Liz Cheney takes after her dad and mom. She's being interviewed on MSNBC...

[Hieronymus]

and defending torture.

[polichick]

1. Dad + Mom = CREEPY & NASTY!!

[Jennicut]

2. Uggg, why can't ALL the Cheneys just go away.

Please, you people are not in power any more. We have a new VP and Prez. Do they not get that?
Also, Liz..your Daddy was a war criminal.

[Skidmore]

3. Wow! Just effin' wow! I've been watching that little guttersnipe.

OMG, she does have the black heart of her father with her mothers vocal vitriol. What a piece of work!

I'm trying to cook and the stove is downstair and the computer is upstairs. I need go down to stir but just wanted to comment on how hideous this person is.

[alsame]

4. Yes, it's frightening to think that there's at least one more

generation of them out there. :scared:

[lisa58]

5. I just logged on to see if anyone else was watching...

....I know they believe their own bs, but I think it's telling that the only person defending Cheney is a family member.

[Parker CA]

9. The fact that someone had to tell her to trot out and defend her father's crimes

is one of the clearest signs yet of their extreme desperation.

[monmouth]

16. The only light I will derive from this is that he's not feeling well at all

and had to send her in. His pacemaker is acting up and he has chest pains. Am I a terrible person to be wondering this?????

[islandgirl808]

6. omg

the spawn of satan! does she have kids?? i hope not...i'd call social services if she does :scared:

[lisa58]

7. she's got 4

[Hieronymus]

15. Liz has 5 kids .... see the link below.

http://www.nndb.com/people/563/000122197/

[lisa58]

23. I guess I missed one

[butterfly77]

8. They are coming out of the woodworks!

I am seeing republiCONS I haven't seen in years, they are all over the tv THEY ARE SCARED...

[JohnnyBoots]

10. Total Slytherin.

[firedupdem]

11. She's as smarmy as her father. Pure Evil. n/t

[Cha]

12. Fuckers said "they didn't torture" ..now

they're caught with their tiny dicks hangin' out..they say it's okay.

[Skidmore]

13. Said "he [Cheney] does not need permission" to speak out

when asked why he is doing so and * is not. Has Cheney asked * for permission to speak? "No!"

[ErinBerin84]

14. that was really disgusting

she finds it "disturbing" that Holder hasn't seen the other memos (the ones that claim torture "worked" I assume).

[Mike Daniels]

18. I'm sure Saddam would have said torture worked as well

It's amazing that these people are so dense that they don't realize who they're keeping company with when they defend this crap.

[firedupdem]

17. HA! There is something very disturbing in the cheney water!

Lawrence is ripping them a new one!

He is pissed too that he wasn't allowed on with her. He's discussing that none of those cheney's ever served in the military.

[Hieronymus]

20. Lawrence is wonderful. He was seething there.

[ErinBerin84]

19. haha

Jonathan Capehart now saying that he agrees with Lawrence "100% that it's too bad they couldn't have had someone on to counter Liz Cheney."

[jenmito]

21. She's creepy. She has the same grumbling sound in her spech. She's also

saying it's "troubling" that Obama would allow for the release of the memos before knowing if they worked or not (as if torture is justified if it gained any useful information). Then she kept denying that it's torture, using the "logic" that we did it to our own guys (put them through waterboarding practice) so it CAN'T be torture. She's scummy.

[HillWilliam]

27. Some "logic" those creeps have

There's a world of difference between someone testing-out a waterboard simulation once when they know for a fact that either they'll wash out of school and the test will be over or they'll pass and the test will be over

and

being waterboarded 183 fucking times in one month with no end in sight, no control over it, hour after hour, day after day.

Anyone who can say that there's any comparison between the two should try option two and see how they like it.

I dee-double-dog-dare them. I double-down the double-dog-dare.

See how many of those chickenhawk motherfuckers show up the first time.

Thought not.

[jenmito]

29. Of course that's illogical...

they also flat-out LIE, claiming it got useful information. Good think Lawrence O'Donnell came on after her setting the record straight, that the "plot" to stop the attack of the Library Tower was discovered a year before KSM was tortured (and it wasn't even a realistic plot).

[ErinBerin84]

22. good

now they have Richard Wolfe on. At least they are having people on now to debunk Cheney's claims. I'm reading Mayer's book right now, the Bush administration dodged like all fucking hell to specifically disclose these techniques to people within the administration who they deemed "loyal enough", to quell any opposition, so Liz's claims are really bogus. Christ, Cheney's wife coming next?

[grassfed]

24. only thing standing between Cheney and jail are his threats to unleash another 9/11

to "prove" that the US is not safe without Bush/Cheney policies.

[AzDar]

25. She even has his mannerisms: working her fingers together while hunching over like a bird of prey.

She's repulsive.

[jenmito]

26. I was just going to add that to my post-her creepy hand-rubbing just like her father.

[riverwalker]

28. funny, she dosen't use husband's name

but then, he husband is an asshole too. Does the whole family suck off the milk of the government? Doesn't anyone have a real job?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-maher/philip-perry-treasonous-_b_42377.html

Philip Perry, Treasonous Fucker
March 1, 2007
by Bill Maher


Five years after 9/11, you figure our government would have already solved the obvious security concerns, like protecting our chemical plants or keeping razors away from Britney. But we've failed miserably. Why?

Meet Philip Perry. Already, I can tell you don't like him. Because his name's Philip Perry, which sounds like the name of a guy who would screw the common interest on behalf of powerful corporations. And if you guessed that's what he did for a living, you'd be right.


As documented in this incisive Washington Monthly article by Art Levine, after 9/11 the Environmental Protection Agency looked at chemical plants across the U.S. and concluded that at least 700 sites posed a potential threat to kill or injure over 100,000 people if attacked. In neocon math, that's over thirty 9/11s.

After nearly a year's worth of work led by Christie Todd Whitman and Tom Ridge, twelve senior Bush administration officials met in March of 2003 to finalize legislation granting Whitman's EPA the authority to oversee chemical plant security and require them to submit plans for lowering their risks. But then Philip Perry, at that time the general counsel for the White House Office of Management and Budget, waltzed in, said Congress would never go for it, and the deal was dead. Our chemical plants would have to go back to being protected by the same folks who protected them before: nobody.
<snip>

[WinkyDink]

30. "Liz": Short for "Lizard-spawn"?

[TeamJordan23]

31. She lied. The info we got from torture did not save any American lives. nm

[AspenRose]

32. They're running scared.

That's why they won't shut up.