Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Times OpEd on Rush Holt's Emergency Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:58 AM
Original message
New York Times OpEd on Rush Holt's Emergency Bill
Anyone know who wrote this OpEd? Web page doesn't indicate. It's not bad.. better than their feature article last weeke beause it clearly states there needs to be audits on all elections.



http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/opinion/16wed1.html

January 16, 2008
Editorial

A Quick Fix for Electronic Voting

When Americans go to the polls in November, many will likely have to cast their ballots on unreliable paperless electronic voting machines. If the election is close, the country could end up with a rerun of 2000’s bitterly contentious and mistrusted count. In an effort to avoid another such disaster, Representative Rush Holt, Democrat of New Jersey, plans to introduce a bill this week that would help address the weaknesses in electronic voting. Congress should pass it without delay.

The flaws of electronic voting machines have been thoroughly documented by academic studies and by voters’ experiences. The machines are far too vulnerable to hacking that could change the outcomes of elections. They are also so prone to mechanical error and breakdown that there is no way to be sure that the totals they report are correct. In some cases, these machines have been known to “flip” votes — award votes cast for one candidate to an opponent.

The solution is for all votes to be recorded on paper records. Voters can then verify that their choice has been accurately reflected — and the paper record can be used as a backup for the electronic machines. Whenever votes are tallied on electronic machines, there should be an audit of paper records as a check on the electronic results. If the paper totals do not match the electronic tallies, something has clearly gone wrong — and the tally of the paper ballots can be treated as the official one.

more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/opinion/16wed1.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. This has to be passed at the state level too
If states choose to do this, they can get reimbursed, but there has to be an effort to get it done at the state level. We really should stop everything else and get this done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, this bill seems to only provide funding for those states who choose
to conduct audits or print paper receipts.

so it's up to local activists to demand that their SoS take the money and do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's exactly right n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Written by the Editorial Board for the Times
They've been pretty up to date on this issue.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC