Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which President was most pro-common people, and which was most anti-common people?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 10:03 PM
Original message
Which President was most pro-common people, and which was most anti-common people?
I would definitely have to take Franklin D. Roosevelt as the President that was most for the common American citizen. FDR had the concept of a Second Bill of Rights that would eliminate monopolies, grant legal rights to healthcare, a job with a living wage, and so forth and so on. His efforts at pushing Social Security through Congress created an important social safety net that is so accepted today that even the most brainwashed corporate shills take for granted. The Federal tax code was in order under FDR's administration. Labor unions successfully organized under the Roosevelt administration, and worker rights were expanded with the National Labor Relations Act. He worked tirelessly to end the Great Depression.

On the other hand, Ronald Reagan is without a doubt (in addition to being the worst President in history) the most anti-common citizen, most pro-wealthy President in the history of the United States. He supported the broken concept of supply-side economics, an economic theory so flawed that even Dubya's father criticized and derisively referred to it as "Voodoo Economics." Taxes for the rich were slashed while the tax burden remained largely the same on the common American taxpayer. Reagan was vehemently anti-union, and if he could have outlawed unions, he would have done it in a heartbeat. He was no friend of Social Security either, as it was under his watch to start taxing Social Security benefits upon which many retired poor and middle-class Americans depend on. The great dichotomy of the rich getting obscenely richer while most people struggle to make ends meet started under Reagan. And his failed, broken supply-side nonsense, also championed by Bush II, is largely the reason why our economy is currently in the greatest dive that it has been in since the Great Depression.

Who would you pick for the most pro-common citizen President, and the one most opposed to the common American?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. in my lifetime, I think Clinton was most pro-common
reagan was most anti-common - he appealed to a great many people (fucking idiots) but his greatest concern was rich folk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Had he lived, been nominated in Chicago, and defeated Nixon, Robert Kennedy
would have been the president I'd consider most in tune with the common man or woman.

His brother John was no slouch at it.

As for the least attuned, possibly Poppy Bush, or going back a bit, James Buchanan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'd say pro - Jimmy Carter/anti - Dick Nixon
Based on their histories to date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I really wonder today...
What party Nixon would of registered under if he was alive today. He was an odd character full of racism and hatred. But...ya know, on the political spectrum he just might come up to a left of some of the so called "Blue Dogs"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yeah, I take that back about Nixon
For someone who created the EPA, affirmative action, NOAA, went to China, presided over Roe v. Wade, abolished conscription....

Yeah, he wasn't so terrible after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bill Clinton was most pro-common,
Bush was most anti-common. i would have almost tied him with Regan, but I think Regan was already out of it and his people set his policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gwereeya Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Okay.....
...I was gonna say that about Reagan, but I didn't want to get banned for being mean or anything. But I see you have a 1000+ posts under your belt, so:

Reagan was too out of it to be considered. In my lifetime, Carter was the best and Dick Cheney the worst. (What??? You think Dubya was the real President?????)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Actually I meant Bush
the elder. Yeah big dick had his hand so far up georges ,ass what people thought was his tongue was really cheneys thumb. Welcome to DU.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. FDR was the most 'pro-common people.'
Ronald Reagan, despite his being proclaimed a god by many fools in our country, was the most "anti-common people" President of all time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thats probably a good summary
Unfortunately, I lack knowledge on some of the more obscure presidents. But, FDR also had circumstances that allowed him to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. The best for wage slaves FDR
The worst for wage slaves reagan- trickle down and clinton- welfare reform, nafta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crosseyed Jesus Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-28-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Commander & Chimp...............
Bu$h*t surly took the moniker of anti-common away from, the Prince for the Rich, son of a bitch, Ronald Reagan.
I would like to say that Clinton was pro-common, but I know better then that. I would have to give it to Jimmy Carter. I am comfortable with that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gwereeya Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. As stated above and echoed by me.....
...Reagan was too out-of-it to really be considered one way or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. Andrew Jackson was probably the most pro-common people
One of the Presidents from the latter half of the 1800's when the robber barons held sway and political corruption was rampant might be a good candidate for the most anti-common people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delete_bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Andrew Jackson was in office
from 1829-1837.
He supported slavery and Indian removal. The Trail of Tears, that sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. Pro, FDR, anti, Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. I have a perception that FDR and LBJ were both pro-common.
Bush 2 gets my vote for anti-common....I do not know a great deal about any president between the first several and before FDR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC