Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If You Read Only One Article On How Obama Operates, It Should Really Be This One....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:13 PM
Original message
If You Read Only One Article On How Obama Operates, It Should Really Be This One....
Edited on Wed Jun-03-09 11:18 PM by BlooInBloo
Downside: It's long-ish.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/magazine/07congress-t.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hp

VERY interesting connecting of political dots. EDIT: While the chess analogy might be getting a bit played out, it's hard to escape that picture, after reading this article.


A smattering:

Obama has people on the INSIDE of both houses of Congress:

"Part of Biden’s White House portfolio is to act as unofficial ambassador to the Senate, carrying information back and forth between his old colleagues and his new boss. During the recent debate over the budget, he walked onto the Senate floor and plopped himself down, uninvited, next to Max Baucus, the Montana Democrat who as chairman of the powerful Finance Committee will be a central figure in the coming health care debates. Biden asked Baucus what he needed from the White House in order to get a health care bill through his committee, according to both men, and then the talkative Biden spent the better part of a half-hour simply listening quietly, promising as he left the chamber (“I give my word as a Biden,” he likes to say) to faithfully relay Baucus’s thoughts to the president. It was the kind of exchange that rarely took place in 1993, and it is a large part of why Obama’s team is optimistic about succeeding where Clinton failed."

"Emanuel has taken an unusually personal role in handling Congress. One of the first things he did as chief of staff was to give out his cellphone number to every Democratic senator (and some Republicans too), and he occasionally pops up on the House floor, jawing with one member or another. Like Biden, he still exercises on the Hill, at the House gym, mostly so he can jog next to members who might have a question or some new rumor to share. Emanuel’s wife and three children are still back in Chicago (they arrive in Washington later this month), and his social calendar is taken up by dinners with former House colleagues on both sides of the aisle, often at one of the trendy downtown restaurants he favors."



Obama is TACTICAL down to the nits:

"Of all the assets the White House has at its disposal, of course, none are more valuable than a three-dimensional president with a 60-plus-percent approval rating. Emanuel and I had been talking for just a few minutes when his office door suddenly burst open and the president strode in. I hadn’t seen Obama since interviewing him last September on the day when the stock market crashed (John McCain crashed soon after), so I congratulated him belatedly, and he chatted amiably for a few minutes, appearing entirely untroubled in the midst of the myriad crises facing his administration. Fumbling clumsily to button my suit coat as I stood in his presence, I was reminded of how different it is to talk with someone who has actually assumed the historical weight of the presidency, even if you’ve spoken with him before. Emanuel knows this phenomenon is as real for senators and congressmen as it is for reporters, which is why he choreographs the same kind of “spontaneous” drop-bys when members comes to see him. “I’ll have a lunch here, and he’ll come by to say hi to Susan Collins the way he came by to see you,” Emanuel told me after Obama departed, referring to the senator from Maine. “It’s an efficient use of his time.”"



Obama is THE BOSS:

"A hallmark of Obama’s style, in these early months, has been to meet with key senators alone, without the phalanx of aides who almost always attend Oval Office meetings. Three senators with whom I spoke, including Baucus, had been impressed by this tactic; it implies equality between the branches of government and enables Obama to establish personal relationships more quickly than he otherwise might. (“You been hunting lately?” Obama asked Ben Nelson when the Nebraska senator walked into the Oval Office and found himself, much to his surprise, alone with the president.) Advisers, of course, generally hate for their bosses to meet by themselves; the general rule among aides is that you should never leave politicians in a room alone where they might say or agree to something that can’t easily be reversed. When I asked Emanuel if he would prefer that the president have someone around while negotiating with individual lawmakers, he smiled tightly. “I prefer whatever he prefers,” the chief of staff said, sounding uncharacteristically diplomatic."



Obama keeps on WINNING:

"EMANUEL MAY HAVE been the one doing the shouting, but the House and Senate negotiators have reserved most of their rancor for one another. As a result, friction between House and Senate Democrats now seems to have reached a point where they might want to build their own virtual fence down the middle of the rotunda. And yet Obama has, thus far, gotten more or less what he wants out of the deal. Far from finding his path obstructed by centrist senators, in fact, Obama seems to be running a sophisticated game in which those senators are actually doing him a significant political favor. Thanks to them, Obama doesn’t have to pick any fights over spending or ideology with the liberal leaders in the House or with outside interest groups on the left, even when he thinks they’ve given in to excesses that will serve as fodder for his conservative critics. Rather, he simply encourages the House to go wild, and then he relies on centrists in the Senate to do the unpleasant work of scaling back the legislation, which yields a more politically palatable bill and one that’s probably more in keeping with his own essentially pragmatic philosophy anyway. And while House and Senate leaders may end up wanting to throttle one another, Obama gets to play the reluctant arbiter between the two, rather than actually having to challenge his base."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. so Baucus tells Biden "we need to blow health care corporations" & Biden does what?
Baucus is doing SOMETHING for those millions he takes from "health care" corporations.

Msongs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You just have to pretend to listen, not actually care what they tell you.
Remember Rahm saying that they just have to give the appearance of being bipartisan? Same analogy.
Baucus is an idiot that thinks he is important, just play around him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think Obama knew that Clinton had a hard time with Congress in the early 90's.
It pays off to have Rahm and Joe around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. He chose one of the leaders of the Senate as VP and....
.... a man who could have become Speaker of the House as his chief of staff.

I'm starting to think Obama actualy KNOWS what he's doing! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Naaaah!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Of course he knows what he is doing
I don't think anyone who has been critical of any of the decisions made actually believe he's a naive fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. It's the notion that we have more information on which we base our decisions...
.... than he does that I have a problem with. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I maybe critical at times.
However, I understand how he came to some conclusions, and I disagree sometimes with desired results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks -- and here's your 5th recommend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. "equality between the branches of government"
I think he's trying to make the government what it's supposed to be. Legislation works its way through the House and Senate, the people are engaged, the President uses the bully pulpit, and signs what the people have approved. As one of the people, not someone who thinks the government is for trillion dollar corporations and nobody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. brilliant how he neutralizes that pesky left wing!
seriously, that is a very good article about Obama and Congress, but it's far from a puff piece. Who wants puff pieces anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't recall calling it a puff piece...
I just thought the insight to the layers upon layers of detail (Cliton failure history, branchs' independence, etc), were all woven together, along with the discussion of Obama's response to that complete pie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. His second term....
...is gonna be awesome, fuckin' awesome.

Term one is for stabilizing, getting some important things done, taking care of business and getting re-elected.

Second term is crazy time, if he wants to make a mark that's when it will really happen.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R. This tactic frustrates supporters:
So far, he has managed to keep the parties talking largely because neither Democrats nor Republicans have any clear idea of which specific provisions Obama will accept — and that’s exactly the way Baucus wants to keep it. If the president were to shed his reticence and set out his terms for a bill, Republicans would focus on their differences with Obama and would most likely end up abandoning the process, either because they wouldn’t believe a compromise was possible or because they would want to seize on any excuse to derail his agenda. “Right now, the president sort of keeps them guessing as to what he might be supportive of,” says John Breaux, the former Democratic senator who is now a corporate lobbyist. “I think that’s why you still see Republicans actually trying to work on it.”

Silence from the administration tizn't necessarily capitulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Nice outtake. An initial wall of silence can also be like letting them blow their hot air...
into a sea of still air - it never gets rolling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ahhh fate....things dont always line up as one would wish
"IN THINKING ABOUT HEALTH CARE as a candidate, Obama expected to rely on two close allies who carried enormous influence on the issue with the Democratic Senate. The first was Tom Daschle, the former majority leader and a mentor of sorts, whom Obama considered as a chief of staff and ultimately nominated, instead, to the dual post of health secretary and “health care czar” in the West Wing. But then Daschle ran into tax issues during the prelude to his confirmation hearings (he failed to pay income taxes on a car and driver), and Obama, after some hesitation, rather bloodlessly cut him loose. The second man was Ted Kennedy, whose decades-long dedication to health care reform remains, like his stature, unrivaled on the Hill. Kennedy, of course, grew gravely ill during the presidential campaign, and while his staff remains deeply engaged in negotiations on a bill, the senator himself seems in no shape to muscle it through.

This strange sequence of events has suddenly elevated the profile of Max Baucus, a senator little known outside Montana. (It’s a circumstance made all the more striking by his longstanding disdain for Daschle, going back to a dispute over tax cuts.) "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Heh indeedy. And Obama adjusts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. Process is great- but when it comes down to it- results are what matter
Edited on Thu Jun-04-09 04:41 AM by depakid
and so Obama, like anyone else, will either pass or fail the test... in this case, it's all about responsible health care policy.

I hope he succeeds and delivers- or else goes down fighting.

Going along to get along isn't an option here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. A Great Article and why I subscribe to the Sunday Times here in Ohio...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC