Mercury is dangerous to the human brain, especially for fetuses, babies, and children.
The EPA of the Bush Administration
will allow coal-burning power plants to use...
...a "cap-and-trade" program in which they...choose between reducing (mercury) emissions or paying to pollute, whichever (is) cheaper. Overall emissions would be reduced over time, but at a much more leisurely pace.
..."Hot spots" of heavy local deposition would continue.
The above is from a Minneapolis Star Tribune editorial of March 24, "
Mercury pollution: EPA suppresses dissenting study."
A
letter in today's Minneapolis Star Tribune specifically discusses the mercury pollution from coal-burning power plants in Minnesota.
Getting rid of mercury
Three cheers to the Star Tribune for a great editorial on mercury pollution (March 24). This is an issue we need to take seriously in Minnesota -- 100 percent of our lakes are under a fish consumption advisory because of mercury contamination.
Rep. Ray Cox, R-Northfield, and Sen. Scott Dibble, DFL-Minneapolis, are introducing legislation that would require coal-burning power plants to cut mercury emissions by 90 percent. This is a big step toward getting rid of mercury in Minnesota. Other legislators need to jump on the mercury-free bandwagon, and fast. We obviously can't rely on the Environmental Protection Agency to fix the mercury problem for us.
Aaron Leonard, Minneapolis.
More at:
http://www.moveleft.com/moveleft_essay_2005_03_28_mercury_pollution_in_minnesota_and_the_rest_of_the_country.asp