|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 07:57 AM Original message |
Taitz Files Response To Motion To Dismiss In Barnett v. Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. She starts off by misspelling Hillary Clinton's name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It's thirty-five pages of absolute drivel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I skipped to the end - get this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:11 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Making that distinction in a legal response is SOOOOO Important! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 12:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
41. It's a legal term in Latin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
58. I got to page eighteen before I got too light headed to continue. I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:11 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. The insanity is strong in this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:04 AM Response to Original message |
3. The fraud allegation on Page 2? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It's a veritable conspiracy theory lasagne! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
23. That was totally fantasy land to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 12:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
40. yup, noticed all of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
7. Think she could sanctioned in TWO courts?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. It's possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
46. Sanctioned? Orly's on the way to getting herself declared incompetent. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
8. Reads like it was written by Alan Keyes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:42 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I'm sure he had a lot of input into it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:39 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. lol but I didn't see the "attorney bits" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:53 AM Response to Reply #22 |
32. She used "quo warranto" a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
71. I've been a lawyer for 33 years and I've never used "quo warranto" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatGund (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:48 AM Response to Reply #8 |
28. Nope.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:49 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Excellent point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
47. Maybe they shared some "pillow time"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izquierdista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
9. How did she pass a bar exam? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:36 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Some states are easy, but there are a few, like New York, which are difficult |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
27. Academically bright often does not translate to courtroom brilliance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatGund (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:50 AM Response to Reply #9 |
30. The on-line law school she attended.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 10:46 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. All it does is prepare one for the Bar... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 10:49 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Which is why it is not acredited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 02:47 PM Response to Reply #34 |
57. Exactly.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 12:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
42. Her mail order school in California teaches ONLY how to pass the bar there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
13. I'm having trouble getting past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:09 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. And the reality is, her bifurcated question quesiton is answered in the constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:29 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. she writes question twice because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #19 |
31. Was Lee L. Mercer an instructor at her online law school? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demwing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
14. 4th page, lines 16 -19, assumes the Hawaii BC is not official. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:12 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milk (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
16. "WHAT IF POLITICAL MAJORITY CHOOSES SLAVERY?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dccrossman (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
18. Top paragraph of (page 9 of 35 at the top) is worth following the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:41 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. hee hee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:41 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Hello! "... if California sunshine is ever allowed to shine on this evidence..."?! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 11:01 AM Response to Reply #25 |
35. LOL!!!! I think the CA sunshine is shining on Orly's crazy. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:19 PM Response to Reply #18 |
48. I swear she had to have paid someone to take it for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwassa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
20. "her quest for truth, justice, and the American Way" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:39 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. But we all know that Obama is the son of Jor-el |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
52. OMG! It WAS Superman! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
26. "Fundamentally it all comes down to a single bifurcated question question." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
36. LOL! I have to admit I was only able to read to page 10 of 35... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 11:14 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. I think Judge David O. Carter is the most patient jurist on the bench |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
37. Perhaps she should sue Dick Cheney for a preposterous “cop out” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 11:15 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. She fails to mention the constitutional requirements for objection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #39 |
55. Oh--please don't ruin the latest birther meme--the Freepers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #37 |
53. You hit upon a new birther meme--Cheney fucked the Electoral Count to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Donofrio is even more batshit insane that Taitz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucy Goosey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
43. Dear California Bar, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damonm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
44. Naming MICHELLE OBAMA as a co-defendant?!?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
45. This filing is even funnier than Mayo v. Satan and his Staff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #45 |
68. OMG, I'd forgotten about that one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:35 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Ms. Connie Lingus? I recognized that one by the cite, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 09:40 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Ha! Everybody knows that case, I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insanity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
49. I couldn't read it all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Retrograde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. I skimmed, but got bogged on when I got to Justice Taney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
50. ok, this is what finally really got me peeing my pants... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrogL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
51. Can I have whatever she's on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
60. Just when I start to think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. The stupid, it burns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 05:55 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Oh. Tell me more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 06:31 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. HE most definitely is nuttier than a Taitz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 07:40 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-23-09 12:22 AM Response to Reply #63 |
75. What in the name of fuck? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catshrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
65. Is a decision due tomorrow? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 07:56 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. The hearing on this case is October 5. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catshrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:20 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
69. I wish she would stop literally making a federal case out of this. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bodhi BloodWave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
70. is it just me, or did she actually miswrite Rhodes on the very last page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Bacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-22-09 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
74. Did this ass ever hear of SPELL CHECK? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC