Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shouldn't the DFL have the state convention in March instead of June,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:18 PM
Original message
Shouldn't the DFL have the state convention in March instead of June,
...so we can unite around a US Senate candidate sooner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unless we start electing the state convention delegates at the caucuses
there just isn't time to do that. And, electing state delegates at the caucus would just add to the confusion as we would wind up with subcaucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why not a schedule of....
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 03:54 PM by Eric J in MN
Feb 5 - first caucuses
late Feb - precinct caucuses
late March - statewide caucus

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How easy a tight schedule is to work with can depend on how many volunteers you have to help pull
it all together.

Two years ago my SD had two weeks between the caucuses and the SD convention. Some of the convention details were done in well advance, but other things like credentials and resolutions, the things that can't be done until after the caucus were all done in a rush. We have 5 weeks between the two this year and it's a much easier pace. If there'd just been two weeks this year I don't know how everything would have gotton done. And, while we have a lot of new people who signed up as delegates to the convention, I'm mainly seeing the same old faces doing the work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Maybe we need a new process, in which people vote...
...for both the presidential candidate and the US Senate candidate on February 5, and that determines both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not a February Primary
September is too late and opens the process up to recount issues but February is way to early to have the candidate set in stone for 9 months
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Norm Coleman was set in stone as the Republican nominee for six years.
I'd like for us to know the DFL nominee for US Senate from Feb 5 through early November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The campaigns are already too long
and someone who looks good in February may look like a big mistake by June.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Exactly right
It's not a bad thing to have time to reflect on the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Al Franken will have run for two years by November.
It takes two years to select a US Senator. But Democrats have uncertainty for most of the way to November, and the Republicans don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Because the Republicans have the incumbant
And, an earlier endorsement would favor the candidate with the most money - and the candidate with the most money is not necessarily the best choice. I agree that a September primary is too late, June would make much more sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC