Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "walkback" ---> CIA: Panetta doesn't believe Cheney rooting for terrorist attack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:13 PM
Original message
The "walkback" ---> CIA: Panetta doesn't believe Cheney rooting for terrorist attack
CIA: Panetta doesn't believe Cheney rooting for terrorist attack
Posted: 04:07 PM ET

(CNN) – A CIA spokesman is sharply downplaying Director Leon Panetta 's recent comments that appear to question whether former Vice President Dick Cheney is hoping for another terrorist attack against the United States.

"The Director does not believe the former Vice President wants an attack," CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano said in a statement to CNN. "He did not say that. He was simply expressing his profound disagreement with the assertion that President Obama's security policies have made our country less safe. Nor did he question anyone's motives."

The statement comes days after the New Yorker published an interview with Panetta during which he said Cheney's recent criticism of Obama – including the decision to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba – show the ex-vice president "smells some blood in the water on the national security issue."

"It's almost, a little bit, gallows politics," said Panetta. "When you read behind it, it's almost as if he's wishing that this country would be attacked again, in order to make his point."

Cheney's office released a terse statement from the vice president Monday responding to the comments, saying "I hope my old friend Leon was misquoted."

"The important thing is whether or not the Obama Administration will continue the policies that have kept us safe for the last 8 years," Cheney said.

Vice President Joe Biden also appeared to distance himself from Panetta's comments Sunday, telling NBC "I don't question motive."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/15/cia-panetta-doesnt-believe-cheney-rooting-for-terrorist-attack/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. And yet the amazing thing is that Panetta was barely attacked by Republicans for that
The official elected Republicans mostly refused to comment on a line that, however true, was a bit outside the usual boundaries of discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is freaking scary...
I pretty much predicted this earlier today:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3923783&mesg_id=3923838

What kind of crap did Cheney get on seemingly everyone during his stink as Vice Spy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think it's blackmail, I think it's a protection racket. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think of a protection racket as blackmail... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I think of blackmail as having something bad on someone and threatening to expose it.
Protection rackets don't require the victim to have some dirty secret, blackmail implies that they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. According to the word origin...
We're both right! I love when that happens:)

blackmail

Main Entry: black·mail
Pronunciation: \ˈblak-ˌmā(ə)l\
Function: noun
Etymology: black + 1mail
Date: 1552
1: a tribute anciently exacted on the Scottish border by plundering chiefs in exchange for immunity from pillage
2 a: extortion or coercion by threats especially of public exposure or criminal prosecution b: the payment that is extorted
— blackmail transitive verb
— black·mail·er noun

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blackmail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Cool! Thanks for looking it up. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not that much of a walkback, really. Panetta still got it out there.
He still 'profoundly disagrees' with Cheney's attempt to badmouth Obama's policies. Good. Cheney lost this confrontation, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Leon already covered that..he said,
"It appears"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another pussy Democrat. Why not stick to your guns?
Edited on Mon Jun-15-09 03:31 PM by Thrill
wimp. Cheney has basically been going around saying the same thing about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I know. I wish someone would stand up and say "Yep. I said it. I meant it. So there"
or something along those lines ;-) No backtracking allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SamCooke Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow, I just lost all respect for this guy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Really?!?!?!?! Quel Surprise. You'd think after yesterday you'd be lying a little low? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, one thing in Leon's column is
..it's aleady out there and cheney can watch his fucking mouth from now on..He's fucking emboldening the enemy.

Leon could have made that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. So it's OK for Cheney to say that Obama is making us less safe...
but it's not OK for Panetta to say it appears that Cheney wants us to be attacked?

Fuck Cheney!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. This is the kind of crap our feckless media promotes. They are just about worthless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. No, Dick, waterboarding does not 'keep us safe.' It creates more terrorists who want to kill us.
"The important thing is whether or not the Obama Administration will continue the policies that have kept us safe for the last 8 years," Cheney said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Fuck.
I thought Panetta had balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sounds like a phone call was made
And some vague inquiries about "the health of your family" were asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC