Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"I assure you that applying for a photo ID is as easy or easier than getting on welfare..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:03 PM
Original message
"I assure you that applying for a photo ID is as easy or easier than getting on welfare..."
Former Minnesota Secretary of State Mary Kiffmeyer (R) displaying her true colors.

http://www.startribune.com/politics/state/13489471.html

One citizen, one vote, one form of ID?

<snip>

Minnesotans are deeply involved in a partisan fight, headed to the Supreme Court, over requiring photo IDs to vote. Democrats say such laws keep minorities from voting.
By KEVIN DIAZ, Star Tribune
Last update: January 7, 2008 - 6:48 AM

<snip>

This week, as the presidential campaign picks up momentum, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear an Indiana voter ID case that divides opinion largely along partisan lines -- and puts a pair of Minnesotans in the national spotlight.

One is Rep. Keith Ellison, a Democrat who has helped challenge Indiana's new photo ID requirements as an "unconstitutional poll tax" that discriminates against minorities.

The other is former Minnesota Secretary of State Mary Kiffmeyer, a Republican who has testified in Congress in favor of photo ID requirements, which she says are essential to the integrity of the democratic process.

<snip>

Ellison, who filed a "friend of the court" brief in the case last month, argues that Indiana's law is unconstitutional because it effectively imposes a financial obligation to vote. A regular Indiana driver's license costs $21. Although free photo ID cards are available to the indigent, Ellison says they still must incur costs to acquire the documentation needed to get the ID.

To Ellison, who has authored legislation preventing states from requiring photo ID to vote, any costs associated with voting eligibility are tantamount to the Jim Crow-era poll taxes that were banished by the 24th Amendment in 1964.

"It's unquestionable that this scheme creates a real obstacle to voting in federal elections," Ellison argues in his brief, which he submitted along with all 42 other members of the Congressional Black Caucus.

Kiffmeyer, who testified in Congress in November against Ellison's bill, argues that photo ID is about public confidence in the polling system.

As for the presumed burden on the poor and elderly, she said, "I assure you that applying for a photo ID is as easy or easier than getting on welfare or other social services."

Kiffmeyer, as secretary of state, fought a losing legal battle to prevent American Indian tribal IDs from being used for registration in off-reservation elections in Minnesota. The case created a rift not only with Democrats, but with former Minnesota U.S. Attorney Tom Heffelfinger, a Republican appointee who was later targeted for dismissal under President Bush's Justice Department, which supports photo ID laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. That statement will only work on someone who has never had to endure
applying for welfare. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. easy yes, just not in my lifetime and I'm a child of the early '50's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC