Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama to revive military tribunals with more rights for detainees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
soccermomforobama Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:14 PM
Original message
Obama to revive military tribunals with more rights for detainees
President Barack Obama will restart Bush-era military tribunals for a small number of Guantanamo detainees, reviving a fiercely disputed trial system he once denounced but with new legal protections for terror suspects, U.S. officials said Thursday.

Obama suspended the tribunals within hours of taking office in January, ordering a review but stopping short of abandoning President George W. Bush's strategy of prosecuting suspected terrorists.

<snip>

The changes to the system were to be announced Friday. Two senior administration officials outlined several of the rules changes, which will be carried out by executive authority, to The Associated Press on Thursday night. They include:

-Restrictions on hearsay evidence that can be used in court against the detainees.

-A ban on all evidence obtained through cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. This would include statements given from detainees who were subjected to waterboarding, a form of simulated drowning.

-Giving detainees greater leeway in choosing their own military counsel.

-Protecting detainees who refuse to testify from legal sanctions or other court prejudices.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/14/obama-to-revive-military-_n_203783.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lovely. When the next Republican is President perhaps "Tribunals" will also extend to Americans
suspected of "treason." :nuke:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Did you just find that site or something?
You've been spamming those inane cards all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onetwo Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Judging by how easily these tribunals can be outlawed and reinstated...
...Obama's actions either way will have zero bearing on the next guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Und die Kriegsgerichte bleiben....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm shaking my head. WTF is he doing?
Edited on Thu May-14-09 10:04 PM by LittleBlue
What is his concern with trying them in the court system?

He had better not do this. If, in 3 years, these men are being tried by tribunals, I will not be present at the voting booth. That's a promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You have an excellent point. Might as well let the GOP take us into hell because THEN, just
Edited on Thu May-14-09 10:09 PM by ShortnFiery
perhaps by THEN, the American people will be hurting so much that they will FORCE MAJOR CHANGES in our thoroughly corrupt political system.

I'm with you ... the only way may be for us to let things get so bad that we FULLY clean out our career Politicians and start anew. :shrug:

That's really sad, but probably true.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. If we're headed down the shitter, might as well let them do the driving
and if Obama wants to give them the steering wheel because he doesn't care about his base, that's his decision and not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soccermomforobama Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think what one of his concerns might be is the information
that would come out about these 20 detainees. My assumption is that for these detainees we have credible (not obtained through torture) information that has helped us divert another attack or maybe given us information about other terrorist cells that should not be public record. The way to give them a trial but still keep that information "private" is to try them in military tribunals but restore rights to them that were denied under Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Er, he's trying prisoners who cannot be indefinitely detained,
and who he has determined cannot be tried in courtrooms for whatever reason. What does it look like he's doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. You can't try people you capture on the battlefield in Afghanistan in a courtroom
The battlefield isn't a crime scene and technically they didn't violate US law. They are being detained because they are essentially prisoners of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Would you consider please starting an OP explaining this?
Not sure it would help... but it might.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Keeping a campaign promise to fix the tribunal process? Giving the detainees their day in court?


Seriously! WTF is he DOING!?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. What court?
A court full of Bushies? The guys who gave us Bush? Greeeeaat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Does the Geneva Convention allow this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes. Tribunals are nothing new. The Third Geneva Convention forbids
"the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples."

If Obama sets up the tribunals so that they are fair, legitimate, and offer fundamental legal protections, then he is operating within the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soccermomforobama Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Here is something I found through a quick google search.
Edited on Thu May-14-09 10:34 PM by soccermomforobama
It appears that some of the rights of the detainees that he is restoring brings us more into compliance with the Geneva Conventions.

As written, President Bush's order does not allow a defendant to be represented by counsel of his own choice, only to have an attorney provided to him. Article 105 of the Third Geneva Convention, on the other hand, states that "the prisoner of war shall be entitled...to defense by a qualified advocate or counsel of his own choice." Apparently, this conflict with the laws of war is being rectified by regulations drafted by the Defense Department. The New York Times has reported that "under the draft regulations, defendants would have military defense lawyers appointed for them but would also be able to hire civilian lawyers."<4>

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/15122

Obama is granting them more choice in regards to their counsel

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Unfortunately, the left wants these detainees to be treated
as American Citizens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. They are innocent until proven guilty. You don't have to be american for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. yes it's unfortunate the EEEVIL left wants these detainees
treated humanely. guilty until proven innocent, CORRECT? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
18. So much for breaking with the sordid past.
Military Tribunals? They haven't changed since Pilate heard the case of Rome v. Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
19. Kinder, gentler military tribunals
Military tribunals served with sugar cookies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC