Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOL....Let another country hold one of our soldiers with no charges forever and see what we do!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 01:50 PM
Original message
LOL....Let another country hold one of our soldiers with no charges forever and see what we do!
I guarantee this country would freak out.

And I am sure people here will say "Well, that is different, our guys would not deserve it but their guys do!".

Remember, to the enemy, we look as evil as the terrorists do to us.

We always get away with stuff we would not put up with from other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Imagine a 8-yr old American boy being raped by guards while being held in jail
on no charges whatsoever.

Imagine a US soldier being tortured by say the Chinese via waterboarding...

Oh yeah, we'd sure hear the screeching of rage then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can't compare the two...we have "soldiers" and they are "Muslins"...
Ya see the difference?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was our guy committing a war crime?
Or even accused of committing a war crime or otherwise in violation of the Geneva Convention?

I'm afraid you're oversimplifying things Rachel ..... I mean Kansas. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. OK, so the troops who broke laws, you think we would have been ok with.....
them holding them forever and not charging them??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They were US citizens, subject to US laws ........ try again. ;-) NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. we are holding citizens of other countries who are subject to their country's laws
we have had Australians and Brits, to name a few from what I guess some would deem "civilized" (i.e., "white" "Christian") countries. That has not stopped anything, and will not stop people from being detained without charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Dozens are being held by the U.S. military without even an accusation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. A war crime like being a baker? Or a photographer? Or a teenager?
Was our soldier sold to their CIC? It could happen.

I'm afraid you don't know how many totally innocent people we are holding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. the Gitmo detainees are not accused of committing war crimes either.
In fact, irony of ironies, it is a war crime to detain them at Gitmo and torture them.

WE, not they, are accused of war crimes. The truth is even simpler than you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. under "preventive detention," it won't matter. They won't be charged with ANYthing
let alone war crimes.

By the way, "war crimes" are apparently okay now, as is violating the Geneva Conventions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. If crimes are committed we can try and convict or release.
The analogous situation would be if they held our men for being members of an "evil organization" like the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which country is Al Quida
represetative of? How many Pakistani soldiers do we have in captivity. How many Saudi soldiers do we have captivity. How many Syrian soldiers do we have in captivity. The answer is none. The people we have in captivity do not represent a country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Iraq is a country. It's where the torture is known to have happended
Edited on Fri May-22-09 08:58 PM by lunatica
Abu Grahib? Do you recall that? It's a country last I heard. And none of the tortured seem to have been Al Qaeda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. How many of the prisoners held at Abu Grahib
were prisoners of war from the Iraqi Army?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. The iraqi army was disbanded by the US. They were never an issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. So the answer is none. If there were no prisoners of war
at Abu Grhabe, the Geneva Convention does not apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrongBad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Did our soldier/citizen declare intention to harm their country on the record?
If so, I wouldn't blame them. He's a POW.

So long he is not being tortured this is within the accepted rules of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Essentially calling al Qaeda members "soldiers" is an extreme stretch. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. we might overlook it
if the soldiers had brown skin and a non-protestant-Christian religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. Why a soldier, why not anyone at random, without determining their guilt of anything
except being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Like for example, a traveler in the way of an occupying army.

Like being a Native American in the way of Manifest Destiny!!
Or like being a person of color in the way of a racist!
OPr like being a Muslim in the way of George Bush's god!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
18. This country already flipped
because a dead soldier was abused. People went apeshit when the clip of that dead soldier was shown being dragged through the streets in Somalia. How do they expect other people to react when they see awful pictures of their countrymen being abused?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. He (there were more than one) was not a soldier
He was a mercenary working for Blackwater and not a member of our military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
19. "soldiers"? what about tourists or aid workers who happen to be trapped in an occupation?
Edited on Sat May-23-09 06:30 AM by ima_sinnic
the invaders might consider them "dangerous" because they're Americans and therefore "sympathetic" to the "wrong side."
They could be anybody. They could be Doctors without Borders or working for CARE or OXFAM or Heifer Intl, but as long as that country's leader deems them "a possible threat," they could be locked up and the key thrown away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
22. American soldiers have been decapitated and dismembered by al-Qaeda in Iraq. (links -->)
Edited on Sat May-23-09 10:08 AM by ClarkUSA
Link 1: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/20/AR2006062000242.html
Link 2: http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/beheading_desecration_video_of_dead_us_soldiers_released_on_internet_by_al_qaeda_videoimages/
Link 3: http://de.geocities.com/infotaxi/iraq-decapitation/iraq-beheaded-breaking-news.html

I wonder what other countries would do if we beheaded their captive fighters after dismembering them and dragging their bodies behind our jeeps and shot video of our soldiers waving the foreign fighters' heads around?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
24. Well, there are the 2 women being held by the North Koreans.
Apparently Little Kim can keep them as long as he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC