Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bayh Safe for Re-Election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:40 PM
Original message
Bayh Safe for Re-Election
A new Hamilton Campaigns poll conducted for Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN) suggests little reason for concern as he looks towards re-election in 2010.

Key findings: 74% of Indiana voters see Bayh in a favorable light while just 23% view him unfavorably. Bayh's favorability ratings are high across party lines with 74% of Independents and 61% of Republicans viewing him in a positive light.

And if those numbers aren't enough to fend off a Republican challenge, he also has amassed a war chest of $11.4 million.

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/05/01/bayh_safe_for_re-election.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. His politics likely reflect his consituents.
It's the challenge when thinking about trying to move in a more progessive direction. You can just target Dems. that aren't progressive enough, or you can think about the fact that they usually reflect their constituency and design strategies to move that public in a more progressive direction...

There's no simply fix, and I don't like conservadems in our national party either. But I do understand why they end up there, and I think changing that is going to have more with changing conditions "on the ground" than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Like his constituents support the banksters he protects
I don't think so....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually, I do think so.
His constituents are "moderates," some conservatives - and yes they have a very different interpretation of things that you and I do.

I know a little bit about this, being a leftist in the second most conservative state in the union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's all a matter of how you frame the issues
Align that guy with his out of state fat cats and support for failed economic policies that have hurt the people back home, and you have an entirely different argument.

That said, there's no accounting for Idaho (or Eastern Oregon for that matter).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes, but framing the issues would have to do with changing minds of constituents.
Which is what I said in my first post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I guess we'll have to disagree based on our experiences
There are few things people hate right now more than Wall Street fat cats and their enablers shitting all over Main Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. His constituents also voted for the President
I buy that excuse from people who represent red states. The NRSC is having so much trouble fielding a candidate against him largely because of the work that the Obama campaign did in Indiana. Bayh owes the President big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yup, folks must come to terms with the need to change the electorate
the politicians will follow, albeit slowly. Those calling for a primary opponent for Bayh and the like are ignoring reality. In many if not most cases, a much more liberal candidate would simply result in electing a staunch conservative and matters would be worse despite a more cohesive caucus.

How the lesson of the incredible shrinking party is missed is beyond me. Especially, with a working example right in front of our eyes.

The other fix is getting more of the population into the electorate. I think the vast majority of the people who cannot be bothered to vote would more closely align with us than the Reich but they are lazy, disinterested, or hopelessly jaded and therefore are worthless to getting anything done and unimportant to the conversation.

It doesn't matter one iota what "most people" think or want in the context of politics. Only the electorate is significant and in that battle things are closer than many will accept or admit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. One could make the argument that Bayh "has" to be a conservative shill to win Indiana
Except his last name is Bayh. And his father didn't have to be a 'Puke to win there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. His dad lost
to Danforth Quayle.

Its actually the thing that drives Evan in the direction he's in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. I should imagine -- Indiana is after all a good state for moderate Republicans.
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. This will be one Democrat that I will not vote for in the next election.
And I will encourage my fellow union members at the plant that I retired from to not vote for him too. UNLESS, he supports EFCA and single payer health care.

I will tell them to not vote for the Republican either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well considering healthy numbers it won't really be that important when the time comes.?
Edited on Fri May-01-09 09:04 PM by cooolandrew
Bayh can only come along for the ride or dwindle into insignificance. This time it's business he can either be an asset or a loss. All depnds which side of history he finds more comfortable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC