a very freeper trait, whether that describes YOU or not.

[Median Democrat]

49. Here's my question, you could have posted the link at the outset...

But you chose to attack my integrity, rather than respond to my question. It was pretty obvious that I had looked at his website, and his books. You cite an article list, and I have you credit for that below. Now, tell me, who is the one who is engaging in ad hominem attacks.

I do question whether he is as nationally respected as he says he is, because so much of his portfolio relies on media apperances, and he has not written any books, or have many if any published cases.

The best thing I see is his law review articles. Again, I am happy to discuss them, but if you want to attack my character, then just let me know, so I can place you on ignore.

[hlthe2b]

52. I had to take time to locate it--something YOU could have done

I find your attitude to be very detrimental to any positive discourse with you--given your penchance for baseless assertions and obviously several others here would appear to agree. I provided you with the information you sought. Whether or not you use it to inform your opinion is certainly up to you.

[jkshaw]

31. I did, Stop -- thoroughly,

and I agree with the original poster.

[ProSense]

14. Turley has a point, and he

isn't saying anything different from what most people who want war crimes prosecuted are saying.

There is no debate about whether or not Bush officials should be prosecuted, most people agree.

As for claiming that Obama is breaking the law, Glen Greenwald offers some perspective.

People really should focus on ensuring that Bush officials are prosecuted. I can't imagine anyone who wouldn't see this as justice served.

[Median Democrat]

54. I Agree, And I Think Its Cool To Discuss Those Issues, But...

I always scratch my head at citations to an individual, as the mere reference to that individual carries the day. Its like Republicans with their list of 100 economists who allegedly oppose Obama's economic plan.

[atreides1]

18. Here's some information

Some of Turley’s most notable non-academic work is his representation of the Area 51 workers at a secret air base in Nevada; the nuclear couriers at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Rocky Flats grand jury in Colorado; Dr. Eric Foretich, the husband in the famous Elizabeth Morgan custody controversy. He challenged Black Bag Operations authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in espionage cases against former CIA officer Harold Nicholson; and four former United States Attorneys General during the Clinton impeachment litigation. He has also represented defendants in terrorism cases including Dr. Ali Al-Timimi (the alleged head of the Virginia Jihad/Paintball conspiracy) and Dr. Sami Al-Arian (in a criminal contempt case). He also represented Larry Hanauer, a House Intelligence Committee staff member falsely accused of leaking classified information to the New York Times and David Faulk, a whistleblower who revealed abuses at NSA's Fort Gordon surveillance programs. He is also lead counsel in the litigation over the mass arrests at the World Bank/IMF protests in Washington. He testified on the Clinton impeachment as one of the constitutional experts on the standards and merits of the case. The conceptual thread running through many of the cases taken on by Turley is that they involve claims of Executive Privilege and national security exceptions to fundamental constitutional rights.


His articles on legal and policy issues appear regularly in national publications with over 500 articles in such newspapers as the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal. He is on the Board of Contributors of USA Today. In 2005, Turley was given the Columnist of the Year award for Single-Issue Advocacy for his columns on civil liberties by the Aspen Institute and the Week Magazine. Professor Turley also appears regularly as a legal expert on all of the major television networks. Since the 1990s, he has worked under contract as the on-air Legal Analyst for NBC News and CBS News to cover stories that ranged from the Clinton impeachment to the presidential elections. Professor Turley is often a guest on Sunday talk shows with over two-dozen appearances on Meet the Press, ABC This Week, Face the Nation, and Fox Sunday.


He testified on the merits of the Clinton impeachment, not because he was in favor of it. You do understand the difference between the merits of a case and being in favor of it don't you?

merits, the inherent rights and wrongs of a matter, as a lawsuit, unobscured by procedural details, technicalities, personal feelings, etc.: The case will be decided on its merits alone.

in favor of, a. on the side of; in support of: to be in favor of reduced taxation.
b. to the advantage of.

[Median Democrat]

20. A Lot Of Fluff - Where's The Concrete Accomplishments? He's No Laurence Tribe

There is a lot of in favor of this or that. So what?

Where are:

1. Books.
2. Awards.
3. Trials won.
4. Appellate cases argued.
5. Published cases.

For example, take a look at Laurence Tribe. He is a professor of Harvard Law School who has written numerous influential books on Constitutional Law. He has also argued before the United States Supreme Court AND his students have often gone on to clerk for members of the Supreme Court.

Google Laurence Tribe, and look at his CV. This is what I am talking about.

[SoxFan]

23. Former clients?

[rateyes]

19. Even though it arose out of a stupid-assed lawsuit, Clinton did

commit a crime for which he was disbarred. I don't think, personally, that it constituted a high crime or high misdemeanor worthy of impeachment, but Turley obviously believed that it was.

Turley was right about Bush.

Turley has not YET called for Obama's impeachment. IMO, if Obama doesn't prosecute those who committed war crimes by authorizing torture, he will have broken his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the US, which states that ALL treaties are considered part of the the "supreme law of the land."

The Convention Against Torture, is a treaty to which the US is a signatory party. The Bush Administration tortured, and authorized torture. NOT to prosecute that crime is a crime against the Constitution itself. President Obama should either make sure the crimes are prosecuted, or, if he feels so strongly about not prosecuting, should immediately issue presidential pardons to all involved. Those are the only Constititutional options he has. To refuse to prosecute is breaking the law.

[grahamhgreen]

26. You, sir, are a one trick pony - a clever non-issue, no fact, ranting fool.

[Median Democrat]

33. See for yourself - What published cases was Jonathan Turley counsel on?

I haven't found any on google. Turley says that he was counsel on important issues. Okay. Where are the published cases?

[hlthe2b]

36. Here.... If you can read, that is....

TURLEY, JONATHAN


BOOKS

A Guide to Citizen Law Enforcement: Fighting Environmental Crime at Facilities of the U.S. Department of Energy and Defense. Santa Barbara, CA: Project for Participatory Democracy, 1996.


POPS, Project for Older Prisoners: A Report to the State of New York. New York: Project for Older Prisoners, 1996.


Preliminary Report on Criminal Environmental Prosecution by the United States Department of Justice. Washington, DC: The Environmental Crimes Project, National Law Center, The George Washington University, 1992.



LAW REVIEW ARTICLES & CHAPTERS IN BOOKS

"Too Clever By Half: The Unconstitutionality of Partial Respresentation of the District of Columbia in Congress," 76 The George Washington Law Review 305-374 (2008).


(With Vitiello, Michael; Clark Kelso; Erwin Chemerinsky; Kevin R. Reitz; & Franklin E. Zimring). ""A Proposal for a Wholesale Reform of California's Sentencing Practice and Policy."" 38 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 9-3-966 (2004).


"Unpacking the Court: The Case for the Expansion of the United States Supreme Court in the Twenty-First Century." 33 Perspectives on Political Science, no. 3, p. 155 (June 22, 2004).


"Pax Militaris: The Feres Doctrine and the Retention of Sovereign Immunity in the Military System of Governance." 71 George Washington Law Review 1-90 (2003).


"Presidential Papers and Popular Government: The Convergence of Constitutional and Property Theory in Claims of Ownership and Control of Presidential Records." 88 Cornell Law Review 651-732 (2003).


"The Military Pocket Republic." 97 Northwestern University Law Review 1-133 (2002).


"Tribunals and Tribulations: The Antithetical Elements of Military Governance in a Madisonian Democracy." 70 George Washington Law Review 649-768 (2002).


"Paradise Lost: The Clinton Administration and the Erosion of Executive Privilege." 60 Maryland Law Review 205-248 (2001).


"The Constitutional Guild: The Problem with Banality in Constitutional Law." 96 Northwestern University Law Review 335-338 (2001).


"A Crisis of Faith: Tobacco and the Madisonian Democracy." 37 Harvard Journal on Legislation 433-481 (2000).


"From Pillar to Post: The Prosecution of American Presidents." 37 American Criminal Law Review 1049-1106 (2000).


"Hold Government Accountable for its Environmental Misconduct." 15 Legal Backgrounder, no. 50 (Oct. 20, 2000).

Reprinted in 21 Hazardous Waste Litigation Reporter, no. 6, p. 16 (Feb. 2, 2001).

"Through a Looking Glass Darkly: National Security and Statutory Interpretation." 53 SMU Law Review 205-249 (2000).


"Transformative Justice and the Ethos of Nuremberg." 33 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 655-680 (2000).


"Congress as Grand Jury: The Role of the House of Representatives in the Impeachment of an American President." 67 George Washington Law Review 735-790 (1999).


"Reflections on Murder, Misdemeanors, and Madison." 28 Hofstra Law Review 439-471 (1999).


"Senate Trials and Factional Disputes: Impeachment as a Madisonian Device." 49 Duke Law Journal 1-146 (1999).


"The Executive Function Theory, the Hamilton Affair, and other Constitutional Mythologies." 77 North Carolina Law Review 1791-1866 (1999).


"Part I: Liberty, Property, and Environmental Ethics." (Panel Discussion: Federalist Society Symposium: The Environment and the Law). 21 Ecology Law Quarterly 387-429 (1994).


"Preserve the Group's Consensus." (The Forum: Sentencing Corporate Polluters). 11 The Environmental Forum 43-44 (Apr. 1994).


"Dualistic Values in the Age of International Legisprudence." 44 Hastings Law Journal 185-272 (1993).


"Transnational Discrimination and the Economics of Extraterritorial Regulation." 70 Boston University Law Review 339-393 (1990).


"'When in Rome': Multinational Misconduct and the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality." 84 Northwestern University Law Review 598-664 (1990).


"Laying Hands on Religious Racketeers: Applying Civil RICO to Fraudulent Religious Solicitations." 29 William and Mary Law Review 441-500 (1988)


"The Not-So-Noble Lie: The Nonincorporation of State Consensual Surveillance Standards in Federal Court." 79 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 66-134 (1988).


"The RICO Lottery and the Gains Multiplication Approach: An Alternative Measurement of Damages under Civil RICO." 33 Villanova Law Review 239-280 (1988).


"Introduction: The Hitchhiker's Guide to CLS, Unger, and Deep Thought." 81 Northwestern University Law Review 593-620 (1987).


"United States v. McNulty: Title III and the Admissibility in Federal Court of Illegally Gathered State Evidence." 80 Northwestern University Law Review 1714-1752 (1986).



OTHER

"The Door to Room 204." USA Today p. 11A (Apr. 25, 2007).

"The Truth About Oaths." USA Today p. 9A (Jan. 4, 2007).

"Can Congress Stop the War?" USA Today p. 13A (Jan. 18, 2007).

"The Fight Over D.C.; Too Clever by Half: The Unconstitutional D.C. Voting Rights Bill." Roll Call (Jan. 25, 1007).

"War - What is it Good For?" USA Today p. 11A (Feb. 15, 2007).

"My Boys Like Shootouts. What's Wrong With That?" The Washington Post p. B01 (Feb. 25, 2007).

"Justice? What a Joke." USA Today p. 21A (Mar. 27, 2007).

"Equal Rights Redux: The Three-State Solution." Los Angeles Times p. M3 (Apr. 8, 2007).

"Feres Follies." USA Today p. 13A (Apr. 12, 2007).

"The Revival of the Equal Rights Amendment." Roll Call (Apr. 16, 2007).

"The Land of $9 Million: Anyone Can Run for Public Office, Right?" USA Today p. 13A (May 16, 2007).

"Jefferson Deserves Presumption of Innovence." Roll Call (June 7, 2007).

"The History of Oaths." USA Today p. 9A (Jan. 4, 2007).

"What Our Soldiers Really Need: Lawyers." USA Today p. 13A (Apr. 12, 2007).

"When Law Schools Take the Low Road." New Jersey Law Journal (Jan. 16, 2006).

"It's Not Black and White." USA Today p. 21A (Dec. 6, 2006).

"Our Loquacious Justices." Los Angeles Times (Mar. 28, 2006) at B13.

"The Buck (Fever) Stops Here: Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety." The Washington Post p. B04 (Feb 19, 2006).

"Troubling Times: A Troubling Nominee: Why Alito's Deference to the Powerful Should Worry You--Especially Today." USA Today p. 13A (Jan 10, 2006).

"Tackling a Judge's Ideology: Alito Appears to be the Bob Newhart of Judging, Delivering Deadpan Decisions That Make Him Difficult to Lionize or Demonize." Chicago Tribune p. C9 (Jan. 8, 2006).

"Eight Simple Steps to a Swiffer Congress." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Jan. 5, 2006).

"'Big Brother' Bush and Connecting the Data Dots." Los Angeles Times p. B15 (June 24, 2006).

"Issue of Hypocrisy." 27 National Law Journal no. 68, p. 23 (Jan. 9, 2006).

"How to End the Same-Sex Marriage Debate." USA Today p. 15A (Apr. 3, 2006).

"Living in a City of Spies." The Baltimore Sun p. 15A (May 3, 2006).

"Down to the Fourth Estate." USA Today p. 11A (May 17, 2006).

"Lap Dances, Wills and You: Anna Nicole Smith Gets Her Day in Court Today." USA Today p. 13A (Feb. 28, 2006).

"A Question of Ethics." USA Today p. 13A (Nov. 14, 2006).

"Constitutional Swag." Roll Call (June 19, 2006).

"Gen. Hayden Earns His 'Bones' and a Nomination." Chicago Tribune p. C27 (May 10, 2006).

"Well-Paved Road to Political Perdition." Chicago Tribune p. C7 (June 25, 2006).

"The Case for Macroscopic Humans." USA Today p. 13A (July 18, 2006).

"A War With Flags But No Faces." USA Today p. 11A (Aug. 17, 2006).

"NSA Ruling Much Like a Pig in Parlor." Chicago Tribune p. C5 (Aug. 20, 2006).

"Why Race-Based 'Survivor' Makes Us Squirm." USA Today p. 13A (Sept. 14, 2006).

"Give the Dead Their Due." The Washington Post p. B01 (Sept. 17, 2006).

"Get Congress Out of the Page Business." New York Times p. 31A (Oct. 4, 2006).

"The Roberts Court: Seeing is Believing." USA Today p. 11A (July 6, 2006).

"Insanity's Legal Fall from Grace." USA Today p. 13A (May 30, 2006).

"A Page Protection Act: The Path to Saving a History Program." Roll Call (Oct. 5, 2006).

"An 'Old' Prison Solution." Los Angeles Times p. B17 (Oct. 7, 2006).

"109th Congress Just Can't Resist." USA Today p. 13A (Oct. 19, 2006).

"The Nomination of John Roberts. It's Time to be Afraid, Very Afraid." Chicago Tribune p. C9 (July 24, 2005).

"A Right Turn on the High Court?" USA Today p. 13A (June 27, 2005).

"Candidates for the Supreme Court: Judging the Short List." USA Today p. 13A (June 27, 2005).

"So What's the Story on Bob Novak? His Decision to Play It Cagey in the Plame Case is Helping No One." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (July 1, 2005).

"To Improve the Supreme Court, Let's Expand It." Roll Call (July 19, 2005).

"Democrats' Disarray Muddies Court Fight." The Baltimore Sun p. 21A (July 14, 2005).

"Michael, Meet Fatty. And Errol and Martha and . . ." The Washington Post p. B01 (June 19, 2005).

"Military Scapegoats Walk a Well-Worn Path." USA Today p. 13A (June 7, 2005).

"When is Violent Speech Still Free Speech?" USA Today p. 13A (May 3, 2005).

"The Not So Dirty Dozen: They're the Undercard to the Fight Over a High Court Nomination." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Apr. 18, 2005).

"Dissing the Dead to Save the Accused: Blake Lawyers Used an Old Technique." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Mar. 4, 2005).

"Estrich's Vicious Attack." The Washington Times p. A19 (Mar. 14, 2005).

"The Faith of John Roberts." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (July 25, 2005).

"Mr. Frist Goes to Washington." U.S.A. Today p. 15A (Apr. 7, 2005).

"What Qualifies One for the Supreme Court?" USA Today p. 13A (Oct. 6, 2005).

"Temptation Tops the Constitution." U.S.A. Today p. 13A (Mar. 23, 2005).

"Bob Woodward's Belated Disclosure Raises Troubling Questions." The Baltimore Sun p. 27A (Nov. 17, 2005).

"Bush and Domestic Spying: Good for America?" USA Today p. 11A (Dec. 22, 2005).

"After the Hurricanes, It's Raining Money." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Sept. 28, 2005).

"A Parent's Right to Know." USA Today p. 13A (Dec. 6, 2005).

"A Model for the Future." 27 National Law Journal no. 26, p. 27 (Aug. 1, 2005).

"The Crazy World of Insanity Law." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (Nov. 11, 2005).

"Chicago's Segregted Schools." Chicago Tribune p. C25 (Nov. 10, 2005).

"Wanted: A Redeeming Character." USA Today p. 15A (Nov. 1, 2005).

"Bork is Owed an Explanation." 27 National Law Journal no. 55, p. 30 (Oct. 3, 2005).

"Roberts the Elder." Village Voice p. 24 (Sept. 20, 2005).

"Shame on You: Enough with the Humiliating Punishments, Judges." The Washington Post p. B03 (Sept. 18, 2005).

"Role Models for Roberts." USA Today p. 23A (Sept. 12, 2005).

"Roberts: The Before and The After." USA Today p. 13A (Aug. 31, 2005).

"When Justices Won't Go." Los Angeles Times p. B19 (Aug. 13, 2005).

"Our Forgotten Citizens." 26 National Law Journal no. 63, p. 34 (Dec. 20, 2004).

"A Check on Wartime Power." 26 National Law Journal no. 75, p. 26 (Mar. 7, 2005).

"Not as Radical as All That." (Editorial on Supreme Court's decision on gay rights in Lawrence v. Texas.) 25 Legal Times no. 46, p. 31 (July 14, 2003).

" . . . 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19." (Editorial on increasing the size of the Supreme Court.) 26 Legal Times no. 32, p. 50 (Aug. 11, 2003).

"Seeing Red on Blue Slips." Los Angeles Times (May 16, 2001) at pt. 2, p.13.

"The Ghost Fleet and other Dumb Ideas." Chicago Tribune (May 20, 2001) at p. 21.

"Bush Loses Senate." Washington Times (May 29, 2001) at A15.

"Nation of Mutts in a Muddle." Los Angeles Times (July 3, 2001), at p.2, p. 13.

"Is This Beach Clean Enough? Despite Progress, Serious Environmental Risks Remain." Legal Times (May 29, 2000) at 66.

"Citizen Clinton is Not Above the Law." Newsday (Aug. 21, 2000) at A23.

"Lawyers and the Lynching." National Law Journal (Aug. 7, 2000) at A1.

"Selective Prosecution: Don't Confuse Charles Bakaly with Bill Clinton." Washington Times (July 24, 2000) at A19.

"Telling What Wasn't Secret." New York Times (July 17, 2000) at A19.

"Ray is Damned if He Does or if He Doesn't." Los Angeles Times (Aug. 22, 2000) at B9.

"Court Strikes Health Balance on HMO's." Wall Street Journal (June 13, 2000) at A26.

"Of Boy Scouts and Bigots." Chicago Tribune (June 30, 2000) at 27.

"Clinton Fully Merits Being Disbarred." Newsday (May 25, 2000) at A51.

"Navy Undermines Client Privilege." National Law Journal (Apr. 3, 2000) at A22.

"A Bad Canadian Heads South." Wall Street Journal (Feb. 28, 2000) at A41.

"The Mouse that Roared - and Voted." Los Angeles Times (Jan. 17, 2000) at B5.

"'Miranda' - Confirmed but Barely Alive." Washington Post (June 27, 2000) at A23.

"History Shows Ballot Fights can Wound President." USA Today (Nov. 13, 2000) at 31A.

"Vote of Congress May Offer Real Political Closure." USA Today (Nov. 22, 2000) at 29A.

"Presidential Transition in Amber." USA Today (Dec. 5, 2000) at 17A.

"The Scariest Part may be Yet to Come." Los Angeles Times (Dec. 8, 2000) at B9.

"Perspective on Justice." Los Angeles Times (June 19, 2000) at B7.

"A Farewell to Sid Yates." Chicago Tribune (Oct. 10, 2000) at p. 15.

"The Trial Lawyer of the Century." Legal Times (Nov. 29, 1999) at 50.

"Senators Prefer Politics to their Roles as Jurors." National Law Journal (Jan. 25, 1999) at A27.

"What's Wrong with Wright." Wall Street Journal (Apr. 19, 1999) at A22.

"A Verdict in a Land of No Absolutes." Newsday (Feb. 15, 1999) at A29.

"Bad Timing on Contempt Ruling." Wall Street Journal (May 4, 1999) at A23.

"The Right Verdict? It's All Relative." Los Angeles Times (Feb. 12, 1999) at A7.

"Pulp Justice." Los Angeles Times (May 5, 1999) at A7.

"Could this Case be the End of TV Talk Show Traps?" USA Today (May 13, 1999) at 15A.

"Trial and Error." 51 National Review 22 (Feb. 8, 1999).

"Talk Show Tort Wars Ahead." National Law Journal (June 7, 1999) at A29.

"You Don't Impeach a Chief Executive Officer." National Law Journal (Mar. 1, 1999) at A22.

"The New Profiteers of the Tobacco War." Wall Street Journal (Sept. 20, 1999) at A29.

"The Trial of the Century." Legal Times (Sept. 27, 1999) at 27.

"Reforming the Great American Litigation Lottery." Chicago Tribune (Oct. 31, 1999) at A19.

"Madison Felled by Tobacco?" National Law Journal (Dec. 13, 1999) at A28.

"Last Rites for the Independent Counsel Act." The Chicago Tribune (June 30, 1999) at A21.

"Nothing Bars Questioning President's Bad Ideas." Los Angeles Times (Sept. 27, 1999) at B7.

"The President Resorts to Jury Nullification." Wall Street Journal (Dec. 15, 1998) at A22.

"Clinton's Nullification Strategy of Last Resort." National Law Journal (July 13, 1998) at A19.

"Guarding the King, Not his Secrets." Legal Times (Feb. 2, 1998) at 28.

"Clinton Maneuvers Threaten his Office." National Law Journal (Feb. 23, 1998) at A19.

"Grand Jury as Grand Opera." Legal Times (Feb. 23, 1998) at 31.

"The Paula Jones Case Under a Suppression Strategy." Los Angeles Times (Apr. 3, 1998) at A11.

"The Jones Case: Too Fast on the Escape." Newsday (Apr. 7, 1998) at A43.

"The President and the Damage Done." Legal Times (Apr. 20, 1998) at 24.

"Praetorian Privilege." Wall Street Journal (Apr. 27, 1998) at A23.

"The Trouble with Hubble." The Chicago Tribune (May 3, 1998) at A11.

"Call Clinton to Grand Jury." National Law Journal (May 4, 1998) at A21.

"How We Try Our Leaders." Legal Times (Dec. 21, 1998) at 39.

"Why Clinton Wants to be Impeached." Wall Street Journal (July 6, 1998) at A15.

"Without Testimony or a Trial, Censure is Harmless Precedent." USA Today (Dec. 23, 1998) at 13A.

"Hashing Out Ockham's Razor over Eggs." The Chicago Tribune (July 13, 1998) at A11.

"Witness for the Prosecution." The Chicago Tribune (Aug. 30, 1998) at 19.

"A Little Bit Impeached." Legal Times (Sept. 7, 1998) at 25.

"Perjury is not Politics." Wall Street Journal (Sept. 14, 1998) at A23.

"Impeachment." USA Today (Sept. 14, 1998) at 10A.

"The New Originalists." Legal Times (Oct. 19, 1998) at 27.

"High Crimes and Misdemeanors, According to the Framers." Wall Street Journal (Nov. 9, 1998) at A15.

"Checking the Executive Pulse." Los Angeles Times (Nov. 19, 1998) at A11.

"Is He Too Popular to Impeach?" Los Angeles Times (Dec. 9, 1998) at A15.

"Why the President Must be Impeached." The Baltimore Sun (Dec. 11, 1998) at 33A.

"Don't Confuse Remedies and Penalties." Newsday (Dec. 18, 1998) at A73.

"The Approaching Constitutional Crisis." The Chicago Tribune (June 5, 1998) at A13.

"Bill of Attainder." Los Angeles Times (Feb. 26, 1996) at B4.

"One American at a Time: Legislating by Bill of Attainder." Legal Times (Feb. 26, 1996) at 29.

"Federalizing a Custody Case." The Washington Post (Feb. 10, 1996) at A22.

"Legislating Values for One Family at a Time." Washington Times (Mar. 26, 1996) at A15.

"A Model Senator: When Does Corporate Publicity Become Political Contribution?" Legal Times (Apr. 18, 1996) at 24.

"Black Bag Justice." Legal Times (Nov. 21, 1994) at 28.

"The Government Versus the Grand Jury." The Chicago Tribune (Sept. 23, 1993) at A11.

"A Simple Matter of Retaliation." Legal Times (Jan. 25, 1993) at 43.

"Crimes Against the Environment." Wall Street Journal (Feb. 3, 1993) at A15.

"Environmental Crime." Time (Feb. 22, 1993) at 10

"We Need to Unearth Environmental Felons." Wall Street Journal (Mar. 11, 1993) at A15.

"Free the Rocky Flats 13." The Washington Post (Aug. 13, 1993) at A11.

"Environmental Law and Order: New Administration Should End Lax Enforcement of Pollution Laws." 106 The Los Angeles Daily Journal 6 (March 25, 1993).

"A Solution to Prison Overcrowding." USA Today Magazine (Nov. 1992) at 80.

"Why Prison Health Care is a Crime." The Chicago Tribune (Mar. 19, 1991) at A19.

"Our Prison Profiteers." New York Times (Aug. 3, 1990) at A20.

"Solving Prison Overcrowding - Prisons aren't Nursing Homes." New York Times (Oct. 9, 1989) at A17.

"Global Dinosaurs: Charting the Rise and Fall of Great Powers." The Chicago Tribune (May 8, 1988) at 5, 9.

[Median Democrat]

41. Thanks You! Finally, Someone Answers My Question!

Of those cites, I believe this is serious legal work:

/snip

LAW REVIEW ARTICLES & CHAPTERS IN BOOKS

"Too Clever By Half: The Unconstitutionality of Partial Respresentation of the District of Columbia in Congress," 76 The George Washington Law Review 305-374 (2008).


(With Vitiello, Michael; Clark Kelso; Erwin Chemerinsky; Kevin R. Reitz; & Franklin E. Zimring). ""A Proposal for a Wholesale Reform of California's Sentencing Practice and Policy."" 38 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 9-3-966 (2004).


"Unpacking the Court: The Case for the Expansion of the United States Supreme Court in the Twenty-First Century." 33 Perspectives on Political Science, no. 3, p. 155 (June 22, 2004).


"Pax Militaris: The Feres Doctrine and the Retention of Sovereign Immunity in the Military System of Governance." 71 George Washington Law Review 1-90 (2003).


"Presidential Papers and Popular Government: The Convergence of Constitutional and Property Theory in Claims of Ownership and Control of Presidential Records." 88 Cornell Law Review 651-732 (2003).


"The Military Pocket Republic." 97 Northwestern University Law Review 1-133 (2002).


"Tribunals and Tribulations: The Antithetical Elements of Military Governance in a Madisonian Democracy." 70 George Washington Law Review 649-768 (2002).


"Paradise Lost: The Clinton Administration and the Erosion of Executive Privilege." 60 Maryland Law Review 205-248 (2001).


"The Constitutional Guild: The Problem with Banality in Constitutional Law." 96 Northwestern University Law Review 335-338 (2001).


"A Crisis of Faith: Tobacco and the Madisonian Democracy." 37 Harvard Journal on Legislation 433-481 (2000).


"From Pillar to Post: The Prosecution of American Presidents." 37 American Criminal Law Review 1049-1106 (2000).


"Hold Government Accountable for its Environmental Misconduct." 15 Legal Backgrounder, no. 50 (Oct. 20, 2000).

Reprinted in 21 Hazardous Waste Litigation Reporter, no. 6, p. 16 (Feb. 2, 2001).

"Through a Looking Glass Darkly: National Security and Statutory Interpretation." 53 SMU Law Review 205-249 (2000).


"Transformative Justice and the Ethos of Nuremberg." 33 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 655-680 (2000).


"Congress as Grand Jury: The Role of the House of Representatives in the Impeachment of an American President." 67 George Washington Law Review 735-790 (1999).


"Reflections on Murder, Misdemeanors, and Madison." 28 Hofstra Law Review 439-471 (1999).


"Senate Trials and Factional Disputes: Impeachment as a Madisonian Device." 49 Duke Law Journal 1-146 (1999).


"The Executive Function Theory, the Hamilton Affair, and other Constitutional Mythologies." 77 North Carolina Law Review 1791-1866 (1999).


"Part I: Liberty, Property, and Environmental Ethics." (Panel Discussion: Federalist Society Symposium: The Environment and the Law). 21 Ecology Law Quarterly 387-429 (1994).


"Preserve the Group's Consensus." (The Forum: Sentencing Corporate Polluters). 11 The Environmental Forum 43-44 (Apr. 1994).


"Dualistic Values in the Age of International Legisprudence." 44 Hastings Law Journal 185-272 (1993).


"Transnational Discrimination and the Economics of Extraterritorial Regulation." 70 Boston University Law Review 339-393 (1990).


"'When in Rome': Multinational Misconduct and the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality." 84 Northwestern University Law Review 598-664 (1990).


"Laying Hands on Religious Racketeers: Applying Civil RICO to Fraudulent Religious Solicitations." 29 William and Mary Law Review 441-500 (1988)


"The Not-So-Noble Lie: The Nonincorporation of State Consensual Surveillance Standards in Federal Court." 79 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 66-134 (1988).


"The RICO Lottery and the Gains Multiplication Approach: An Alternative Measurement of Damages under Civil RICO." 33 Villanova Law Review 239-280 (1988).


"Introduction: The Hitchhiker's Guide to CLS, Unger, and Deep Thought." 81 Northwestern University Law Review 593-620 (1987).


"United States v. McNulty: Title III and the Admissibility in Federal Court of Illegally Gathered State Evidence." 80 Northwestern University Law Review 1714-1752 (1986).

/snip

The rest are just random news paper articles. Big woop on those.

[Name removed]

28. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Name removed]

37. Deleted sub-thread

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Median Democrat]

45. Nice Ad Hominem Attack!

[WeDidIt]

47. After reading this, I may have to revisit my opinion of Krugman

Turley is a very respected consittutional scholar.

[Median Democrat]

50. Really, I Actually Do Enjoy Reading Krugman's Work. What's Wrong With Krugman?

I know that he pushed the envelope, but he does have a solid academic background, as well as a practical background. The nobel prize does not hurt either.

[hlthe2b]

53. FOR Others coming late to thread: Turley's Bibliography below

The OP's assertions that Jonathan Turley has no important publications is bunk.


From the Georgetown University Law School's website:

http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.aspx?id=1738#


TURLEY, JONATHAN


BOOKS

A Guide to Citizen Law Enforcement: Fighting Environmental Crime at Facilities of the U.S. Department of Energy and Defense. Santa Barbara, CA: Project for Participatory Democracy, 1996.


POPS, Project for Older Prisoners: A Report to the State of New York. New York: Project for Older Prisoners, 1996.


Preliminary Report on Criminal Environmental Prosecution by the United States Department of Justice. Washington, DC: The Environmental Crimes Project, National Law Center, The George Washington University, 1992.



LAW REVIEW ARTICLES & CHAPTERS IN BOOKS

"Too Clever By Half: The Unconstitutionality of Partial Respresentation of the District of Columbia in Congress," 76 The George Washington Law Review 305-374 (2008).


(With Vitiello, Michael; Clark Kelso; Erwin Chemerinsky; Kevin R. Reitz; & Franklin E. Zimring). ""A Proposal for a Wholesale Reform of California's Sentencing Practice and Policy."" 38 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 9-3-966 (2004).


"Unpacking the Court: The Case for the Expansion of the United States Supreme Court in the Twenty-First Century." 33 Perspectives on Political Science, no. 3, p. 155 (June 22, 2004).


"Pax Militaris: The Feres Doctrine and the Retention of Sovereign Immunity in the Military System of Governance." 71 George Washington Law Review 1-90 (2003).


"Presidential Papers and Popular Government: The Convergence of Constitutional and Property Theory in Claims of Ownership and Control of Presidential Records." 88 Cornell Law Review 651-732 (2003).


"The Military Pocket Republic." 97 Northwestern University Law Review 1-133 (2002).


"Tribunals and Tribulations: The Antithetical Elements of Military Governance in a Madisonian Democracy." 70 George Washington Law Review 649-768 (2002).


"Paradise Lost: The Clinton Administration and the Erosion of Executive Privilege." 60 Maryland Law Review 205-248 (2001).


"The Constitutional Guild: The Problem with Banality in Constitutional Law." 96 Northwestern University Law Review 335-338 (2001).


"A Crisis of Faith: Tobacco and the Madisonian Democracy." 37 Harvard Journal on Legislation 433-481 (2000).


"From Pillar to Post: The Prosecution of American Presidents." 37 American Criminal Law Review 1049-1106 (2000).


"Hold Government Accountable for its Environmental Misconduct." 15 Legal Backgrounder, no. 50 (Oct. 20, 2000).

Reprinted in 21 Hazardous Waste Litigation Reporter, no. 6, p. 16 (Feb. 2, 2001).

"Through a Looking Glass Darkly: National Security and Statutory Interpretation." 53 SMU Law Review 205-249 (2000).


"Transformative Justice and the Ethos of Nuremberg." 33 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 655-680 (2000).


"Congress as Grand Jury: The Role of the House of Representatives in the Impeachment of an American President." 67 George Washington Law Review 735-790 (1999).


"Reflections on Murder, Misdemeanors, and Madison." 28 Hofstra Law Review 439-471 (1999).


"Senate Trials and Factional Disputes: Impeachment as a Madisonian Device." 49 Duke Law Journal 1-146 (1999).


"The Executive Function Theory, the Hamilton Affair, and other Constitutional Mythologies." 77 North Carolina Law Review 1791-1866 (1999).


"Part I: Liberty, Property, and Environmental Ethics." (Panel Discussion: Federalist Society Symposium: The Environment and the Law). 21 Ecology Law Quarterly 387-429 (1994).


"Preserve the Group's Consensus." (The Forum: Sentencing Corporate Polluters). 11 The Environmental Forum 43-44 (Apr. 1994).


"Dualistic Values in the Age of International Legisprudence." 44 Hastings Law Journal 185-272 (1993).


"Transnational Discrimination and the Economics of Extraterritorial Regulation." 70 Boston University Law Review 339-393 (1990).


"'When in Rome': Multinational Misconduct and the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality." 84 Northwestern University Law Review 598-664 (1990).


"Laying Hands on Religious Racketeers: Applying Civil RICO to Fraudulent Religious Solicitations." 29 William and Mary Law Review 441-500 (1988)


"The Not-So-Noble Lie: The Nonincorporation of State Consensual Surveillance Standards in Federal Court." 79 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 66-134 (1988).


"The RICO Lottery and the Gains Multiplication Approach: An Alternative Measurement of Damages under Civil RICO." 33 Villanova Law Review 239-280 (1988).


"Introduction: The Hitchhiker's Guide to CLS, Unger, and Deep Thought." 81 Northwestern University Law Review 593-620 (1987).


"United States v. McNulty: Title III and the Admissibility in Federal Court of Illegally Gathered State Evidence." 80 Northwestern University Law Review 1714-1752 (1986).



OTHER

"The Door to Room 204." USA Today p. 11A (Apr. 25, 2007).

"The Truth About Oaths." USA Today p. 9A (Jan. 4, 2007).

"Can Congress Stop the War?" USA Today p. 13A (Jan. 18, 2007).

"The Fight Over D.C.; Too Clever by Half: The Unconstitutional D.C. Voting Rights Bill." Roll Call (Jan. 25, 1007).

"War - What is it Good For?" USA Today p. 11A (Feb. 15, 2007).

"My Boys Like Shootouts. What's Wrong With That?" The Washington Post p. B01 (Feb. 25, 2007).

"Justice? What a Joke." USA Today p. 21A (Mar. 27, 2007).

"Equal Rights Redux: The Three-State Solution." Los Angeles Times p. M3 (Apr. 8, 2007).

"Feres Follies." USA Today p. 13A (Apr. 12, 2007).

"The Revival of the Equal Rights Amendment." Roll Call (Apr. 16, 2007).

"The Land of $9 Million: Anyone Can Run for Public Office, Right?" USA Today p. 13A (May 16, 2007).

"Jefferson Deserves Presumption of Innovence." Roll Call (June 7, 2007).

"The History of Oaths." USA Today p. 9A (Jan. 4, 2007).

"What Our Soldiers Really Need: Lawyers." USA Today p. 13A (Apr. 12, 2007).

"When Law Schools Take the Low Road." New Jersey Law Journal (Jan. 16, 2006).

"It's Not Black and White." USA Today p. 21A (Dec. 6, 2006).

"Our Loquacious Justices." Los Angeles Times (Mar. 28, 2006) at B13.

"The Buck (Fever) Stops Here: Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety, Bankety." The Washington Post p. B04 (Feb 19, 2006).

"Troubling Times: A Troubling Nominee: Why Alito's Deference to the Powerful Should Worry You--Especially Today." USA Today p. 13A (Jan 10, 2006).

"Tackling a Judge's Ideology: Alito Appears to be the Bob Newhart of Judging, Delivering Deadpan Decisions That Make Him Difficult to Lionize or Demonize." Chicago Tribune p. C9 (Jan. 8, 2006).

"Eight Simple Steps to a Swiffer Congress." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Jan. 5, 2006).

"'Big Brother' Bush and Connecting the Data Dots." Los Angeles Times p. B15 (June 24, 2006).

"Issue of Hypocrisy." 27 National Law Journal no. 68, p. 23 (Jan. 9, 2006).

"How to End the Same-Sex Marriage Debate." USA Today p. 15A (Apr. 3, 2006).

"Living in a City of Spies." The Baltimore Sun p. 15A (May 3, 2006).

"Down to the Fourth Estate." USA Today p. 11A (May 17, 2006).

"Lap Dances, Wills and You: Anna Nicole Smith Gets Her Day in Court Today." USA Today p. 13A (Feb. 28, 2006).

"A Question of Ethics." USA Today p. 13A (Nov. 14, 2006).

"Constitutional Swag." Roll Call (June 19, 2006).

"Gen. Hayden Earns His 'Bones' and a Nomination." Chicago Tribune p. C27 (May 10, 2006).

"Well-Paved Road to Political Perdition." Chicago Tribune p. C7 (June 25, 2006).

"The Case for Macroscopic Humans." USA Today p. 13A (July 18, 2006).

"A War With Flags But No Faces." USA Today p. 11A (Aug. 17, 2006).

"NSA Ruling Much Like a Pig in Parlor." Chicago Tribune p. C5 (Aug. 20, 2006).

"Why Race-Based 'Survivor' Makes Us Squirm." USA Today p. 13A (Sept. 14, 2006).

"Give the Dead Their Due." The Washington Post p. B01 (Sept. 17, 2006).

"Get Congress Out of the Page Business." New York Times p. 31A (Oct. 4, 2006).

"The Roberts Court: Seeing is Believing." USA Today p. 11A (July 6, 2006).

"Insanity's Legal Fall from Grace." USA Today p. 13A (May 30, 2006).

"A Page Protection Act: The Path to Saving a History Program." Roll Call (Oct. 5, 2006).

"An 'Old' Prison Solution." Los Angeles Times p. B17 (Oct. 7, 2006).

"109th Congress Just Can't Resist." USA Today p. 13A (Oct. 19, 2006).

"The Nomination of John Roberts. It's Time to be Afraid, Very Afraid." Chicago Tribune p. C9 (July 24, 2005).

"A Right Turn on the High Court?" USA Today p. 13A (June 27, 2005).

"Candidates for the Supreme Court: Judging the Short List." USA Today p. 13A (June 27, 2005).

"So What's the Story on Bob Novak? His Decision to Play It Cagey in the Plame Case is Helping No One." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (July 1, 2005).

"To Improve the Supreme Court, Let's Expand It." Roll Call (July 19, 2005).

"Democrats' Disarray Muddies Court Fight." The Baltimore Sun p. 21A (July 14, 2005).

"Michael, Meet Fatty. And Errol and Martha and . . ." The Washington Post p. B01 (June 19, 2005).

"Military Scapegoats Walk a Well-Worn Path." USA Today p. 13A (June 7, 2005).

"When is Violent Speech Still Free Speech?" USA Today p. 13A (May 3, 2005).

"The Not So Dirty Dozen: They're the Undercard to the Fight Over a High Court Nomination." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Apr. 18, 2005).

"Dissing the Dead to Save the Accused: Blake Lawyers Used an Old Technique." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Mar. 4, 2005).

"Estrich's Vicious Attack." The Washington Times p. A19 (Mar. 14, 2005).

"The Faith of John Roberts." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (July 25, 2005).

"Mr. Frist Goes to Washington." U.S.A. Today p. 15A (Apr. 7, 2005).

"What Qualifies One for the Supreme Court?" USA Today p. 13A (Oct. 6, 2005).

"Temptation Tops the Constitution." U.S.A. Today p. 13A (Mar. 23, 2005).

"Bob Woodward's Belated Disclosure Raises Troubling Questions." The Baltimore Sun p. 27A (Nov. 17, 2005).

"Bush and Domestic Spying: Good for America?" USA Today p. 11A (Dec. 22, 2005).

"After the Hurricanes, It's Raining Money." Los Angeles Times p. B13 (Sept. 28, 2005).

"A Parent's Right to Know." USA Today p. 13A (Dec. 6, 2005).

"A Model for the Future." 27 National Law Journal no. 26, p. 27 (Aug. 1, 2005).

"The Crazy World of Insanity Law." Los Angeles Times p. B11 (Nov. 11, 2005).

"Chicago's Segregted Schools." Chicago Tribune p. C25 (Nov. 10, 2005).

"Wanted: A Redeeming Character." USA Today p. 15A (Nov. 1, 2005).

"Bork is Owed an Explanation." 27 National Law Journal no. 55, p. 30 (Oct. 3, 2005).

"Roberts the Elder." Village Voice p. 24 (Sept. 20, 2005).

"Shame on You: Enough with the Humiliating Punishments, Judges." The Washington Post p. B03 (Sept. 18, 2005).

"Role Models for Roberts." USA Today p. 23A (Sept. 12, 2005).

"Roberts: The Before and The After." USA Today p. 13A (Aug. 31, 2005).

"When Justices Won't Go." Los Angeles Times p. B19 (Aug. 13, 2005).

"Our Forgotten Citizens." 26 National Law Journal no. 63, p. 34 (Dec. 20, 2004).

"A Check on Wartime Power." 26 National Law Journal no. 75, p. 26 (Mar. 7, 2005).

"Not as Radical as All That." (Editorial on Supreme Court's decision on gay rights in Lawrence v. Texas.) 25 Legal Times no. 46, p. 31 (July 14, 2003).

" . . . 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19." (Editorial on increasing the size of the Supreme Court.) 26 Legal Times no. 32, p. 50 (Aug. 11, 2003).

"Seeing Red on Blue Slips." Los Angeles Times (May 16, 2001) at pt. 2, p.13.

"The Ghost Fleet and other Dumb Ideas." Chicago Tribune (May 20, 2001) at p. 21.

"Bush Loses Senate." Washington Times (May 29, 2001) at A15.

"Nation of Mutts in a Muddle." Los Angeles Times (July 3, 2001), at p.2, p. 13.

"Is This Beach Clean Enough? Despite Progress, Serious Environmental Risks Remain." Legal Times (May 29, 2000) at 66.

"Citizen Clinton is Not Above the Law." Newsday (Aug. 21, 2000) at A23.

"Lawyers and the Lynching." National Law Journal (Aug. 7, 2000) at A1.

"Selective Prosecution: Don't Confuse Charles Bakaly with Bill Clinton." Washington Times (July 24, 2000) at A19.

"Telling What Wasn't Secret." New York Times (July 17, 2000) at A19.

"Ray is Damned if He Does or if He Doesn't." Los Angeles Times (Aug. 22, 2000) at B9.

"Court Strikes Health Balance on HMO's." Wall Street Journal (June 13, 2000) at A26.

"Of Boy Scouts and Bigots." Chicago Tribune (June 30, 2000) at 27.

"Clinton Fully Merits Being Disbarred." Newsday (May 25, 2000) at A51.

"Navy Undermines Client Privilege." National Law Journal (Apr. 3, 2000) at A22.

"A Bad Canadian Heads South." Wall Street Journal (Feb. 28, 2000) at A41.

"The Mouse that Roared - and Voted." Los Angeles Times (Jan. 17, 2000) at B5.

"'Miranda' - Confirmed but Barely Alive." Washington Post (June 27, 2000) at A23.

"History Shows Ballot Fights can Wound President." USA Today (Nov. 13, 2000) at 31A.

"Vote of Congress May Offer Real Political Closure." USA Today (Nov. 22, 2000) at 29A.

"Presidential Transition in Amber." USA Today (Dec. 5, 2000) at 17A.

"The Scariest Part may be Yet to Come." Los Angeles Times (Dec. 8, 2000) at B9.

"Perspective on Justice." Los Angeles Times (June 19, 2000) at B7.

"A Farewell to Sid Yates." Chicago Tribune (Oct. 10, 2000) at p. 15.

"The Trial Lawyer of the Century." Legal Times (Nov. 29, 1999) at 50.

"Senators Prefer Politics to their Roles as Jurors." National Law Journal (Jan. 25, 1999) at A27.

"What's Wrong with Wright." Wall Street Journal (Apr. 19, 1999) at A22.

"A Verdict in a Land of No Absolutes." Newsday (Feb. 15, 1999) at A29.

"Bad Timing on Contempt Ruling." Wall Street Journal (May 4, 1999) at A23.

"The Right Verdict? It's All Relative." Los Angeles Times (Feb. 12, 1999) at A7.

"Pulp Justice." Los Angeles Times (May 5, 1999) at A7.

"Could this Case be the End of TV Talk Show Traps?" USA Today (May 13, 1999) at 15A.

"Trial and Error." 51 National Review 22 (Feb. 8, 1999).

"Talk Show Tort Wars Ahead." National Law Journal (June 7, 1999) at A29.

"You Don't Impeach a Chief Executive Officer." National Law Journal (Mar. 1, 1999) at A22.

"The New Profiteers of the Tobacco War." Wall Street Journal (Sept. 20, 1999) at A29.

"The Trial of the Century." Legal Times (Sept. 27, 1999) at 27.

"Reforming the Great American Litigation Lottery." Chicago Tribune (Oct. 31, 1999) at A19.

"Madison Felled by Tobacco?" National Law Journal (Dec. 13, 1999) at A28.

"Last Rites for the Independent Counsel Act." The Chicago Tribune (June 30, 1999) at A21.

"Nothing Bars Questioning President's Bad Ideas." Los Angeles Times (Sept. 27, 1999) at B7.

"The President Resorts to Jury Nullification." Wall Street Journal (Dec. 15, 1998) at A22.

"Clinton's Nullification Strategy of Last Resort." National Law Journal (July 13, 1998) at A19.

"Guarding the King, Not his Secrets." Legal Times (Feb. 2, 1998) at 28.

"Clinton Maneuvers Threaten his Office." National Law Journal (Feb. 23, 1998) at A19.

"Grand Jury as Grand Opera." Legal Times (Feb. 23, 1998) at 31.

"The Paula Jones Case Under a Suppression Strategy." Los Angeles Times (Apr. 3, 1998) at A11.

"The Jones Case: Too Fast on the Escape." Newsday (Apr. 7, 1998) at A43.

"The President and the Damage Done." Legal Times (Apr. 20, 1998) at 24.

"Praetorian Privilege." Wall Street Journal (Apr. 27, 1998) at A23.

"The Trouble with Hubble." The Chicago Tribune (May 3, 1998) at A11.

"Call Clinton to Grand Jury." National Law Journal (May 4, 1998) at A21.

"How We Try Our Leaders." Legal Times (Dec. 21, 1998) at 39.

"Why Clinton Wants to be Impeached." Wall Street Journal (July 6, 1998) at A15.

"Without Testimony or a Trial, Censure is Harmless Precedent." USA Today (Dec. 23, 1998) at 13A.

"Hashing Out Ockham's Razor over Eggs." The Chicago Tribune (July 13, 1998) at A11.

"Witness for the Prosecution." The Chicago Tribune (Aug. 30, 1998) at 19.

"A Little Bit Impeached." Legal Times (Sept. 7, 1998) at 25.

"Perjury is not Politics." Wall Street Journal (Sept. 14, 1998) at A23.

"Impeachment." USA Today (Sept. 14, 1998) at 10A.

"The New Originalists." Legal Times (Oct. 19, 1998) at 27.

"High Crimes and Misdemeanors, According to the Framers." Wall Street Journal (Nov. 9, 1998) at A15.

"Checking the Executive Pulse." Los Angeles Times (Nov. 19, 1998) at A11.

"Is He Too Popular to Impeach?" Los Angeles Times (Dec. 9, 1998) at A15.

"Why the President Must be Impeached." The Baltimore Sun (Dec. 11, 1998) at 33A.

"Don't Confuse Remedies and Penalties." Newsday (Dec. 18, 1998) at A73.

"The Approaching Constitutional Crisis." The Chicago Tribune (June 5, 1998) at A13.

"Bill of Attainder." Los Angeles Times (Feb. 26, 1996) at B4.

"One American at a Time: Legislating by Bill of Attainder." Legal Times (Feb. 26, 1996) at 29.

"Federalizing a Custody Case." The Washington Post (Feb. 10, 1996) at A22.

"Legislating Values for One Family at a Time." Washington Times (Mar. 26, 1996) at A15.

"A Model Senator: When Does Corporate Publicity Become Political Contribution?" Legal Times (Apr. 18, 1996) at 24.

"Black Bag Justice." Legal Times (Nov. 21, 1994) at 28.

"The Government Versus the Grand Jury." The Chicago Tribune (Sept. 23, 1993) at A11.

"A Simple Matter of Retaliation." Legal Times (Jan. 25, 1993) at 43.

"Crimes Against the Environment." Wall Street Journal (Feb. 3, 1993) at A15.

"Environmental Crime." Time (Feb. 22, 1993) at 10

"We Need to Unearth Environmental Felons." Wall Street Journal (Mar. 11, 1993) at A15.

"Free the Rocky Flats 13." The Washington Post (Aug. 13, 1993) at A11.

"Environmental Law and Order: New Administration Should End Lax Enforcement of Pollution Laws." 106 The Los Angeles Daily Journal 6 (March 25, 1993).

"A Solution to Prison Overcrowding." USA Today Magazine (Nov. 1992) at 80.

"Why Prison Health Care is a Crime." The Chicago Tribune (Mar. 19, 1991) at A19.

"Our Prison Profiteers." New York Times (Aug. 3, 1990) at A20.

"Solving Prison Overcrowding - Prisons aren't Nursing Homes." New York Times (Oct. 9, 1989) at A17.

"Global Dinosaurs: Charting the Rise and Fall of Great Powers." The Chicago Tribune (May 8, 1988) at 5, 9.

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

55. Cable news hack.

If he were on Fox instead of MSNBC, nobody would give him a second glance.