Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Future of Elections – Accurate & Fair – Election Reform News 26 Feb 2007

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:40 AM
Original message
The Future of Elections – Accurate & Fair – Election Reform News 26 Feb 2007
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 06:45 AM by autorank

Election Fraud, Research & Discussion NewsNovember 26, 2006

1) Weekly Comment (also http://tinyurl.com/369pn6">Here)
2) Weekly Links Here

Featuring DU Poster rumple’s analysis of Diebold and LA County
"Diebolding" Our Elections


This strategy prevents voting-machine errors from affecting the election results.







1. Bar codes can be used on the paper receipts to make recounts faster and more reliable.

Response: Bar codes are impossible for the voter to verify, and can deviate from the human-readable data. This undermines their trustworthiness for elections..

2. Paper receipts are an effective antidote to ballot tampering.

Response: If a receipt gets "misprinted," some voters will overlook the error, others will blame themselves. Even if a machine becomes suspect, its earlier errors can't be culled.

Errors such as these can be designed to appear accidental and to leave no evidence to the contrary. Professional hackers don't leave digital "fingerprints."


3. Touch-screen systems can produce paper receipts, but cannot produce paper ballots.

Response: Touch-screen systems can be designed to produce true paper ballots.
• The touch-screen module would help the voter prepare a ballot image that is free of overvotes, undervotes, ambiguous markings, and illegible write-ins.
• When satisfied with the ballot image, the voter would instruct the machine to print a true paper ballot, which the voter then verifies and deposits in the ballot box.
• The official vote count is tallied from the paper ballots. (Tallies from the touch-screen modules are unofficial, and serve as a check on the official tallies.)


This strategy prevents voting-machine errors from affecting the election results.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R Hand Counted Paper Ballots! Nothing More Nothing Less! Thanks Autorank! Great Post. I hope peopl
e take time to read it and understand it. It is imperative that we accept nothing more and nothing less than hcpb's. NO source code anywhere. NO "receipts". No "trail".

The most secure transparent ballot that also happens to be the simplest and cheapest method is hand counted paper ballots.

We need a constitutional amendment requiring hcpb's.

Thank you Michael for your good works and for your diligence. It is very much so appreciated.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Honored to give the 5th rec
'cause it's totally spankable. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. With AG Looking Over Me
I'm giving this a K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Troubled, Twisted, Sometimes Invisible Paper Trail
Below are the trouble reports from a touchscreen/paper trail county in
North Carolina.


The reports are for Mecklenburg County in the May primary and November General Election.

The report lists the many different problems with the touch-screens and their tempermental thermal printers, printers that often jammed or failed.

The NC Coalition for Verified Voting predicted these problems in advance and had urged all NC counties to purchase the tried and true optical scan systems and not the touch-screen machines. (See www.ncvoter.net )

Here are the details


Mecklenburg trouble report, types of problems, by category, see the link for more detail

-Paper jams, screen freezes, programming errors etc listed.
-Panel would not charge.
-Screen freeze.
-Out of calibration.
-Printer folding edge of paper.
-Flash error/CRC error
-Power shut down.
-Printer frozen/power issue
-Half of screen missing.
-"Locked up".
-CJ could not open panel
-Battery low.
-Printer door won't lock.
-Corrupted flashcard - message.
-Pct wkrs could not change paper roll.
-RTAL not found - message
-Panel beeping, screen frozen.
-Chirping, but dead.
-4 panels had printers not working
-No response on 3 machines
-Broken leg.
-Panel fell/release latch won't work.
-Panel would not accept Master PEB.
-Ballot will not display.
-Goes directly to Party Select when Master -
-ADA programmed wrong.
-Paper roll on backwards
-Can't make selections when press screen.
-ADA problem, audio tried - blank screen.
-Time setting is off by 1 hour


They had deployed slightly over a thousand touch-screen machines to the polling places.

http://www.ncvoter.net/downloads/Mecklenburg_2006_Trouble_Report.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. OPINION: Making sure votes count
Article published Thursday, February 22, 2007
Making sure votes count - http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070222/OPINION02/702220316

FOR a while on election night in 2004, it seemed as though the presidential winner might be determined by Ohio's "provisional ballots."

.....

Most people who cast them don't know this, even though they have a right to find out whether or not their ballot was counted. Yet as it now stands, people will never know unless they contact their county election board and ask.

This needs fixing, and the state legislature should step in and require election boards to contact those whose votes were not counted and tell them why.

.....

Cuyahoga and Franklin County, which includes the state capital, cast the most provisional ballots last fall, and Cuyahoga had one of the biggest rejection rates. The Secretary of State's Web site states that 17,656 provisional ballots were cast in Cuyahoga County, but that more than one in every three of these votes were thrown out.

That is in dramatic contrast to Franklin County, where nearly 87 percent of the provisional ballots were ruled legitimate.

.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. OHIO to establish uniform standards for poll worker training
Study: Poll workers, not machines, build voter confidence
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Karen Farkas
Plain Dealer Reporter
http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/summit/117205050744360.xml&coll=2

Akron - It's the people who work at the polls on Election Day, not the machines recording the votes, who give a voter confidence that the process will be fair, a researcher says.

"There is a consistent relationship in the rating of job performance and the confidence a vote will be counted accurately," Quin Monson, an assistant professor at Brigham Young University, told the Summit County Board of Elections on Tuesday. He headed a study that surveyed voters and poll workers in Summit and Franklin counties during and after the November 2006 election.

The state plans to establish uniform standards for poll worker training, said Patrick Gallaway, director of communications for Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner. .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC