Election Fraud, Research & Discussion NewsNovember 26, 2006
1) Weekly Comment (also http://tinyurl.com/369pn6">Here)
2) Weekly Links Here
Featuring DU Poster rumples analysis of Diebold and LA County
"Diebolding" Our Elections
This strategy prevents voting-machine errors from affecting the election results.
1. Bar codes can be used on the paper receipts to make recounts faster and more reliable.Response: Bar codes are impossible for the voter to verify, and can deviate from the human-readable data. This undermines their trustworthiness for elections..
2. Paper receipts are an effective antidote to ballot tampering.Response: If a receipt gets "misprinted," some voters will overlook the error, others will blame themselves. Even if a machine becomes suspect, its earlier errors can't be culled.
Errors such as these can be designed to appear accidental and to leave no evidence to the contrary. Professional hackers don't leave digital "fingerprints."
3. Touch-screen systems can produce paper receipts, but cannot produce paper ballots.Response: Touch-screen systems can be designed to produce true paper ballots.
The touch-screen module would help the voter prepare a ballot image that is free of overvotes, undervotes, ambiguous markings, and illegible write-ins.
When satisfied with the ballot image, the voter would instruct the machine to print a true paper ballot, which the voter then verifies and deposits in the ballot box.
The official vote count is tallied from the paper ballots. (Tallies from the touch-screen modules are unofficial, and serve as a check on the official tallies.)
This strategy prevents voting-machine errors from affecting the election results.