Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Got any messages for NH Democrats??? Speak up now!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » New Hampshire Donate to DU
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 06:37 AM
Original message
Got any messages for NH Democrats??? Speak up now!
This weekend is the annual convention of the New Hampshire
Democratic Party and Mr. Tesha and I will be there with
bells on.

Do any of you have any issues that you'd especially like
to see raised/pressed/reported on?

Remember, here's the current state of the state:

o Governor: John Lynch, a wimpy Democrat in his
second two-year term, not a big fan of brave
stands or clear policy unless pushed very hard.

o Executive Council (~five lieutenant governors):
Newly majority Democrat after ages of Republican
unanimity.

o State House: Newly majority Democrat for the first
time in ages and ages.

o State Senate: Newly majority Democrat for the first
time in even longer ages and ages.

o Congresscritters: 1st CD: Carol Shea Porter, a pretty
liberal, anti-war Democrat who replaced an entrenched
series of Republicans. 2nd CD: Paul Hodes, a pretty
liberal, anti-war Democrat who replaced Charlie Bass,
an entrenched Bushie in an entrenched Republican seat
(almost a century-long run save 2 years of Dick Swett,
a sort-of Democrat).

o Senators: Judd Gregg, arch Republicon, save for four
more years. John Sununu Jr., son of George the First's
chief of Staff John Sununu, up for election and rapidly
shifting leftwards in an attempt to con the rubes into
re-electing him. Katarina Swett, wife of Dick Swett, is
running for the Democratic nomination.

o In the news: We just passed into law gay civil unions,
an idea that was completely unthinkable 12 months ago
when Republicans held a lock on NH politics.


So, what's hot on your mind???

Tesha
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,
The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War,The War, The War, The War, The War, The War, The War. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. If I understood you correctly...
If I understood you correctly, you want us to make sure
the party is clear on "the war"? ;)

Trust us, we're *ON* this one!

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Look,don't beat around the bush...just say what's on your mind.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Some people are just too soto voce, y'know? (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Worry not -- *EVERYONE* wants the war ended.
I think it's safe to say that there wasn't *ANYBODY*
there who was in favor of the war, and every time
anybody mentioned ending the war, all 519 delegates
jumped to their feet. The faster the pull-out proposed,
the stronger the response.

And, of course, the candidates are all in favor of
ending the war, even those who started the war.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NHTimberwolf1965 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. The War
God Bless every military person who is serving in Iraq/Afghanistan right now. I strongly regret that I am a disabled veteran and I cannot serve any longer. I pray and hope everyone serving from New Hampshire and beyond comes home safe and sound just as quick as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
usrbs Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Pass a resolution to impeach Bush-Cheney
Our convention here in Massachusetts did so a few weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Kucinich got a standing ovation for calling for Cheney's impeachment.
> Pass a resolution to impeach Bush-Cheney

There was no opportunity to introduce legislation
from the floor, but Dennis Kucinich got a standing
ovation for calling for Cheney's impeachment.

Other than a few shout-outs from the floor, there
was *NO* other mention of impeachment.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Parental Notification
A dear friend in NH tells me that it's a hot issue there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good point, but last I knew, we were going to jettison the law.
Edited on Fri Jun-01-07 07:49 AM by Tesha
Good point, but last I knew, we were going to jettison
the troublesome law (although we should have jetissoned
Kelly Ayotte first -- *ALWAYS* get rid of Republican
"hold-overs"!).

But I'll be sure to ask what the current status is.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Ahh, there we are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'd like Voter Caging stopped. Habeas Corpus restored and NSA spying banned
And peace on earth and good will to all.

Can you get your state to take care of all this for me? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Habeus Corpus got mentioned and applauded many times. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. Tell them thank-you and well-done re: civil unions.
It's an important step toward true marriage fairness, and the good people of New Hampshire deserve a round of applause.

:applause:


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks; I'm sure it will come up! (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Civil unions got a steady stream of applause every time it was mentioned.
> Tell them thank-you and well-done re: civil unions.

Civil unions got a steady stream of applause every time
it was mentioned and it was mentioned often; the only
time it ever got soft-pedaled was by Lynch the Wuss
who mentioned he signed a bill that "guaranteed fairness
to all families" but *NEVER* mentioned it by name.

Kucinich got a roaring full-throated standing ovation
when he called for full federal marriage equality.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kicking it up for the evening crowd... (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. Jobs and healthcare and the war and if any
DLCers rear their ugly heads, mow them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well, Democrats had a great day here in the Granite State
Well, Democrats had a great day here in the Granite State.

With 519 delegates and over 300 guests, we had the best-
attended convention in (I think) 24 years.

Biden, Kucinich, Dodd, Gravel, and Richardson addressed
us. Michelle Obama spoke for Barack, David Bonior spoke
for John Edwards, and some governor spoke for Clinton.

We also heard from our three candidates for US Senate
to replace John Sununu, Jr.

With regard to the Presidential race (and putting aside
my wish that Al Gore would step in), my top five choices
would be:

1. Dennis Kucinich
2. Dennis Kucinich
3. Dennis Kucinich
4. Bill Richardson
5. A tie between Chris Dodd and Mike Gravel

Holy cow was Kucinich on fire! he had the crowd roaring for
nearly his entire speech! If it were not for the media and
their "positioning of Dennis as unelectable, he'd be
president already! *EVERYTHING* he said, I agreed with!

Richardson was on target too, and an excellent speaker,
mixing up the motivational stuff with humor. I still need
to be better informed on his DLC ties, but I saw/heard
nothing to oppose him for today. I ended up having lunch
at the Richardson table and chatting with him for a few
minutes.

Dodd says the right things, but at least today, lacked
passion.

Gravel is worth hearing. They gave him the lousiest speaking
slot of the day (speaking while lunch was still wrapping up),
but, *DAMN!*, can he call it straight or what? He called for
laws to be passed that would criminalize conduct that furthered
the Iraqi war.

We got one "God Bless America!" -- it came from the Clinton
shill.

Michelle Obama called on us to pray for her husband's
candidacy.

Biden, well, maybe he can get some corporations to vote
for him 'cause the Tesha family won't be doing it.

Interesting sidelight: The "Draft Gore" folks asked to
speak but were told "no".

All in all, it was a great day to be a Democrat in NH!

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Brock of media matters said that reporters told him
that of course they don't cover Kucinich. They say that if they did then Kucinich would be elected president. Reporters he talked to are strongly against that idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
taylor egv420106 Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Let me guess
But he can't name ANY of the reporters, where he talked to them, when he talked to them or actually provide ANYTHING that supports that claim yet DK supporters will lap it up like a kitten takes to milk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thank them for me
They became the fourth state to legalize civil unions for gays and the FIRST to do it on their own, with no lawsuit pending.
Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Saw a great article on the convention
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) - Iraq was the top subject for presidential hopefuls addressing delegates at the state Democratic Party convention in New Hampshire today.

In a warm-up to tomorrow's nationally televised New Hampshire debate, Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, Dennis Kucinich and Bill Richardson promoted themselves as the ones with the vision and answers for solving Iraq through diplomacy.

For instance, Dodd called for a surge in diplomacy instead of a surge in military power. Richardson said if elected, he would announce on his first day in office that America is going to get out of Iraq, with diplomacy.

Kucinich won the loudest applause when he said it is time to impeach Vice President Dick Cheney, considered by many to be the architect of the war. He chided reporters, saying he gets the same rousing response around the country, and is just waiting to be discovered by the media.

This afternoon, former Alaska Senator Mike Gravel spoke of punishment, not diplomacy, saying the quickest way to end the war is to make it illegal. He also said fellow Democrats who voted to authorize the war aren't qualified to lead the country, even if they now regret the vote.

http://www.wcax.com/Global/story.asp?S=6602265&nav=4QcS
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. What's going on with that tax evasion couple whose house the
SWAT team surrounded on June 7?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Nothing much, AFAIK.
The Feds seized her dental practice in Lebanon, but other
than that, nothing much.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NHTimberwolf1965 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. Jean Shaheen
Jean Shaheen is running for the U.S. Senate. It is time to replace John Sununu (thank God). Everyone get out and vote for Jean wherever you are and send Jean to Washington so she can do the work for us New Hampshirites and the country. Whereas John Sununu has been right up the President's deriear for the past x number of years on every issue from the Iraq War to the FISA Laws to the SCHIP funding, it is time to send Jean to Washington to get our civil liberties back, bring our troops home, stop the warrantless wiretaps and the phone companies turning over our phoine records to the government, and fund the SCHIP to cover the children in this state whho have no health insurance whatsoever. I have no children, but if I did, and I couldn't afford the insurance, which I already know I can't, I would be applying for SCHIP myself. It is time to send someone to Washington who is going to do the job and stand up for the working class people of the Granite State and Jean Shaheen is the person to do the job. Vote for Jean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cbmanchester Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. Get Some Guts and Impeach these Crooks
On the most petty level, we should get some payback for the Lewinsky affair. On a more prescient level, this administration has whittled away our civil liberties and simultaneously made us less safe (ask New Orleans how safe Homeland Security made them). Out sourcing a war to a closed bid for Halliburton, and now millions of dollars are missing, Iraq is not rebuilt, security firms are summarily killing civilians, and OH! the torture. Are we planning on being the opposition party any time soon, or is it more politically correct to be accomplices by doing nothing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. GREAT THREAD

It's good to see NEW HAMPSHIRE voters alive and well,keep kicking those repukes butts.
and vote for change!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. How do they think the North American Union will affect the U.S.?
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 07:03 PM by lisainmilo
I would like to know how the feel about the corporations and governments of the United States, Canada, and Mexico creating a North American Union. I want to know how this will affect the United States Markets, Industrialization, Health Care and how we will stand in the world as this issue continues to be pressed. Many Canadians are protesting this, in fact they wear the red/white ribbon, much like we wear the pink ribbon for the fight against cancer. Since most of our industry,textile,manufacturing jobs are going across the borders and overseas, just exactly how do they think this will affect us?

Canadian, U.S., and Mexican elites, including CEOS and politicians, have a plan to create common North American policies and further integrate our economies. This plan goes by various names and euphemisms, such as "deep integration", "NAFTA-plus", "harmonization", the "Big Idea", the "Grand Bargain", and the "North American Security and Prosperity Initiative". Regardless of which name your prefer, the end goal of all of these plans is to create a new political and economic entity that would supercede the existing countries. Advocates refer to it as a "North American Community", but it is also known as the North American Union (NAU). Theoretically, it would be similar to and competetive with the European Union (EU). The individual currencies of each country would be replaced by a common currency called the "Amero" and everything from environmental regulations to security would be brought in line with a common standard.


Vive le Canada.ca offers the following timeline as a resource to educate the general public about the progress of the three countries toward a new North American Union (NAU).


Vive le Canada.ca opposes the creation of the North American Union (NAU) because we believe it will mean the loss of Canadian sovereignty and democracy and hand over more power to giant, unelected corporations. We also believe that unlike the EU, the countries joining the NAU are not roughly equal in size and power and that this means the U.S. will most certainly be setting policy for all three countries. Considering the unpopularity of the Bush administration and its policies in the U.S., Canada, and around the world we believe that erasing the borders between our countries and adopting U.S. policies at this time is a bad idea and will create economic, political and military insecurity in this country. We hope that raising awareness about the plan to create a North American Union (NAU) will create opposition and encourage debate in all three countries, but especially in Canada.


Note: This timeline is a work in progress and will be updated as events progress. If you notice a correction that needs to be made or an event that should be included, please email susan.thompson@vivelecanada.ca. Please allow time for updates to be made as they will be made less frequently than updates to the main page of the site.


Time line and More from Vive le Canada: http://www.vivelecanada.ca/staticpages/index.php/20060830133702539


In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized
.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.


More from Humanevents: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965




Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » New Hampshire Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC