Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Crispin Miller connects the dots on election problems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 08:54 PM
Original message
Mark Crispin Miller connects the dots on election problems


BuzzFlash Interviews
BuzzFlash.com
02.13.06

Mark Crispin Miller, professor of culture and communication at New York University, is an expert in propaganda and mass persuasion. Having scrutinized the election of 2004, he concludes that team Bush wants to permanently disenfranchise the majority. In his "J'accuse" book on the 2004 election, Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Election - Why They'll Steal the Next One Too (Unless We Stop Them), Miller documents how the Republicans likely stole a second presidential election, just in a more complicated way than they did in 2000.

To those who dismiss such claims as "over the top," BuzzFlash responds, if the Republicans stole the presidency in 2000 by hot-wiring the Supreme Court of the United States, why wouldn't they do it again? They would -- and they probably did. If we could transplant Mark Crispin Miller's passion and stamina into the backbones of the Democrats in the U.S. Senate, we wouldn't have a silent coup taking place now in the United States. In this, part two of a two-part interview, Miller looks at the voting machines, and at our collective refusal to see and acknowledge what has happened to our democracy. (Part one is here.)

* * *

BuzzFlash: Let's talk about a major problem that the press refuses to discuss: the privatization of the voting process. That's really what the spread of computerized voting machines is all about. Diebold, ES'S and Sequoia - the three largest manufacturers of such machines - are private vendors. They keep their programming codes secret as “proprietary information,” and worse, all three are extremely close to the Republican party. There is no way to determine whether these machines are accurate. Using them is tantamount to having secret vote counts.

Diebold in particular has been in the news. Some months before election day, 2004, Wally O'Dell, Diebold's CEO, sent a Bush/Cheney fundraising letter out to other rich Ohio Republicans, promising to do everything he could to “deliver Ohio's electoral vote to the president.” In December, he suddenly resigned. What's going on?



http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemID=20351
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. kicked and rec'd!! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. All we can do is keep this issue alive and KICKING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. The two Buzzflash interviews are *excellent* -
Each time I think that I have read everything Mark Crispin Miller has written on this topic I find something new - really new from him - he doesn't just recycle the same old, he keeps adding new information.

Highly recommended:

Part 1: Mark Crispin Miller Connects the Dots - Buzzflash Interview

Part 2: Mark Crispin Miller Connects the Dots - Buzzflash Interview

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. if you were a candidate, what would you say about this?
me, i would harp on this. but then i guess harry reid would be calling up my donors and telling them to dry up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Boy does this some it all up:
"We can catalogue the double standards till the cows come home, but it won't make any difference whatsoever. Because such rational argument is only that - and the movement we're fighting isn't rational. This is something that a lot of savvy people can't or won't perceive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC