by beachmom
During the course of the torture debate, I have heard little coming from the Senate Foreign Relations chairman, with the exception of his
appearance on video with USA Today on April 21st, where he said he would consider a truth commission modeled after the one in South Africa to bring about accountability. Since then, there has been essentially "radio silence" from him during the tumultuous weeks following the release of the torture memos. Well, I am happy to see he is
inserting some truth into this debate about the reality of the CIA's past. Too many bloviating blow hards (I'm talking to you,
Joe) have been positively outraged that the Speaker of the House would suggest the CIA could have lied!! Well, it's about time people learn their history going back to the Reagan years.
Huff Po has the story:The Central Intelligence Agency would never lie to Congress about breaking the law, would it?
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) knows a little something about that. During the late 1980s, he led a two-and-a-half year investigation into the CIA, the Nicaraguan Contras and cocaine trafficking, and the senator was on the receiving end of CIA deception.
So, would the CIA ever lie?
"In the case of one person who was tried and convicted, they lied. He overtly lied and was prosecuted for it by the government of the United States," said Kerry just off the Senate floor. "He was the director of operations for the region."
Ryan Grim's excellent piece over at the Huffington Post details the oh so wonderful history of how the CIA knew the Contras were involved in drug trafficking; they not only failed to intervene but even stopped the DEA from investigating! The fascinating hearings of John Kerry's investigation in the Senate in 1987/88 entitled "Drugs, Law Enforcement and Foreign Policy" can be read in full on
The Memory Hole.
To get an idea of what an explosive story this was, here is a
refresher course:
moreOn edit: use the link in the original for the refresher course.