Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC.com: Obama to be spectacular success — or failure?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 03:09 PM
Original message
MSNBC.com: Obama to be spectacular success — or failure?
This headline on MSNBC.com:

Obama to be spectacular success — or failure?
Wrangling a 24/7 news cycle and an ambitious agenda is no easy task


By Chuck Todd
Chief White House correspondent and political director
NBC News

WASHINGTON - The current spate of 100 days media coverage has the feel of the old adage, "Everything's been said, just not everyone has said it."

And yet, it's amazing how little attention we've given to what the Obama presidency looks like from 30,000 feet.

The lack of context these days, particularly in this current 24/7, attention deficit disorder news environment, is one of the sadder developments in Washington.

This is particularly disturbing for those who can't get enough of history, or for political junkies who organize their bookshelves by presidential terms (did I just admit that?).

But that's the thing — conservatives and liberals alike can agree on one thing after 100 days of President Barack Obama: This guy is going to be consequential.

Now, how one defines "consequential" depends on the point of view.

Nothing about the first 100 days indicates that the president wants to be judged on his incremental achievements.

And while we've probably never elected a president whose goal was to tread water and simply not screw up the country, one can sense that we're at a crossroads in the American story.

The rest of the story at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30460145?GT1=43001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skeewee08 Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I voted A and it took him to 33.7%
you should read some of the rethugs comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. "we've probably never elected a president whose goal was to...simply not screw up the country."
I dunno. That seemed to be the principal goal of pretty much every President from Grant to Hoover, perhaps excepting Teddy Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson's second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't remember any of these M$M asshats saying that about Bush.
There was never any 'he's popular now, but just wait' crap.

And Upchuck Toad is one of the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC