Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shrewd Choice of "Debating" Partner

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 07:03 PM
Original message
Shrewd Choice of "Debating" Partner

Shrewd Choice of "Debating" Partner

I don't have a lot to say about the unusual "debate"--via back to back speeches at different locations--between the President of the United States and the former Vice President of the United States in Washington today. You can read them here and here, and judge for yourself, or check out the many assessments on the internet (e.g., this early one from Jacob Heilbrunn calling it a rout for Obama).

More interesting to me is the way Team Obama created this "event" in the first place, showing how smart tactics can promote smart strategy.

Remember where we were just yesterday on the "anti-terrorism" issues that were the centerpiece of the Obama-Cheney "debate." The President was getting hit from every direction on his handling of detainee polices, investigations of interrogation practices, and increasingly, his Iraq and Afghanistan strategies. It seemed nearly everyone was calling him a wimp, a hypocrite, or both, from their varying perspectives. The U.S. Senate had dealt him an embarrassing bipartisan blow on funding for shutting down Gitmo.

It's hard to imagine a better "reframer" of these issues than a "debate" with Dick Cheney, a deeply unpopular man who is determined to defend the very worst practices of the Bush administration, in a manner that reminds Americans--progressives and moderate independents alike--exactly why they voted for Barack Obama, even if they are disappointed with him on this or that issue. And aside from the specific issues in discussion, there is simply no downside for the White House or for Democrats in keeping Cheney front-and-center as the snarling voice and brooding face of the GOP.

If, in addition to everything else, the initial perception that Obama cleaned Cheney's clock is broadly shared, you'd have to consider this a tactical and strategic ten-strike for the White House, at a time, and on a topic, where he needed one. The next "frame" (sorry for the bowling metaphor, but I couldn't resist!) could produce different results, but it was a good day's work for the President of the United States.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shrewd is a term often used to describe President Obama
at least from perceptive and thoughtful observers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cheney's speech ignored some inconvenient truths
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. I just gave the 5 Rec'd~
I like this Democratic Strategist's comments.

I'd read that cheney had this planned for weeks and I'm not sure when Prez Obama came up with giving his speech today but the timing is perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Cheney's mechanical heart must be busting with frustration...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC