|
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 10:56 AM by tom_paine
This morning on DU that battle lines are being drawn in the usual ways. Coincidence Theorists vs Conspiracy Theorists.
Well, let's cut through the sneering and the flames and have a look at the Big Picture, shall we?
During the 90s, while most of us "slept" blissfully unaware, our voting system was taken away from us. It "went dark" to us as it was privatized and Bushie Judges made a rapid series of non-reported judicial decisions that completely insulated voting machine manufacturers from any kind of scrutiny or inspection by the public or our representatives.
Coincidentally, legions of video poker and electronic slot machines in Vegas and elsewhere, are somehow by this same logic NOT proprietary, and the various gaming agencies feel perfectly comfortable in inspecting them twice a year for glitches and rigging. Ultimately, the stakes played for in Vegas and AC pale before the stakes of "the game" determined by these uninspectable, non-transparent "voting" machines...control of trillions of dollars of public monies and rule of a huge and resource-filled nation.
That's the bottom line. The larger pattern of the "coincidence" that suddenly, at the exact same time our voting system "went dark", NOW we get "Dewey vs. Truman" upsets every election?
Can the Coincidence Theorists admit this is a deeply disturbing pattern, particularly given the timing?
I am a scientist, and I understand that correlation does not necessarily mean causation.
Can the Conspiracy Theorists admit that not every anomaly automatically means vote-rigging? Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, as it were.
Let's remember who the real enemy is: the people who foisted this Third-World non-transparent, uninspectable voting system on we who are are supposed to be "the free-est people in the world".
There is absolutely no way to determine if last night's "surprise upset" was real or not. Skinner's post on the Exit Polling is very interesting, but we saw in 2004 how the networks retroactively went back and redid their exit polls to match the results.
In 2002, there were no exit polls at all, and in that non-transparent darkness, we saw a number of "surprise upsets", like GA and MN. In 2006, there were numerous glaring discrepancies especially in Florida, all swept under the rug into what is now the customary darkness of legitimate requests for investigations refused, often by our own Democrats. And of course in 2000, the first year of extensive non-transparent privatized "voting", was the first of this apparently endless series of "surprise upsets", down in Florida.
|