|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:04 PM Original message |
My preference for Souter's replacement...provided he does retire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sorry, but she's too old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. I agree she is just 8 years younger than Souter who is retiring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why? Too many quality judges out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. Oh my god. That would be AWESOME. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. It works on so many levels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Would rather have someone younger than Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Well, according to the constitution, there are no qualifications at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 06:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
39. The Constitution doesn't state a lot of things specifically, but these are implicitly understood and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peacetrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. great minds think alike.. just musing on that myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 12:41 AM Response to Reply #3 |
21. Quite apart from her qualifications, I'm salivating at what it would do to our opposition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
33. I was pinged on this post but had to see it for myself. Yikes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
36. In what respect, Charlie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. Only if we can clone her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. She's needed at State |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. Yes, or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
10. I would love that too, but she's sec of state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
11. NO, she would be a better replacement for this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. I am thinking young 50's or even late 40's/ SOmeone who can be there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
13. God no... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:41 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Some of the best justices weren't judges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
15. Not I, jeffdem; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErinBerin84 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
16. that would be neat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-30-09 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
17. I think she is doing fine where she is. Why is the bench of choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
22. Yes, just what we need. Nominate a 62 year old to the SCOTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
23. Works for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
24. I'm really loving her at State. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
25. She is about to be 62, we need someone in thier early 50's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Better yet, someone in their early 40's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiller4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
26. We need her at State. There are better and younger candidates.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
27. Someone younger, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shaniqua6392 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 06:18 AM Response to Original message |
28. I would like it to be Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl_interrupted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
29. Just love that picture of Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muffin1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 06:28 AM Response to Original message |
30. I would prefer Diane Wood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistler162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
31. The nice men in white coats with the long sleeved jacket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
35. Um, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
37. She's doing an excellent job as Secretary of State. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
38. nope. she's doing well as sec of state and would be an odd choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC